Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 753
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 minutes ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Cabrera finishing the spring on a low note. More hard contact issues. Even allowing a homer to Grichuk.

Yeah, he was either way out of the zone or throwing meatballs. Didn't have any command.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Cabrera finishing the spring on a low note. More hard contact issues. Even allowing a homer to Grichuk.

10 hard hits in 4 innings.  Way too many.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
18 minutes ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Kade Snell 113.5/371 on a triple 

Dude officially has my attention. Huge power.

Really strong contact and chase #s this spring too.  Exciting stuff.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
52 minutes ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Kade Snell 113.5/371 on a triple 

Dude officially has my attention. Huge power.

Loving the bounce back from Snell. He was terrible to end the year for a guy who should be a quick mover in the system. Will be watching him closely this season. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 hour ago, muntjack said:

Amaya is going to be a beast.

Yeah, I don't see the concern about who will platoon with Busch. You've got to find at bats for Amaya and Kelly. 

Community Moderator
Posted
11 hours ago, Bull said:

Yeah, I don't see the concern about who will platoon with Busch. You've got to find at bats for Amaya and Kelly. 

Mine wasn't concern. It was simply asking the question based on not watching spring training and on who made the opening day roster. I heard both catchers got some reps at 1b, but didn't hear how many or whether it was working out. 

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Bull said:

Yeah, I don't see the concern about who will platoon with Busch. You've got to find at bats for Amaya and Kelly. 

Every right handed in house platoon option at 1st base is a reverse split guy outside of Kelly. Has Kelly taken reps at 1st base? 

Edited by Geographyhater8888
Old-Timey Member
Posted

FWIW it currently looks like rain is supposed to hit in the early evening tomorrow.  So the game looks safe but things don't have to shift a ton for that to change.

North Side Contributor
Posted

I'll assume the Neely thing will end up like Arias and Canario as: interesting youths who were DFA'd and never reappear in a meaningful way, but it's a bit surprising after he looked better this spring. 

Maybe they can sneak him through, though. 

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

Every right handed in house platoon option at 1st base is a reverse split guy outside of Kelly. Has Kelly taken reps at 1st base? 

Yeah he played 1b the other day

Apparently before the Austin injury Counsell said Busch had earned the right to play without a platoon anyways.  Maybe Austin was going to get more time at DH vs LHP than anything.

Edited by Stratos
  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
47 minutes ago, mul21 said:

Which part?

Losing Neely seems silly with how much other fat is on the roster.  Like he's probably nothing but Trevor Megill was probably nothing and Jeremiah Estrada was probably nothing.  We can't just hoard every live arm on the ~10% chance they pop but why are we dumping a live arm before we dump Justin Dean or Ben Cowles.

Speaking of Ben Cowles, why isn't he just taking the Kingery spot?  I assume the point of Kingery is basically that Shaw will probably not play 9 innings in a lot of games early.  He will either get subbed out for offense (Conforto) or defense (Carlson) until he proves himself more.  So you need another infielder in case Shaw gets swapped out and then god forbid like Nico pulls a hammy later on.  But otherwise that guy is just gonna rot on the bench, so why can't it just be Cowles?  Or hell it's just a week call up Ramirez and be like "hey man you had a great offseason and a great spring training hang out in Chicago for a week and collect a big league paycheck"?

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
12 minutes ago, Bertz said:

Losing Neely seems silly with how much other fat is on the roster.  Like he's probably nothing but Trevor Megill was probably nothing and Jeremiah Estrada was probably nothing.  We can't just hoard every live arm on the ~10% chance they pop but why are we dumping a live arm before we dump Justin Dean or Ben Cowles.

Speaking of Ben Cowles, why isn't he just taking the Kingery spot?  I assume the point of Kingery is basically that Shaw will probably not play 9 innings in a lot of games early.  He will either get subbed out for offense (Conforto) or defense (Carlson) until he proves himself more.  So you need another infielder in case Shaw gets swapped out and then god forbid like Nico pulls a hammy later on.  But otherwise that guy is just gonna rot on the bench, so why can't it just be Cowles?  Or hell it's just a week call up Ramirez and be like "hey man you had a great offseason and a great spring training hang out in Chicago for a week and collect a big league paycheck"?

Luke Little and Riley Martin and Maples haven't thrown a strike in their lives and the Cubs keep guys like that on the 40 and dump guys like Estrada and Neely who lose their release point for 1 season.  I don't get it.  Highly doubtful Neely gets through waivers.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
28 minutes ago, Bertz said:

Losing Neely seems silly with how much other fat is on the roster.  Like he's probably nothing but Trevor Megill was probably nothing and Jeremiah Estrada was probably nothing.  We can't just hoard every live arm on the ~10% chance they pop but why are we dumping a live arm before we dump Justin Dean or Ben Cowles.

Speaking of Ben Cowles, why isn't he just taking the Kingery spot?  I assume the point of Kingery is basically that Shaw will probably not play 9 innings in a lot of games early.  He will either get subbed out for offense (Conforto) or defense (Carlson) until he proves himself more.  So you need another infielder in case Shaw gets swapped out and then god forbid like Nico pulls a hammy later on.  But otherwise that guy is just gonna rot on the bench, so why can't it just be Cowles?  Or hell it's just a week call up Ramirez and be like "hey man you had a great offseason and a great spring training hang out in Chicago for a week and collect a big league paycheck"?

I just looked up Neely's velo stats, he was throwing 93.6 this spring, was 94.4 last season and in 2024 threw 95.6 in AAA and 96.4 in 9 ip for the Cubs (possible adrenaline velo bump).  So trending down so they cut bait i guess.

Posted

That is surprising considering we could've cut other people. And I also don't understand why we're keeping Cowles but giving the bench spot to Kingery. Even if the plan is to just DFA the person after Seiya comes back, we've done it with Cowles multiple times. 

I get it, it's last minute, end of roster finagling but feels like we have no need for Justin Dean or Cowles or other relievers on the 40 man.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
10 minutes ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

Wait, is Carlson on the team?  Or is it Kingery instead?

Both made it.  image.thumb.jpeg.9bca46009b2f987bfa23e84f48aab0f7.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...