Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 618
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
7 hours ago, PeanutPunch33 said:

Couldn't an alternative explanation for this be that these are just crappy tiny fanbases relative to others?  Texas is a football state, and Arizona is not exactly a sports haven.  

This is one of the unspoken issues when parity comes up. If every team has the *same* chance of winning a WS in a given season, you're going to end up with WS matchups that are ostensibly bad for the sport because of fickle/apathetic fanbases.  Cripes, the Marlins have won more WS than most teams in MLB since 1997 and look where that got their attendance and media deals.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, PeanutPunch33 said:

If the definition of "good for the sport" is just the viewership ratings, then I can't disagree.  The Dodgers have a large enough fanbase that the "ratings" will always be great when they are good.

But if the league's goal is to grow the game outside of LA and NY then I just don't see it as a positive thing.  Fans in Cleveland, Detroit, Baltimore should feel like their team has a chance to win it all some day.  I would be stunned if a team like the Athletics win a championship in the next 50 years.  It shouldn't be like that.  

No, what's best for baseball is the most viewership during the World Series.  That means the most popular teams in the biggest markets, the Yankees and Dodgers, should be in the WS against each as much as possible and nobody else has much of a chance.  Fans in e.g Cleveland, Baltimore, Minnesota can abandon their teams and buy Yankees and Dodgers jerseys and join the bandwagon like everyone else.

The way to do this is getting rid of the luxury tax completely.  The Dodgers spent 170m in luxury tax penalties last year, so they could then use that money to buy even more great players like Soto, Cease etc and ensure total dominance.  Ram bigger sportsbooks into Yankee/Dodger Stadium and spraypaint Onlyfans ads across the OF grass so they can make even more money to spend.

A truly fantastic vision for the game.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Trading for Skubal shouldn’t be off the table no matter how costly. Happ and Suzuki might not be Cubs next season while Bregman and Swanson will also be a year older. The future is now and wasting this positional core on an incomplete and injured pitching staff seems like a wasted opportunity.

Edited by Geographyhater8888
Old-Timey Member
Posted

I wonder what it'd cost to nab both Soriano and Detmers?

Like it'd hurt, obviously, but you'd presumably have the rotation addressed for the next 2.5 years outside of Rea-type depth options.  If we're wanting to just cash in all our chips in the upper minors/MLB on one big move this feels like where I'd be willing to stretch to do something irresponsible?

Posted

You’d think they’d trade Hartshorn if that’s what it took if Tom gives Jed the green light to offer him a massive extension. With uncertainty over the new CBA you could entice him to stay.. maybe?

Posted (edited)

I want no part of this head case, but don't be surprised to see Jarren Duran get traded in the coming days.  They already have a crowded OF but with his antics, they might sell low on him just to get rid of him.  

 

Edited by PeanutPunch33
Old-Timey Member
Posted
11 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Per Sammon: Mets ask for Peralta is top-100 prospect and more. 

That feels like a lot given his FA status and recent performance, no?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Per Sammon: Mets ask for Peralta is top-100 prospect and more. 

I don't even want him as the primary SP acquisition 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Per Sammon: Mets ask for Peralta is top-100 prospect and more. 

I think they forgot a 0 lol

Posted
32 minutes ago, PeanutPunch33 said:

I want no part of this head case, but don't be surprised to see Jarren Duran get traded in the coming days.  They already have a crowded OF but with his antics, they might sell low on him just to get rid of him.  

 

I think Dansby has caught balls that further than that

Old-Timey Member
Posted
31 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Per Sammon: Mets ask for Peralta is top-100 prospect and more. 

This is where Trueblood's article makes sense. Jed's most likely not going to give up that much for Peralta alone, but throw Tong into the mix, and then it makes sense for us to make higher tier prospects available to the Mets. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
42 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Per Sammon: Mets ask for Peralta is top-100 prospect and more. 

shirley-laugh.gif

 

  • Haha 1
  • Love 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Also worth noting Sammon is a Mets writer who is transitioning to mode national stuff, so there's the same grain of salt as if you heard something suspiciously Cubs friendly from Jesse Rogers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...