Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

With whatever small areas we may disagree with each other on this, I think we ultimately agree that the Cubs need to probably push some chips in at some point between today and whenever the 2027 season kicks off. They have prospect capital to do it. And frankly, they have enough overlapping capital that I think it borders on prospect hugging at the organizational level not to. It'd be one thing if it were a load of pitching prospects when you consider pitching attrition, but with hitting prospects? Cash some in. 

I am in total agreement with this. Even if you look at the prospects we have. How different are they then last year. Cubs added a lot of higher end prospects by guys having good years. And a lot of overlap. Buy big now. There will be a new group of prospect again next year. 

  • Like 1
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
55 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

This is easy to say now because of how well Cease is doing and how poorly Bregman is doing. And you may have said it then, too. I am not saying you didn’t. So now you look like you were right. But I would bet in last few years people also wanted Corbin Burnes, Snell, Fried, Valdez, Rodon, etc… And I will also say during Cease contract years there will be a time we will be happy we didn’t have him. I was fine with Bregman before and still am. He just isn’t playing well. I am not a fan of giving a 30 year old pitcher with a lot of innings on his arm a 7 year deal. Right now, yes, looks like a good deal so people can sit back with “I told you so”. And DID TELL US. Let’s see how it all plays out. To me the mistake was not trading Shaw+ for a young pitcher. I think something like Bregman and Soriano(as an example) would be just about as good as Cease and Shaw. And it would come with less risk of injury to the high priced guy. 

When the offseason started I wanted Cease, Imai, and Cabrera. I had no interest in Bregman because of his age, declining bat speed and he was coming off an injury. I probably completely overreacted when they missed on Imai haha. I was hopeful and willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when they signed Bregman but oof, he’s who I was worried about. I don’t think he’s gonna be much better than what you see now. A good defender who hovers around a league average bat with no pop. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, ILMindState said:

When the offseason started I wanted Cease, Imai, and Cabrera. I had no interest in Bregman because of his age, declining bat speed and he was coming off an injury. I probably completely overreacted when they missed on Imai haha. I was hopeful and willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when they signed Bregman but oof, he’s who I was worried about. I don’t think he’s gonna be much better than what you see now. A good defender who hovers around a league average bat with no pop. 

Like I said, I don’t doubt you wanted Cease instead of Bregman. A lot of people did. And right now it is easy to say you were right. I just don’t like spending that kind of money and years on a 30 year old pitcher with a lot of innings under his belt let. Sure, looks like a great move now, but this is year 1 of 7. He will be well into his later 30’s by the time the contract is up. And more often than now spending on those arms doesn’t work well. As I said, to me if they signed Bregman, Shaw and/or Alcantara should have been traded for a young controlled solid arm. That is the bigger mistake to me. 

Posted

PCA over 6 fWAR. No one else has more than 5 offensively. Ohtani also shut down indefinitely from pitching, so if PCA keeps it up I’d expect him to lead all of baseball pretty soon. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
28 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Passan says Mason Miller is definitely available

I haven’t seen it, nor have I cared to look, but I had 2 buddies tell me today they read that SD insists on somebody eating the Bogaerts contract in any Mason Miller trade. Maybe that’s them just throwing it out there to see if anybody bites if true, but man if I’m SD, just give me the prospect haul. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JD94 said:

I haven’t seen it, nor have I cared to look, but I had 2 buddies tell me today they read that SD insists on somebody eating the Bogaerts contract in any Mason Miller trade. Maybe that’s them just throwing it out there to see if anybody bites if true, but man if I’m SD, just give me the prospect haul. 

his contract is an albatross, I don't know who could just take that on beyond the yankees or dodgers

24.5 million a year until 2033

Edited by Tangled Up in Plaid
Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

his contract is an albatross, I don't know who could just take that on beyond the yankees or dodgers

24.5 million a year until 2033

Right and why would SD want to limit their return? Just eat it and get the prospects. Nobody is taking on enough of that contract to where it even makes sense for SD. Even if they ate half of it, you’re still not getting anything for Miller. I mean I bet they would love to get out from under it, but it ain’t happening. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
9 minutes ago, JD94 said:

I haven’t seen it, nor have I cared to look, but I had 2 buddies tell me today they read that SD insists on somebody eating the Bogaerts contract in any Mason Miller trade. Maybe that’s them just throwing it out there to see if anybody bites if true, but man if I’m SD, just give me the prospect haul. 

IMO it would be incredibly stupid for the Padres to lessen their prospect haul by making someone take Bogaerts too. Get the best prospects you can get. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Passan says Mason Miller is definitely available

I mentioned this a few weeks back but I do think there's some merit to just steering into the skid rotation-wise and going bullpen of doom.

Like don't totally punt on the rotation, but e.g. use one of your blue chippers on Mason Miller and then pair that with something like a Freddy Peralta/Luke Weaver trade (which given Peralta's struggles should be doable with just mid-level guys).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...