Jump to content
North Side Baseball
North Side Contributor
Posted
4 minutes ago, soccer10k said:

LOL. Sure, in between those two starts where he gave up 15 combined runs, he wasn't that bad!

No doubt those starts were bad. But he had 60 IP after a terrible start against the White Sox. Do you think after you post a 3.69 ERA and a 3.79 xFIP over 60 innings someone should have said "I know what we should do: tear it all down!" You and I both know that would be stupid. 

 It's pretty obvious something got much worse with Shota starting that last start and has carried through to now over his last three. But there really wasn't much concern in his profile prior to that last start of the season that suggested an implosion was about to hit right then, either. 

  • Replies 744
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
4 minutes ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

Injured or not, it sucks that Kyle Tucker has completely let Ricketts off the hook.  Nobody will even bat an eye when the Cubs let him walk.

I couldn't have said this 3 months ago, but I can't blame Ricketts once he lets him walk now

Posted (edited)

Shota leads baseball in flyball rate and also HR/9.  Not a coincidence obviously.   They might want to fix that.   If you give up 29% groundballs and you're not K'ing everyone you're probably going to suck.

I'm no expert but rule of thumb is you either get the ball way up, way inside, or otherwise keep it low and away or at least away so they can't pull.

Edited by Stratos
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Wilson A2000 said:

I couldn't have said this 3 months ago, but I can't blame Ricketts once he lets him walk now

Absolutely, and that's what I meant.  The Cubs weren't going to re-sign him regardless, but now Jed and Tom can stand behind it being the right baseball decision to let him walk and nobody can really argue with that.

They were going to do the wrong thing for the wrong reasons.  Now it's the right thing and the reason no longer matters.

Edited by Irrelevant Dude
Posted
9 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

Sorry dude. But the Cubs aren’t just going through the motions. Brewers are just beating them. So you really think the Cubs aren’t trying? I mean, really? Take a second and think how ridiculous that statement sounds.

Sure they are now, watch the body language 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Derwood said:

Cubs can't even hit foul balls correctly. Everything just barely staying in play for easy outs

That’s because they gave up. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Wilson A2000 said:

I couldn't have said this 3 months ago, but I can't blame Ricketts once he lets him walk now

They could buy low on him.  The worry is if he's still injured in the hand.  But i guess the Cubs would know better than anyone.

But I don't think Tucker will accept any deal without opt-outs out the ying yang.

Posted
Just now, Stratos said:

They could buy low on him.  The worry is if he's still injured in the hand.  But i guess the Cubs would know better than anyone.

But I don't think Tucker will accept any deal without opt-outs out the ying yang.

He's been injured the last 2 years. Maybe he doesn't want many, if any, opt outs. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Stratos said:

They could buy low on him.  The worry is if he's still injured in the hand.  But i guess the Cubs would know better than anyone.

But I don't think Tucker will accept any deal without opt-outs out the ying yang.

Yeah, he could go the Bregman route if he feels he isn't getting fair value.

Posted
Just now, Caesar said:

Counsel is flat out dumb!

Didn’t think we could get through a thread where the Cubs are losing without your expert analysis. So please, Mr baseball, tell us why Counsell is dumb, now? 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

No doubt those starts were bad. But he had 60 IP after a terrible start against the White Sox. Do you think after you post a 3.69 ERA and a 3.79 xFIP over 60 innings someone should have said "I know what we should do: tear it all down!" You and I both know that would be stupid. 

 It's pretty obvious something got much worse with Shota starting that last start and has carried through to now over his last three. But there really wasn't much concern in his profile prior to that last start of the season that suggested an implosion was about to hit right then, either. 

it’s not clear to me that if we had “torn it all down” that we’d be in any worse a position than we are right now

Posted
Just now, Rcal10 said:

Didn’t think we could get through a thread where the Cubs are losing without your expert analysis. So please, Mr baseball, tell us why Counsell is dumb, now? 

I wouldn't even engage with this guy anymore. Almost seems like a troll at this point.

North Side Contributor
Posted
Just now, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Yeah, he could go the Bregman route if he feels he isn't getting fair value.

With the potential of a lockout looming, I think there is a zero chance he's taking the short term, high AAV deal. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Wilson A2000 said:

I couldn't have said this 3 months ago, but I can't blame Ricketts once he lets him walk now

Turned out that the we paid too high a price for the Tucker rental.

Posted
1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

Didn’t think we could get through a thread where the Cubs are losing without your expert analysis. So please, Mr baseball, tell us why Counsell is dumb, now? 

Why use Rea now? Should’ve started one of the 2 games or immediately relieved Shota. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

With the potential of a lockout looming, I think there is a zero chance he's taking the short term, high AAV deal. 

Won't the injury history serve as a big deterrent?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Yeah, he could go the Bregman route if he feels he isn't getting fair value.

He's young enough I think he still gets a very good deal with opt outs if the medicals check out ok.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

With the potential of a lockout looming, I think there is a zero chance he's taking the short term, high AAV deal. 

How does a contract work in a lock out? Why should it matter if he got a short term deal with opt outs the first 3 years? Is he paid anyway, if he opts in? 

North Side Contributor
Posted
Just now, SpongeWorthy said:

it’s not clear to me that if we had “torn it all down” that we’d be in any worse a position than we are right now

Teams don't make drastic decisions based on one start. Remember, until his last start of the year, he had posted a 60 IP (10 start) sample in which his ERA and his xFIP matched. His K% was up, and his walk rate was down. The one flag was an inflated HR rate, but xFIP factors this in. Pitchers have bad starts. Even really good pitchers have bad starts. Teams don't change arm slots by 5-degrees because of them. That's an offseason type of a change. 

So yeah, it hasn't gone well over his last three starts. But being realistic with ourselves, a mechanical change like this isn't something any team is going to try to implement on the fly. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

How does a contract work in a lock out? Why should it matter if he got a short term deal with opt outs the first 3 years? Is he paid anyway, if he opts in? 

My guess is that a salary cap is coming and you better get the big money before the cap sets in

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...