Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 349
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Tampa could get a nice haul for Kiermaier

I was hoping the Cardinals would really overpay for him instead of signing Dexter

word is the Astros were a bit down on him

??

Posted
Tampa could get a nice haul for Kiermaier

I was hoping the Cardinals would really overpay for him instead of signing Dexter

word is the Astros were a bit down on him

Don't know how this went over my head, but nice job

Posted

Seems so weird to think that Cahill was once so highly valued. He'll be a nice swing man for them.

 

The Mariners offseason has been interesting, to say the least. Almost all the moves could be criticized individually, but I can't help but look at the end product and think ... it might be a better squad, and I'm not sure they gave up that much long term potential to be that hugely concerned about. Going to be curious how it plays out. Always liked Smyly enough. Could see him really take off there.

Posted
Royals and Duffy agree to a 5/65 extension. Seems really cheap, he probably would've gotten $100+ million next offseason on the open market. Don't blame him for locking in significant money though to mitigate an injury/regression.
Posted
Duffy's got some talent but I'm glad both he and Ross are off the market. The fewer arm surgeries on staff the better.

 

You've got some weird takes man...We probably would be signing T. Ross to an incentive-laden 1 yr deal w/ a possible option for next yr. There is honestly no way that deal could end badly because anything he gives us is a bonus and a boost. We weren't counting on him, but he could've helped us in the second-half next season.

 

I'm also NOT happy that Duffy is off the market now, and I think most of us aren't thrilled he re-upped with the Royals. Good for him (and the Royals), but that isn't a good thing for the Cubs. I trust the Cubs FO to properly evaluate pitchers, and I'm pretty sure they won't be avoiding all pitchers who have some history of arm/shoulder problems because that's a very LARGE pool of talented pitchers.

Posted
You've got some weird takes man...We probably would be signing T. Ross to an incentive-laden 1 yr deal w/ a possible option for next yr. There is honestly no way that deal could end badly because anything he gives us is a bonus and a boost. We weren't counting on him, but he could've helped us in the second-half next season.

 

I'm also NOT happy that Duffy is off the market now, and I think most of us aren't thrilled he re-upped with the Royals. Good for him (and the Royals), but that isn't a good thing for the Cubs. I trust the Cubs FO to properly evaluate pitchers, and I'm pretty sure they won't be avoiding all pitchers who have some history of arm/shoulder problems because that's a very LARGE pool of talented pitchers.

 

Yeah, if it's weird to largely not want surgeried pitchers then I'll somehow trudge on with that label. You say they probably would sign Ross, but they didn't despite him coming cheap, low commit, and supposedly with zero risk on the Cubs' end based on reasons. Both of these guys don't just have some history with arm injuries, they have long histories throughout the pros and at least one major surgery under their belts apiece (Ross with at least two, including a major shoulder being rehabbed now).

 

http://www.csnchicago.com/chicago-cubs/why-tyson-ross-chose-rangers-over-cubs

 

I meant if they sign Ross they would probably sign him to an incentive-laden 1-yr deal with a possible option for next season. It seems like the offers were pretty close between us and the Rangers. The Cubs were trying to sign him and Theo explained why T. Ross chose the Rangers over us. They (The Cubs) weren't afraid of his injury history and were willing to commit $6+ million with incentives depending on how many innings he reached. It doesn't really matter regarding the injury history if it's a 1-yr deal...

 

Maybe committing to Duffy for multiple years would carry some risk depending on what the MRI and a physical might show. Still, I'd rather he be available with a chance to look at his medicals and then decide whether it's worth it or not.

 

Anyway, I guess I could've responded to your statement with this instead:

 

http://i.imgur.com/dUmkhiF.gif

Posted
You've got some weird takes man...We probably would be signing T. Ross to an incentive-laden 1 yr deal w/ a possible option for next yr. There is honestly no way that deal could end badly because anything he gives us is a bonus and a boost. We weren't counting on him, but he could've helped us in the second-half next season.

 

I'm also NOT happy that Duffy is off the market now, and I think most of us aren't thrilled he re-upped with the Royals. Good for him (and the Royals), but that isn't a good thing for the Cubs. I trust the Cubs FO to properly evaluate pitchers, and I'm pretty sure they won't be avoiding all pitchers who have some history of arm/shoulder problems because that's a very LARGE pool of talented pitchers.

 

Yeah, if it's weird to largely not want surgeried pitchers then I'll somehow trudge on with that label. You say they probably would sign Ross, but they didn't despite him coming cheap, low commit, and supposedly with zero risk on the Cubs' end based on reasons. Both of these guys don't just have some history with arm injuries, they have long histories throughout the pros and at least one major surgery under their belts apiece (Ross with at least two, including a major shoulder being rehabbed now).

 

Even if you're not interested in signing Duffy, him going off the market next offseason is a bad thing for the Cubs because it eliminates one option for a higher end arm that competing teams can focus on in free agency. It's a scarce market and one of the better options just went off the market.

Posted
Got it, there is only one point/hot take to be made. Without the opportunity to consider paying Duffy FA dollars and years next year the Cubs will have to make some major adjustments on the fly.

 

is the point just flying over your head or something?

 

his post was about the fact that more options on the FA market is a good thing. the cubs don't have to even consider signing him for that to be true. he LITERALLY said that. what is reading comprehension?

Posted
This doesn't affect every team equally, and no one is more set up to be less affected than the Cubs.

I could not disagree more.

 

 

Few teams will be under more pressure to sign a free agent pitcher this coming offseason than the Cubs. They have to do it, and the lower the supply, the more difficult it will be for them to do it.

Posted
The damage here is really what - they're now under marginally more pressure to focus on extending their healthy, in-house ace they rode to an NCLS and WS ring?

 

The damage is that the Cubs are basically guaranteed to be playing in the FA market for at least one SP next year, and one of the potential options disappeared. Even if the Cubs had zero interest(I didn't really think he was all that interesting, but I think Tyson Ross is dead and the FO sure didn't), that's bad. It's not 'oh no how will they cope' bad, but inarguably bad nonetheless.

Posted
This doesn't affect every team equally, and no one is more set up to be less affected than the Cubs.

I could not disagree more.

 

 

Few teams will be under more pressure to sign a free agent pitcher this coming offseason than the Cubs. They have to do it, and the lower the supply, the more difficult it will be for them to do it.

 

Fair enough, but this is at least a heavily mitigated by the healthiest TOR FA arm being inside the org and the depth to make multiple trades of various sizes for pitching. Locking up Arrieta OR making a significant trade for a Teheran/Archer/someone suddenly turns that FA class into a hunt to fill up the BOR - and that was largely the case before Duffy signed his extension.

but they almost certainly do not want to sign Arrieta.

Posted

The packages for TOR types have been insane. The Cubs pulling the trigger on a deal for one seems extremely unlikely. Since it'd empty the system and likely cost ML contributors they continually say they're not trading.

 

Our next TOR addition will almost definitely be from FA.

Posted
Our next TOR addition will almost definitely be from FA.

 

If you'll forgive me being pedantic I think it's probably similarly likely that it's a trade+develop situation, a la Arrieta. Of course given the timing that means the trade+develop has to be Montgomery or someone who is added before opening day so maybe not exactly likely, but I wouldn't undersell the possibility of trading for a guy and fixing them.

Posted
The packages for TOR types have been insane. The Cubs pulling the trigger on a deal for one seems extremely unlikely. Since it'd empty the system and likely cost ML contributors they continually say they're not trading.

 

Our next TOR addition will almost definitely be from FA.

Agreed. Given the prices, it's going to take at least our top 3 prospects plus one of Baez or Schwarber to get a long-term piece. Not interested. I have to think that the FO is targeting somebody that will be on the FA market, considering they clearly have no interest in resigning Jake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...