Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I don't care if it's exciting. It's a way to produce runs when you're not doing it in the traditional sense. Station to station hasn't exactly worked that well these past few months.

That's what I hate most about it. People excuse it because, 'hey, you tried', when in fact you ran yourself out of an opportunity.

 

But where I disagree is that you are coming at it from the perspective that it fails every single time when it fact it works out more than it doesn't.

It needs to work out far more than it doesn't to justify it. Isn't it generally accepted that you have to successfully steal like 75-80% of the time for it to even be a neutral effect on your offense?

 

I believe that number is significantly lower in today's run enivronment, something like 66%.

  • Replies 331
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I don't care if it's exciting. It's a way to produce runs when you're not doing it in the traditional sense. Station to station hasn't exactly worked that well these past few months.

That's what I hate most about it. People excuse it because, 'hey, you tried', when in fact you ran yourself out of an opportunity.

 

But where I disagree is that you are coming at it from the perspective that it fails every single time when it fact it works out more than it doesn't.

 

It needs to work out more than just "more than it doesn't" to justify it and today they are 0-2. There is also no justification to be doing it with Schwarber, Bryant and Rizzo coming up and nobody out.

Posted

I don't care if it's exciting. It's a way to produce runs when you're not doing it in the traditional sense. Station to station hasn't exactly worked that well these past few months.

That's what I hate most about it. People excuse it because, 'hey, you tried', when in fact you ran yourself out of an opportunity.

 

But where I disagree is that you are coming at it from the perspective that it fails every single time when it fact it works out more than it doesn't.

It needs to work out far more than it doesn't to justify it. Isn't it generally accepted that you have to successfully steal like 75-80% of the time for it to even be a neutral effect on your offense?

 

I fucked my response up on my phone, but I was saying this convo is actually funny considering the Rockies are in this game because of stolen bases today.

Posted
Hmm that made me a little nervous when I saw that it was Schwarber and he didnt look like he had a great read on it.

 

shaky play in LF?

Posted
Hmm that made me a little nervous when I saw that it was Schwarber and he didnt look like he had a great read on it.

 

shaky play in LF?

 

kind of. its just more typical baseball that in the most clutch moments the balls always hit to the new guy.

Posted
I know we still haven't scored a ton of runs lately, but the offense seems so much more interesting with high OBP Fowler back.

 

It has really surprised me that he and Schwarbs having success somehow hasn't translated into a more consistent offense.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Would be nice if they could lay a 4 spot on the board this inning
Posted

CUBS are 42-19 (.689) when they score 3 runs or more.... 10-28 (.263) when they don't

CUBS are 31-3 (.912) when they allow fewer than 3 runs.... 21-44 (.323) when they don't

 

 

Go CUBS !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...