Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Here we go, 2004 all over again


UMFan83
 Share

Eyre took time out from eating hohos and injuring Derrek Lee to rip the Tribune for speculating about Dusty's job status. Sorry partner, if you don't like it, don't read the Tribune and cry us a river. You can use your millions of dollars you make playing a kids game to wipe your tears away.

 

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/cs-060709cubsbits,1,279692.story?coll=cs-home-headlines

 

Cubs reliever Scott Eyre on Sunday accused the Chicago Tribune of hurting the team's ability to play by focusing on Dusty Baker's job status instead of the game.

 

"I think if we keep playing the way we played this series, and if everyone would stop talking about Dusty's job, we could all play and relax a little more," Eyre said. "If something happens, it happens, but if everyone would stop talking about it, maybe it would take pressure off of everyone else.

 

For the love of Kent...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

That's like expecting everyone to ignore the elephant in the corner of the room. Dusty was brought here to make this team win, and he came within 5 outs of the WS. The next season, his team imploded in the final stretch and missed the playoffs altogether. Since then, the team under his watch has gone from bad to staggeringly awful. The issue of Dusty's future with this team cannot be ignored at this point by anyone. Sorry, Scott, but them's the breaks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can it Scott, if this team had been playing as advertised in the offseason, we wouldn't be in this position right now.

 

But unfortunately, you and your buddies have been playing piss-poor baseball, injuries or not. If you want the speculation to stop, step up and win. Don't whine about the media causing a distraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how many would be so forthcoming face to face....

 

Putting myself into Eyre's situation I might feel the same. It is obvious he has respect for Baker, I don't find it odd that he is supporting him. It is no secret the team has struggled, the Tribune knows that, Dusty knows that, so does Eyre. I don't think they are trying to lose. Dusty, faults and all, wants to win. I'm sure the team wants to win as well.

 

Saying Eyre took time out from eating ho-ho's and injuring Lee is ridiculous.

 

Come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all fairness, it probably is a huge distraction.

 

Even if they hate Dusty, he is for the time being, their coach and manager. Until he's fired, he's part of the team and they have to make the best of that situation. I would imagine a lot of players are torn.

 

That being said, I hope he gets canned tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ticked too if I was Scott. I wouldn't want to answer constant questions about my coach. Don't you think all of Bonds's teammates got tired of answering steroid questions about Bonds? I guarantee they did.

 

Who cares if Eyre says this about Baker. It didn't even sound like he was completely defending Dusty. The "if something happens, it happens" part definately doesn't sound like he's defending him. Eyre is repeating what Hendry has said, which is what you should be doing as an employee.

 

And I agree with Bruno and saying "Eyre took time out from eating hohos and injuring Derrek Lee" is flat out uncalled for. First, Furcal injured Lee, not Eyre. HE'S BEEN OUR BEST RELIEVER THIS YEAR!! Why are you insulting a guy with a 2.41 ERA? Everyone overreacting about this needs to just can it. Insult Rusch and Neifi if you want to. But if Z said these quotes, would you be ripping into him as well? Didn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator

It's not a Sully story if it doesn't have a sharpened-jab-just beneath the ribs.

 

Eyre claimed general manager Jim Hendry "already came out and said [baker is] not in danger of losing his job, so stop talking about it. I'm tired of answering questions about it, honestly. … That's all anyone wants to talk about. I went on a radio show, and that's all they wanted to talk about. As players, the only control we have over whether a manager is here or not is to play.

 

Ouch!

 

I want Dusty gone. Doesn't appear that's going to happen anytime soon. This charade of "is Dusty going to be fired or not?" is embarrassing and an indictment of Hendry.

 

I'm sure it's tiresome for the players. If anything, it builds sympathy for Dusty. Nice job, Hendry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ticked too if I was Scott. I wouldn't want to answer constant questions about my coach. Don't you think all of Bonds's teammates got tired of answering steroid questions about Bonds? I guarantee they did.

 

Who cares if Eyre says this about Baker. It didn't even sound like he was completely defending Dusty. The "if something happens, it happens" part definately doesn't sound like he's defending him. Eyre is repeating what Hendry has said, which is what you should be doing as an employee.

 

And I agree with Bruno and saying "Eyre took time out from eating hohos and injuring Derrek Lee" is flat out uncalled for. First, Furcal injured Lee, not Eyre. HE'S BEEN OUR BEST RELIEVER THIS YEAR!! Why are you insulting a guy with a 2.41 ERA? Everyone overreacting about this needs to just can it. Insult Rusch and Neifi if you want to. But if Z said these quotes, would you be ripping into him as well? Didn't think so.

I agree mostly...it's got to get old when you are being asked about it 50 times a day and the players really have no inside info for the reporters. Plus what does the media think Eyre is going to say? "Yeah, fire the filthy bum!"

 

The one part of what Eyre said that I don't agree with though is:

Cubs reliever Scott Eyre on Sunday accused the Chicago Tribune of hurting the team's ability to play by focusing on Dusty Baker's job status instead of the game.

What was hurting the teams ability to play back in May before the controversey of Dusty's job status arose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one part of what Eyre said that I don't agree with though is:

ubs reliever Scott Eyre on Sunday accused the Chicago Tribune of hurting the team's ability to play by focusing on Dusty Baker's job status instead of the game.

What was hurting the teams ability to play back in May before the controversey of Dusty's job status arose?

 

Just another excuse and they get that from the thin skinned one. Hendry HAS to fire Baker now....he has to, there is no if, and, or but about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator
Since Hendry is too blind to see that a managerial change must be made, it's MacPhail's job to step in. If Hendry doesn't like MacPhail invading his territory, he can resign and the Cubs will be out from under the stupid extension they gave Hendry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ticked too if I was Scott. I wouldn't want to answer constant questions about my coach. Don't you think all of Bonds's teammates got tired of answering steroid questions about Bonds? I guarantee they did.

 

Who cares if Eyre says this about Baker. It didn't even sound like he was completely defending Dusty. The "if something happens, it happens" part definately doesn't sound like he's defending him. Eyre is repeating what Hendry has said, which is what you should be doing as an employee.

 

And I agree with Bruno and saying "Eyre took time out from eating hohos and injuring Derrek Lee" is flat out uncalled for. First, Furcal injured Lee, not Eyre. HE'S BEEN OUR BEST RELIEVER THIS YEAR!! Why are you insulting a guy with a 2.41 ERA? Everyone overreacting about this needs to just can it. Insult Rusch and Neifi if you want to. But if Z said these quotes, would you be ripping into him as well? Didn't think so.

I agree mostly...it's got to get old when you are being asked about it 50 times a day and the players really have no inside info for the reporters. Plus what does the media think Eyre is going to say? "Yeah, fire the filthy bum!"

 

The one part of what Eyre said that I don't agree with though is:

Cubs reliever Scott Eyre on Sunday accused the Chicago Tribune of hurting the team's ability to play by focusing on Dusty Baker's job status instead of the game.

What was hurting the teams ability to play back in May before the controversey of Dusty's job status arose?

 

I'll give you that. It's a valid point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...