Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

How the horsefeathers do you follow up a 20 run win with a 17+ run loss? I’d be surprised if this isn’t some kind of record. Embarrassing.


Give Jed Hoyer full authority to sign and trade for pitchers. 

Edited by JHBulls
Posted
5 minutes ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

How the horsefeathers do you follow up a 20 run win with a 17+ run loss? I’d be surprised if this isn’t some kind of record. .

There was a day off in-between the games. How do you have a performance like this coming off a day off?

Cubs better win the weekend to make up for this crap. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
23 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

Probably wasn’t Lake Michigan either.

Twasnt. South Carolina. I don't know what the name is however. It's...warm at least. A fish did bite me though. That was rude. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted

It sucks. Believe me, I was there and left very early. But it is one game. Would it have been better if they lost 5-4 blowing a 9th inning lead. One horrendous game. Turn the page. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

It sucks. Believe me, I was there and left very early. But it is one game. Would it have been better if they lost 5-4 blowing a 9th inning lead. One horrendous game. Turn the page. 

Yep. Win tomorrow.

Posted

Cubs got 23 Wednesday,  the way this offense goes in spurts, they probably wont total 23 these last 10 games to the break 😳 

Now go get 20 tomorrow dammit 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Wilson A2000 said:

 

In other words, the Cubs are the first team in history to win one game by 20+ runs but then lose the next by 15+ runs. 

Edited by Geographyhater8888
Posted
12 hours ago, JHBulls said:


Give Jed Hoyer full authority to sign and trade for pitchers. 

As President of Baseball Operations, he pretty much has the full authority to sign and trade for pitchers.  The budget is miles ahead of every other team in the division, so apparently, he is not good at his job.

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Backtobanks said:

As President of Baseball Operations, he pretty much has the full authority to sign and trade for pitchers.  The budget is miles ahead of every other team in the division, so apparently, he is not good at his job.

Not going to argue he is great at his job, but you leave a lot out with going to “not good”. Since the start of the 2023 season the Cubs have won 307 games. They are 11th in baseball in wins. 1 games out of a tie for 6th. Aside from the Rays, Brewers and Orioles (whose record is really due to one great year) all the teams ahead of them have spent more money. Aside from the Brewers the next best team in the division is 25 wins behind them. While the Cubs can spend more and act like a big market his hands are tied every year to be under the LT(except, finally, this year). While you are correct that he does spend more, the rest of the division gets advantages the Cubs don’t get. Spending more only tries to balance the teams out. But when you don’t take full advantage if your advantage due to ownership, you are actually playing at a disadvantage. If you want to say the Brewers are a much better FO, I agree. Same with the Rays.  But if the bar is the Brewers than every FO with the exception of the Rays and Dodgers is bad. Jed is not the best POBO in the game. Far from it. But he is far from bad and far from the worst. Cubs can do much worse. 

Edited by Rcal10
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Backtobanks said:

As President of Baseball Operations, he pretty much has the full authority to sign and trade for pitchers.  The budget is miles ahead of every other team in the division, so apparently, he is not good at his job.

Ask David Stearns if a fringe top 10 payroll (top 2 and over $100 million more than the Cubs in his case) is some GM life hack to building a championship roster after what he ‘built’ in Milwaukee. Jed isn’t perfect but let’s not pretend that he has an unlimited allowance either. The Brewers, Rays and Cleveland are outliers.

His biggest mistake has been neglecting drafting pitching in the later rounds. Hence filling out the pitching staff with middling vets, eating away at the payroll thanks to a lack of reinforcements in the minors. 

Besides, it’s Craig counsels fault anyways.

Edited by Geographyhater8888
Posted
11 minutes ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

Ask David Stearns if a fringe top 10 payroll (top 2 and over $100 million more than the Cubs in his case) is some GM life hack to building a championship roster after what he ‘built’ in Milwaukee. Jed isn’t perfect but let’s not pretend that he has an unlimited allowance either. The Brewers, Rays and Cleveland are outliers.

His biggest mistake has been neglecting drafting pitching in the later rounds. Hence filling out the pitching staff with middling vets, eating away at the payroll thanks to a lack of reinforcements in the minors. 

Besides, it’s Craig counsels fault anyways.

I was fully on board with you until the last sentence😬. But seriously, I agree about Jed. As I said, he isn’t great, but he isn’t terrible either. I think if he is moved it is more likely we get someone worse than someone better. 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

I was fully on board with you until the last sentence😬. But seriously, I agree about Jed. As I said, he isn’t great, but he isn’t terrible either. I think if he is moved it is more likely we get someone worse than someone better. 

I just don’t like using the Brewers as an example. No one knows how they do it and evidently neither does their former GM who’s employed by Steve Cohen. Unless you’re Dave Dombrowski with permission from ownership to spend as much as he wants, which doesn’t always work, you’re stuck meeting half way between playoff contention while keeping an eye on 2028. 
 

Draft more pitching and stop worrying about attrition. Maybe if you had a few quality farm arms instead of blocked positional prospects, that $ spent on Maton, Milner and other number 4 starters could’ve been used on a legitimate top of the rotation pitcher. Easier said than done but it’s not like the team is crippled financially either like the Padres for example. 
 

Edited by Geographyhater8888

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...