Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted

I think this Board undervalues Ballestros. With robo umps coming next season framing concerns are gone. 

  • Like 2
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

North Side Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Bertz said:

4.98 ERA/5.01 xFIP since late June for Morton.  Basically as soon as people started noticing he wasn't quite cooked he went back in the oven.

It'd be real embarrassing if someone wrote a long article right around that time period advocating for him only for him to tank his value. Real embarassing.

Interested Saturday Night Live GIF by HULU

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, Neuby said:

I think this Board undervalues Ballestros. With robo umps coming next season framing concerns are gone. 

Perhaps, but he's begging for future knee/hip trouble if he's a full time catcher at his current weight.

North Side Contributor
Posted
Just now, Chicago Al said:

If Caissie isn’t moved this TDL, does he get called up and split some time with the outfielders? Bench role?

Probably not. Maybe some time in September. He doesn't help an OF that's already heavily LHH and he won't add defense or base running. As well, I expect lots of K's on his initial callup. 

Maybe we see him on the bench in September, but more likely, he hangs out in Iowa. It won't kill him.

  • Like 1
North Side Contributor
Posted
6 minutes ago, Neuby said:

I think this Board undervalues Ballestros. With robo umps coming next season framing concerns are gone. 

His footwork needs a lot of help still too. It's not just that he's a bad framer, he's awkward. It could get there! But his shape kind of makes it more risky.

Also, just leaving this here...

If he's a catcher that's more than acceptable! As a DH?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Neuby said:

I think this Board undervalues Ballestros. With robo umps coming next season framing concerns are gone. 

The defensive concerns are more than just framing, he's only throwing out 13% of baserunners and has 14 passed balls in about 100 AAA games.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

It'd be real embarrassing if someone wrote a long article right around that time period advocating for him only for him to tank his value. Real embarassing.

Interested Saturday Night Live GIF by HULU

 

I was actively pushing for him too. I am now off that ship. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

The defensive concerns are more than just framing, he's only throwing out 13% of baserunners and has 14 passed balls in about 100 AAA games.

But other than that he's basically Pudge Rodriguez

  • Haha 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 minute ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

The defensive concerns are more than just framing, he's only throwing out 13% of baserunners and has 14 passed balls in about 100 AAA games.

The throwing numbers are concerning but he's also working with a minor league staff. He has the

arm.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Neuby said:

I think this Board undervalues Ballestros. With robo umps coming next season framing concerns are gone. 

He's a stud.  Great bat.  He's a plug and play DH with upside as a catcher.  Wish the Cubs had a spot for him but they are already very lefty heavy.  

North Side Contributor
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rex Buckingham said:

I think the Ballesteros thing is mostly, "We're not including him in this package" more than he isn't available

BN just wrote about that in the same way. I don't love their opinions, but we also have to remember that Cerami works there and he's been pretty on it. He reports in this way, the quiet winks and nods and comments, so I do think that this is probably coming from a decent place.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Rex Buckingham said:

I think the Ballesteros thing is mostly, "We're not including him in this package" more than he isn't available

Didn't Jed say nobody is untouchable like a week ago? There's even a thread with that exact title. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ILMindState said:

Didn't Jed say nobody is untouchable like a week ago? There's even a thread with that exact title. 

yeah, that why I think it's more about the package than Mo... I think they'd be fine moving him, if the value is right (same as it ever was, with Jed)

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...