We won't win with Wood

[BudHouse]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

[SouthSideRyan]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

 

That's an 80% rate.

[David]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

 

That's an 80% rate.

 

 

Wow. That is some tasty irony.

[jersey cubs fan]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

 

That's an 80% rate.

 

 

Wow. That is some tasty irony.

 

That's well beyond basic math.

[Tracer Bullet]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

 

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

[Derwood]

i was told there would be no math

[Soul]

Hehehe. I seem to remember posting some stats that were wrong on here, too :blush:

 

Now I just try to leave the math to others. Much better plan.

[abuck1220]

his save % gets even worse if you believe that 16/20 equals 50%. think about that for a minute.

[David]

his save % gets even worse if you believe that 16/20 equals 50%. think about that for a minute.

 

abuck has jokes :shock:

[bukie]

Even more concerning are his numbers in games where he's blown a save:

 

5 IP

7 H

6 ER

5 BB/HB/IBB

2.40 WHIP

10.80 ERA

.300 AVG/.440 OBP/.700 SLG/1.140 OPS

0 Saves

4 Blown Saves

Save % -∞

[USSoccer]

He's using imaginary numbers. Eleventeen, thirtytwelve, etc.

[Sammy Sofa]

Stupid Smarch sham saves.

[CuseCubFan69]

Hehehe. I seem to remember posting some stats that were wrong on here, too :blush:

 

Now I just try to leave the math to others. Much better plan.

 

Some posters get a Woody 75% of the time when they find a math error or 4 out of 5 times. :thumbsup:

[Ding Dong Johnson]

it's a little known fact that 4 out of every 5 people make up 75% of the world's population

[Coach C]

4/5 = 75%?

 

*Scratches my head in confusion. Acknowledge that does not compute, shrugs and walks away*

[Guest]

Just a comment on notation. Usually when someone says 3+ that means 3 or more, so I think he's OK on that.

 

No wonder they make no sense when they can't understand the basics.

 

Non-Save Appearances--11

Saves-16

Blown Saves -4

Save %-75%

 

That's an 80% rate.

 

 

Wow. That is some tasty irony.

 

That's well beyond basic math.

 

Basic math is not old school.

[TruffleShuffle]

Even more concerning are his numbers in games where he's blown a save:

 

5 IP

7 H

6 ER

5 BB/HB/IBB

2.40 WHIP

10.80 ERA

.300 AVG/.440 OBP/.700 SLG/1.140 OPS

0 Saves

4 Blown Saves

Save % -∞

 

wow jeez that is terrible. okay i've seen the light, he is a sham.

[Roast]

Hahahahaha. I got on here today hoping this thread would have become even more awesome with Budhouse making things up to defend his ridiculous stance and...oh my god it's like christmas.

[Roast]

NL Save Leader.....17 saves.

[BigSlick]

Oh, this is who budhouse is

 

Lol his save percentage in games he's blown is minus infinity, glorious

Edited June 6, 2008 by BigSlick

[BCVM22]

Sham closer tried to give me a soapdropping sham heart attack.

[CubmanPi]

NL Save Leader.....17 saves.

Tallest midget. That's only good for T-3rd in the American League. Sham division in a sham league.

[BigbadB]

Could Kerry Wood be that starting pitcher the Cubs are hoping to find at the trade deadline?

 

Assuming the Cubs stretch out their division lead, what are the chances that they could slide Marmol into the closer role, trade for a set up man (much cheaper than a Burnett or a Sabathia in terms of talent and cost), and allow Kerry to get stretched back out in the last month or so of the season, and let Kerry be that #2 we seek?

 

It will have been nearly 2 years since Kerry started, and it was assumed that relief would only be a temporary thing to allow further healing of his surgically repaired parts. He's been going on short rest, back to back to back days, etc... Is it possible that he might be ready to make the move back into the rotation? Or does he prefer his bullpen role?

[CuseCubFan69]

Could Kerry Wood be that starting pitcher the Cubs are hoping to find at the trade deadline?

 

Assuming the Cubs stretch out their division lead, what are the chances that they could slide Marmol into the closer role, trade for a set up man (much cheaper than a Burnett or a Sabathia in terms of talent and cost), and allow Kerry to get stretched back out in the last month or so of the season, and let Kerry be that #2 we seek?

 

It will have been nearly 2 years since Kerry started, and it was assumed that relief would only be a temporary thing to allow further healing of his surgically repaired parts. He's been going on short rest, back to back to back days, etc... Is it possible that he might be ready to make the move back into the rotation? Or does he prefer his bullpen role?

 

That's a possibility but I wonder if he'll look at Smoltz and say, no thank you.

[C.C.]

Could Kerry Wood be that starting pitcher the Cubs are hoping to find at the trade deadline?

 

Assuming the Cubs stretch out their division lead, what are the chances that they could slide Marmol into the closer role, trade for a set up man (much cheaper than a Burnett or a Sabathia in terms of talent and cost), and allow Kerry to get stretched back out in the last month or so of the season, and let Kerry be that #2 we seek?

 

It will have been nearly 2 years since Kerry started, and it was assumed that relief would only be a temporary thing to allow further healing of his surgically repaired parts. He's been going on short rest, back to back to back days, etc... Is it possible that he might be ready to make the move back into the rotation? Or does he prefer his bullpen role?

 

And if he gets hurt? I'd rather see Kerry healthy for a full year in the pen and then perhaps next year make him a starter again.