Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

The trade doesn't really make sense for either team.

 

The sox should be blowing this thing up, but they are moving in the opposite direction. To their credit, they just traded a Type B FA for a Type A FA. With Garland being better in 06 and OCab being better in 07, unless anything drastic happens they will probably stay in those types. He also frees up money, but he'll probably spend it foolishly on Hunter/Rowand. Unfortunately for him, he picked up Uribe's option and theres no market for trading him.

 

On the Angels side of the table, they have competent youngsters that could step in and do just as well if not better than Garland. However, Garland is going to a better park for pitchers, maybe they think his HR will cut down.

 

Both players are well overrated and as of now don't fit into either team's plans. We'll have to see how this one plays out, but I think we just saw a trade between two organizations that have no clue where they are/should be going.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Does this save the Sox any money? If i recall correctly i think Cabrera makes 8 mil a year. If that is the case are the Angels sending over some money?
Posted
I know Garland isn't great, but this is still a really stupid trade. Cabrera isn't all that good, and I don't see how the White Sox are any better after this deal.

 

Why resign Uribe if you're going to trade for Cabrera?

 

When you say Cabrera "isn't all that good," do you mean you think he's unlikely to reproduce his 2007 season?

 

Because he was the best shortstop in the AL last year by WARP3, barely edging out Young and Jeter.

Posted

Actually a proactive trade. Sox were not going to resign Garland, they are going to re-up Cabrera and they have now a huge upgrade at SS in return for a pitcher that won 10 games last year.

 

And if they don't trade Uribe, they have a guy who can play a pretty decent sub role.

Posted
I know Garland isn't great, but this is still a really stupid trade. Cabrera isn't all that good, and I don't see how the White Sox are any better after this deal.

 

Why resign Uribe if you're going to trade for Cabrera?

 

When you say Cabrera "isn't all that good," do you mean you think he's unlikely to reproduce his 2007 season?

 

Because he was the best shortstop in the AL last year by WARP3, barely edging out Young and Jeter.

.

 

Yes, this is what I mean.

Posted
Maybe Kenny knows the Cubs are in the market for a SS and covets someone in particular that we have got. Might he try to turn around and flip O.Cab to us for something like Marshall+Murton? I'm not suggesting the trade by any means, just wondering what the Sox might be up to. Also I would think that this makes Santana being involved in any M.Cabrera to the Angels trade much more likely.

 

Any deal that Hendry makes from now on has to include 1-2 crappy middle IF going to the other team to clear up our surplus.

 

I would disagree that the Cubs have a huge surplus right now if nobody else is signed as is rumored. Let's say DeRosa and Theriot are the starters. Infante is the right-handed platoon partner in CF and the backup to 2B and SS. Cedeno and Fontenot battle it out for the other bench spot, with Cedeno probably winning it.

 

It wouldn't be bad if 1 of the middle IF's left via trade, but I disagree that there is a massive surplus of them. It's just that there's only 1 pretty good one among the group, and a bunch that are struggling to make it to average.

 

Hendry has an entire offseason yet to add to his 2B/SS collection.

Posted
Cabrera is the best SS in Chicago by far.

 

Completely true. I doubt we could have acquired him though. I would've given up Marquis for him, but the Angels certainly wouldn't.

Posted
I could see this as a prelude to the Angels signing A-Rod or trading for Tejada.

 

You think the Yankees deal with A-Rod will fall apart? Seems awfully far along in the process combined with such a huge contract makes it incredibly unlikely IMO that one side would walk away now.

Posted
I could see this as a prelude to the Angels signing A-Rod or trading for Tejada.

 

You think the Yankees deal with A-Rod will fall apart? Seems awfully far along in the process combined with such a huge contract makes it incredibly unlikely IMO that one side would walk away now.

 

I'm not believing a word of it until the deal becomes official.

Posted
I liked Guillen and Peralta's seasons better; but as for Cabrera as a player it doesn't tell us anything. His fielding has been up, down, and average, and in 2006 his clutch numbers were as bad as 2007's were good.
Posted
While the sportswriters in the Tribune are gushing about this deal, I think the best part of it for the White Sox is getting money back in addition to Cabrera. The articles talk about "rebuilding", but I can't see how the WS can contend in 2008 when they have holes in LF, starting rotation (#3,#4,#5), and bullpen (3-4 spots) (assuming they will sign a CF). I think a better deal with the Angels would have been Garland for Aybar and Santana (assuming it would have been offered). The deal I suggested would really have them rebuilding for 2009 instead of pretending in 2008 with Thome and Dye getting older and pitchers like Danks, Floyd, and Gonzalez more experienced.
Posted
I could see this as a prelude to the Angels signing A-Rod or trading for Tejada.

 

You think the Yankees deal with A-Rod will fall apart? Seems awfully far along in the process combined with such a huge contract makes it incredibly unlikely IMO that one side would walk away now.

 

ARod deals have been far along in the process before while still falling through. There's no good reason why it hasn't been signed yet.

Posted
I could see this as a prelude to the Angels signing A-Rod or trading for Tejada.

 

You think the Yankees deal with A-Rod will fall apart? Seems awfully far along in the process combined with such a huge contract makes it incredibly unlikely IMO that one side would walk away now.

 

ARod deals have been far along in the process before while still falling through. There's no good reason why it hasn't been signed yet.

 

Indeed. Arod was traded to Boston. Then he wasn't.

Posted
I could see this as a prelude to the Angels signing A-Rod or trading for Tejada.

 

You think the Yankees deal with A-Rod will fall apart? Seems awfully far along in the process combined with such a huge contract makes it incredibly unlikely IMO that one side would walk away now.

 

ARod deals have been far along in the process before while still falling through. There's no good reason why it hasn't been signed yet.

 

Indeed. Arod was traded to Boston. Then he wasn't.

 

ARod himself said yesterday that talks were in "the bottom of the 5th inning".

Posted
my guess is that the Sox will play O-Cab at 3rd and try to trade Crede

 

There's no way that happens. Cabrera plays the most important position very effectively. They will try to trade Crede because of the uncertainty of his back and they have Fields to play 3B. Uribe will either move to 2B or be traded.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...