Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

Gotta update your $/WAR priors man, saying Bregman hasn't been worth $35 in three years is some 'back in my day we could get a milkshake for a nickel' stuff

Most FAs sign for 6-8M per WAR.

Edited by Cuzi
  • Like 1
  • Replies 337
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

They very much do not, market rate is a bit north of 10 million/WAR

It's not, but ok.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Man his team is gonna win a lot of games.  It doesn't have an ace or a cleanup hitter who's an Avengers level threat like Ohtani or Judge or Skubal, but god damn it's loaded with good players and even the very back end of the roster is quality situational guys.

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Derwood said:

Might want to check the numbers on Cease, Alonso, etc.

Cease signed for 8 on the dot.

I've already compared this to Alonsos deal.

Edited by Cuzi
  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
28 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

I know there are going to be many skeptical. But here's the thing: the team who we call claim doesn't give a horsefeathers just gave a horsefeathers enough to go over the LT for a player. 

That tells us something in the models we have doesn't match up with the models the Cubs have. 

I suspect there's a little bit of a manual bump for makeup, a little bit of pricing in not having to give up the draft pick, and a little bit of bidding more aggressively to prevent a situation like last year where theyre left holding the bag from happening again.

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
6 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

Cease signed for 8 on the dot.

I've already compared this to Alonsos deal.

Cease has 21 career fWAR and signed for $30M AAV. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
3 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Bregman Tucker Reunion 😁

That will be perfect!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, Derwood said:

Cease has 21 career fWAR and signed for $30M AAV. 

No one uses career WAR when calculating dollar per WAR.

He's been a 3-4 WAR pitcher for 5 straight years. Put up 3.4 last year and his contract is for $27M AAV. Divide 27 by 3.4. Tell me what you get.

  • Like 1
North Side Contributor
Posted
13 minutes ago, Bertz said:

I suspect there's a little bit of a manual bump for makeup, a little bit of pricing in not having to give up the draft pick, and a little bit of bidding more aggressively to prevent a situation like last year where theyre left holding the bag from happening again.

For better or worse it feels like the Hoyer version of Jon Lester. Or at least what they hope is that. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
6 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

No one uses career WAR when calculating dollar per WAR.

He's been a 3-4 WAR pitcher for 5 straight years. Put up 3.4 last year and his contract is for $27M AAV. Divide 27 by 3.4. Tell me what you get.

He signed 7/$210, which is $30/year. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)

I’m struggling to see why Jed seems so obsessed with Bregman. Hope it works. If it doesn’t? I fear it scares tom and Jed off more from high money deals. 

Edited by ToolDRT
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Just now, Derwood said:

He signed 7/$210, which is $30/year. 

Get back to me when you actually look at his contract.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

No one uses career WAR when calculating dollar per WAR.

He's been a 3-4 WAR pitcher for 5 straight years. Put up 3.4 last year and his contract is for $27M AAV. Divide 27 by 3.4. Tell me what you get.

No one expects Cease to put up nearly 25 WAR over his deal, if they did he would've gotten another 50 million.  The market rate for FA is not dividing AAV by last year or this year's projected WAR, it's about expectations for the entirety of the contract which will inevitably have age-related decline in long term deals(never mind injury risk, especially for pitchers).

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

No one expects Cease to put up nearly 25 WAR over his deal, if they did he would've gotten another 50 million.  The market rate for FA is not dividing AAV by last year or this year's projected WAR, it's about expectations for the entirety of the contract which will inevitably have age-related decline in long term deals(never mind injury risk, especially for pitchers).

Use projected WAR then. Cease is projected at 3.8. Guess what? That's 7.1.

Fangraphs latest article on the study ended in 2022 and was trending down with $8.5M being the number for '22. So to sit here and say the market rate is a little over 10 is delusional.

Here is a recent article using Fangraphs numbers.

https://www.paraballnotes.com/blog/dollar-per-war-2025-2026

Last year it was 7.8.

No where near a tick over 10.

Edited by Cuzi
Old-Timey Member
Posted

At the end of the day, Bregman needs around 20 fWAR over his 5 years to hit value. All that matters is Jed and company believe he’ll land close to that with their internal projections. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Cuzi said:

Use projected WAR then. Cease is projected at 3.8. Guess what? That's 7.1.

Fangraphs latest article on the study ended in 2022 and was trending down with $8.5M being the number for '22. So to sit here and say the market rate is a little over 10 is delusional.

Again, that is not how $/WAR works.  You don't just take the first year of the deal and assume that's the productivity for the entirety of it.  You need to discount for age and injury, especially for a pitcher and a deal as long as Cease's. 

  • Like 2
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Just now, Transmogrified Tiger said:

Again, that is not how $/WAR works.  You don't just take the first year of the deal and assume that's the productivity for the entirety of it.  You need to discount for age and injury, especially for a pitcher and a deal as long as Cease's. 

You seem to make up your own rules for how it works. Meanwhile the studies on it don't agree with you.

  • Disagree 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

You seem to make up your own rules for how it works. Meanwhile the studies on it don't agree with you.

Smug and wrong is just the worst look.

I'd give the chances that you understand a single baseball thing better than TT <1%

  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...