Jump to content
North Side Baseball
North Side Contributor
Posted

Kevin Alcantara made his MLB debut at the very end of the 2024 season. How good do we think the Jaguar will be when he arrives again in 2025?

Image courtesy of © Kyle Ross-Imagn Images

We continue today looking at the Cubs' top 20 prospects (as ranked by our readers here at NSBB), with Kevin Alcantara, who comes in at No. 5 on that countdown. Before you read about him, though, don't miss our previous posts on the current state of the Cubs' farm system, with my looks at some honorable mentions, the Cubs' Top Prospects #20-16 and the Top Prospects #15-11
#20 - Pedro Ramirez, INF
#19 - Luis Vazquez, INF
#18 - Michael Arias, RP
#17 - Alfonsin Rosario - OF
#16 - Drew Gray, SP
#15 - Jonathon Long, 1B
#14 - Fernando Cruz, SS
#13 - Derniche Valdez, SS
#12 - Alexander Canario, OF
#11 - Cristian Hernandez, SS
#10 - Brandon Birdsell, SP
#9 - Jaxon Wiggins, SP
#8 - Jefferson Rojas
#7 - James Triantos 
#6 - Cam Smith


2024 Season Recap - Kevin Alcantara, OF
Kevin Alcantara, the prized return for the much beloved Anthony Rizzo, has been a part of the Cubs' organization for the better part of his career. From a personal standpoint, it feels as though he's been around much longer than he has been; acquired in the summer of 2021, he hasn't been here that long. Entering 2024, the tall, lanky outfielder was slated to see action in Tennessee but had an outside chance at making noise in Iowa if he stuck the landing, but I didn't have "get his first MLB hit" on my bingo card, either. 

Starting the 2024 campaign, however, Alcantara really struggled through his first 29 plate appearances, going hitless while striking out 11 times. Despite the no-good first week+, the outfielder found his footing and tore through the league after that point, hitting .298, striking out 23% of the time compared to a 9% walk rate, and posted a 142 wRC+ through a tough Southern League. It was great to see the K% remain low - Alcantara is a tall drink of water, and pitchers can sometimes use those long levers to their advantage. 

Alcantara's time in Tennessee would end in early August, as he was promoted to Triple-A Iowa on August 6th. It didn't take long for him to make himself at home, hitting a home run in only his second game. There were a lot of positives for "The Jaguar" in Iowa, hitting a robust .292, to go along with a 123 wRC+, an ISO approaching .200, and walking 11/5% of the time. If there was a knock (and there was a knock), the K% was elevated, inching ever so close to the 30% threshold. The K% reminds us that he's not a finished product and that progress must be made. The good news is that it's a smaller sample size for a 22-year-old making their debut at Iowa - so while it's notable, it's not something to worry about - more or less, just something he'll need to polish moving forward. Regardless, it ended up with him getting a call to the majors for the last week of the season and even getting his first MLB hit.


2025 Season Outlook and Scouting Report: ETA - Summer 2025
Kevin Alcantara is very close to making himself a mainstay at the MLB level. Entering the 2025 season, Alcantara will just be a few months shy of celebrating his 23rd rotation around the sun - meaning he's still very much on the young side of things. He's all but assured to make his season's start in Iowa with the Triple-A Iowa Cubs as he looks to refine some of his bat-to-ball skills and work towards alleviating some of the strikeouts. If he can do that, Kevin will be among those considered this summer for a return to Chicago if an injury happens to an outfielder, being in the conversation with Owen Caissie, another top-5 Cub prospect. Who will be called upon may be a question of "who got hurt?" with Caissie being more likely if Michael Busch or Kyle Tucker were to suffer from an injury, but Alcantara being the chosen one if PCA went down, for example. 

Where things get a little messy is that there's still plenty of offseason to go, and Kevin Alcantara isn't guaranteed to remain with the Cubs. The 6'6" Alcantara is blocked at his (current) primary position of center field, with Pete Crow-Armstrong the de facto starter, and it looks like he might be a very good regular. While Alcantara's bat and glove would easily play in right field as well, he's a bit of a unicorn considering there just are not a lot of 6'6" outfielders who can hold their own in center field as opposed to being relegated to a corner, which gives him a unique upside. While the Cubs' trade rumors have all but dried up, it doesn't mean they aren't or can't be working on something in the background. At some point, there may need to be an internal conversation about "Caissie or Alcantara?" as the team debates how to infuse more talent into the MLB side. It may not happen in the offseason, but he would remain a hot name come July at the trade deadline. 

Overall, the outfielder looks like an MLB power-hitting outfielder capable of playing center field for the interim and shifting to RF later. To unlock everything, Alcantara must learn how not to be beat up and in with heat and continue to refine his approach. If he can make those final tweaks to his game, whether in Chicago or elsewhere, there would be a real all-star upside in the total package: Kevin Alcantara.

What do you think of Kevin Alcantara? Do you think he will remain with the Cubs or be traded to another team? Do you think he has an all-star upside? Let us know in the comments below!


View full article

  • Like 1

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been really surprised at the lack of trade buzz around Alcantara this winter.  He's nominally blocked by PCA, the most exciting pure talent at Iowa (moreso than Shaw even), and a true CF in a winter where the options on the market there are quite sad. 

I'm wondering if the industry is softening on him, or the total opposite where he's played himself into something approaching untouchable status in the team's eyes.  The surprising late season callup plus the team not adding a true bench CFer this winter (it appears that will be covered by Canario and/or Brujan?) would seem to point to the latter.

Posted

When Jed talks about clean books, he’s tangentially talking about Alcantara, OWNKC, and PCA. Happ is on the last year of his contract and they already explored trading Suzuki. I’d like to see them extend Tucker, but I think we al know that’s going to be a challenge. 
 

So, if all goes well and they can’t retain Tucker there is room for all three of them. All never seems to go well though. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, grassbass said:

Happ is signed through 2026

I thought he signed a three year contract in 23. That would make 23, 24,, 25?

Posted
31 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

I thought he signed a three year contract in 23. That would make 23, 24,, 25?

Nope, Happ is signed thru 26’. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
2 hours ago, Bertz said:

I've been really surprised at the lack of trade buzz around Alcantara this winter.  He's nominally blocked by PCA, the most exciting pure talent at Iowa (moreso than Shaw even), and a true CF in a winter where the options on the market there are quite sad. 

I'm wondering if the industry is softening on him, or the total opposite where he's played himself into something approaching untouchable status in the team's eyes.  The surprising late season callup plus the team not adding a true bench CFer this winter (it appears that will be covered by Canario and/or Brujan?) would seem to point to the latter.

Ive been surprised as well to see him not be mentioned more. He feels like the guy the Cubs would be more willing to move and others should likely covet. AX Phil has him as very likely to get anothet option year as well (and he's usually spot on for those valuations). Youd think someone would be super enthused with him. 

Ive kind of viewed the team as pretty damn high on Caissie (just based on how they've moved him) and I guess I struggle to see a future with both as definitely finding a home in a Cubs OF with PCA. But maybe I'm just missing this and they viewed both as the future. Which is probably a good thing and somewhat of a bad thing (with how the Cubs are more tight pocketed than I think remains necessary the prospect hugging is a bit of a bug and a feature).

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

Ive been surprised as well to see him not be mentioned more. He feels like the guy the Cubs would be more willing to move and others should likely covet. AX Phil has him as very likely to get anothet option year as well (and he's usually spot on for those valuations). Youd think someone would be super enthused with him. 

Ive kind of viewed the team as pretty damn high on Caissie (just based on how they've moved him) and I guess I struggle to see a future with both as definitely finding a home in a Cubs OF with PCA. But maybe I'm just missing this and they viewed both as the future. Which is probably a good thing and somewhat of a bad thing (with how the Cubs are more tight pocketed than I think remains necessary the prospect hugging is a bit of a bug and a feature).

If I have to choose between Alcantara and Caissie, the choice isn't particularly difficult and it's not Caissie who may not be able to play an OF position at all.

But with the DH and whatnot, It's a lot easier to fit both on the team. Kevin can spell PCA on tough lefties and/or play all three OF positions (not at the same time). 

Edited by CubinNY
Posted
3 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

If I have to choose between Alcantara and Caissie, the choice isn't particularly difficult and it's not Caissie who may not be able to play an OF position at all.

Is Cassie that bad an outfielder? I thought he was actually decent in right with a good arm. I know he can’t play center and Alcantara is a solid centerfielder. But I didn’t think he was viewed as someone who can’t play a corner outfield spot. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

Ive been surprised as well to see him not be mentioned more. He feels like the guy the Cubs would be more willing to move and others should likely covet. AX Phil has him as very likely to get anothet option year as well (and he's usually spot on for those valuations). Youd think someone would be super enthused with him. 

Ive kind of viewed the team as pretty damn high on Caissie (just based on how they've moved him) and I guess I struggle to see a future with both as definitely finding a home in a Cubs OF with PCA. But maybe I'm just missing this and they viewed both as the future. Which is probably a good thing and somewhat of a bad thing (with how the Cubs are more tight pocketed than I think remains necessary the prospect hugging is a bit of a bug and a feature).

I do not want to "masterful gambit sir" having Colin Rea as the 5th starter, but if the team thinks they are sufficiently better than the Brewers there's a lot of logic to pushing the inevitable Alcantara/Caissie for a SP trade to July.  Especially now that we know Alcantara has an extra option.  AZ Phil's opinions are dumb meatball radio caller stuff, but he is legitimately an expert at the administrative aspects of minor league rosters.  I trust him implicitly there.

  • Like 2
North Side Contributor
Posted
43 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

If I have to choose between Alcantara and Caissie, the choice isn't particularly difficult and it's not Caissie who may not be able to play an OF position at all.

But with the DH and whatnot, It's a lot easier to fit both on the team. Kevin can spell PCA on tough lefties and/or play all three OF positions (not at the same time). 

Caissie's defense is much better than youre giving it credit for. He's got a legitimately plus arm and the athleticism isn't bad. Might he DH down the road? Sure. I don't particularly think it's imminent. But between the two, I'm choosing Caissie, myself. More on that, later. Don't want to give all of my secrets away.

Regardless, while you can envision a world where both can find time, there also comes a time when we have to ask the best usage of prospects. Alcantara's best usage is likely in center. And with Busch at 1b, Happ here for at least another 2 years, PCA here for 5...you have to wonder if the best usage for an OFer in the system (with other prospects who could also work as a COF in due time, or other draft picks backfilling some spots) isn't to use combinations of "Shaw or Triantos" and "Caissie or Alcantara" to create a player that the system is more or less missing. 

It's also a numbers game. I love our prospects, but we shouldn't expect them all to be a thing. Moving some for more established players may create a risk of trading the guys who do become regulars but it also mitigates your risk of having your entire future hinged on players you may or may not ever establish themselves, too. There's a push and pull of it. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
31 minutes ago, Bertz said:

I do not want to "masterful gambit sir" having Colin Rea as the 5th starter, but if the team thinks they are sufficiently better than the Brewers there's a lot of logic to pushing the inevitable Alcantara/Caissie for a SP trade to July.  Especially now that we know Alcantara has an extra option.  AZ Phil's opinions are dumb meatball radio caller stuff, but he is legitimately an expert at the administrative aspects of minor league rosters.  I trust him implicitly there.

Yeah, I've thought about this as well. As much as I don't love Rea, it does allow the Cubs options as the year goes. Horton or Brown or Birdsell could super force action there, or you could jump on a guy at the deadline. 

Posted

For 2026, I'd love to see an OF defense of Alcantara, PCA, and Tucker. Or, Happ, PCA, and Alcantara, if Tucker isn't resigned. This would help the pitching quite a bit. This article makes me think again about the Tucker trade. On paper, it would seem that Alcantara would've been a better fit for Houston than Smith in that trade. The Astros acquired two third basemen, even though they also need help in the OF. That probably means at least the Astros aren't very high on the Jaguar. 


That said, they really do have too many quality, upper-level minors/pre-arb players for 2025. Either at the trade deadline, or next offseason, they need to trade one of Happ or Seiya. Their NTCs can be overcome with the right incentives. If Happ likes a certain city, he might be on board if another year or two are added on to his current deal. Seiya might be willing if he was able to play more OF. Also, once Nico proves he's healthy, he should be packaged. I love his glove, but I don't think his bat will age well. He swings from his heels but still has one of the lower bat speeds in the league. Once he loses even a hint of his meager bat speed, his production will fall off a cliff. Once he proves he's healthy, they need to cash in that trade chip. 

I'm shocked Caissie hasn't gotten in reps at 1B at this point, even with his OF defense improving to "average." For his long-term career, having COF/1B on his resume will be important. The Cubs need to sort out a lot of players in the next 1-2 seasons, and a number of trades will have to happen in order to accomplish this.

Posted
3 hours ago, G.Krisch said:

I'm shocked Caissie hasn't gotten in reps at 1B at this point, even with his OF defense improving to "average." For his long-term career, having COF/1B on his resume will be important. The Cubs need to sort out a lot of players in the next 1-2 seasons, and a number of trades will have to happen in order to accomplish this.

Yeah I think Caissie's project for early this year at Iowa should be defensive versatility.  Get some real 1B reps in, get some DH reps in (there's a mental component to DH a lot of young guys struggle with). 

If he's playing 6 days a week at Iowa it should be something like 2 days in right, 1 in left, two 2 at first, and one at DH.  He needs to be set up to succeed if any of Happ, Tucker, Busch, or Suzuki go on the IL.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Giving Happ and Suzuki NTC could end up biting this team in the ass, only good thing is both Alcantara and Caissie are just 22 now.

I'm not exactly going to sweat 2 really good players signed below market value. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I'm not exactly going to sweat 2 really good players signed below market value. 

Theyre good players but not great, and having them cemented for the next 2 years now, could hold back the younger OF prospects and also keep them from adding a stud in the OF via FA or trade next offseason.

Only reason they were able to go after Tucker was because they traded Bellinger.

Also, them being below market value hasn't  really allowed Hoyer add a star player at other positions of substantial cost, it just helps keep them under the Threshold with the other low cost players they have.

Posted
9 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Theyre good players but not great, and having them cemented for the next 2 years now, could hold back the younger OF prospects and also keep them from adding a stud in the OF via FA or trade next offseason.

Only reason they were able to go after Tucker was because they traded Bellinger.

Also, them being below market value hasn't  really allowed Hoyer add a star player at other positions of substantial cost, it just helps keep them under the Threshold with the other low cost players they have.

Happ and Suzuki were 18th and 19th among qualified OF last year, You can't do better than that without paying a much higher price(see: Tucker), and Caissie/Alcantara are very much long shots to ever make it to that level, never mind in the next 2 seasons.

  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I'm not exactly going to sweat 2 really good players signed below market value. 

True. Also not too concerned about possibly not being able to trade them because maybe Cassie and Alcantara both should play everyday. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bertz said:

Yeah I think Caissie's project for early this year at Iowa should be defensive versatility.  Get some real 1B reps in, get some DH reps in (there's a mental component to DH a lot of young guys struggle with). 

If he's playing 6 days a week at Iowa it should be something like 2 days in right, 1 in left, two 2 at first, and one at DH.  He needs to be set up to succeed if any of Happ, Tucker, Busch, or Suzuki go on the IL.

I like your breakdown for his 2025. He can do all of that while still improving at the plate. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...