Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Update: Passan confirms trade done. Tucker to Cubs for Paredes, Cam Smith, Wesneski


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 317
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
4 minutes ago, KCCub said:

Framework of Bellinger for Bohm/Castellanos is a wash money wise. I know we're trying to spend Bellinger's $$$ elsewhere, but trading for a cost controlled SP is still on the table at some point. 

That is a very light framework as far as the Phillies are concerned. So you mean Bellinger and Suzuki for Bohm and Castellanos? Money aside is that fair. It does solve some issues. Phillies get outfielders, Cubs get a 3rd baseman and a guy who will DH. 

Posted
Just now, Rcal10 said:

That is a very light framework as far as the Phillies are concerned. So you mean Bellinger and Suzuki for Bohm and Castellanos? Money aside is that fair. It does solve some issues. Phillies get outfielders, Cubs get a 3rd baseman and a guy who will DH. 

Castellanos is a complete money dump. Owed 2 years $40m. They're attaching him to Bohm to get from out under that contract and want more flexbility at DH and better OFers. Suzuki would not be going back. I don't know what it would look like prospect wise, but Bellinger makes a lot of sense for what they need and unloading Castellanos makes a lot of sense for them. And then it opens up 3b for lets say Bregman for them.

Posted
2 minutes ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

I'm preparing to lose Smith but really hope Caissie is the main prospect.

If it's really Paredes+Caissie+Wesneski like that one tweet said, that's pretty much best case scenario

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KCCub said:

Castellanos is a complete money dump. Owed 2 years $40m. They're attaching him to Bohm to get from out under that contract and want more flexbility at DH and better OFers. Suzuki would not be going back. I don't know what it would look like prospect wise, but Bellinger makes a lot of sense for what they need and unloading Castellanos makes a lot of sense for them. And then it opens up 3b for lets say Bregman for them.

Well if we took Castellanos that would mean Suzuki gets traded. Maybe that trade nets them a pitcher. 

Posted

Since the Yankees moved a pitcher for Williams, I have to imagine that they are out on Tucker because without Gil the Astros dont seem interested, assuming their owner would approve the deal. I have to assume that means they are probably heavily in on Bregman. So what does a Bellinger for Oswaldo Cabrera deal look like? If the Yankees get Bregman, they still have LeMahieu locked through 26, Cabrera becomes the odd man out. Is Cabrera a better option than say Moncada at 3B? Cabrera is certainly more versatile in the event he just ends up on the bench.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

Well if we took Castellanos that would mean Suzuki gets traded. Maybe that trade nets them a pitcher. 

No. I mean no on Castellanos. 

Posted

The worst, most terrified GM in baseball on the verge of turning Chris Morel and the 73rd best prospect in baseball into a 180 wRC hitter over multiple trades in a 6 month period

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 1908_Cubs said:

Yeah, it wasn't. Guy had 11 followers.

Listen, I already told someone else to shut their filthy mouth I'm not afraid to say it again. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...