Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

An understated result of this offseason's moves is the SP depth being built up beyond this year. The 2019 team has:

 

Quintana

Darvish

Hendricks

Lester

Chatwood

Smyly

Montgomery

 

All under contract, plus Alzolay, Mills, Tseng, and an outside shot at at one of the college pitchers making the leap. Even considering the toll the '18 season will likely take, that's way better a starting point than this offseason. Combined with there being no current gaps or departures on the position player side, it really lines up for next offseason to be Harper and miscellany moves.

  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Just saw the title of an ESPN Insider article that says that the signing of Darvish has allowed the Cubs to "regain" control in the division. I'd love to know who they thought was in control yesterday
Posted
Just saw the title of an ESPN Insider article that says that the signing of Darvish has allowed the Cubs to "regain" control in the division. I'd love to know who they thought was in control yesterday

 

it's weird because it was keith law

Posted
Just saw the title of an ESPN Insider article that says that the signing of Darvish has allowed the Cubs to "regain" control in the division. I'd love to know who they thought was in control yesterday

 

it's weird because it was keith law

 

i'd have to read the article. keith law probably isn't writing the clickbait headlines.

Posted

all the guys acting like they're baseball geniuses for pointing out that the back ends of long FA deals for pitchers are rough is really cracking me up. Like no horsefeathers, that's the bargain you make. It would be sick if we could all be the Astros or whatever and have a WS caliber roster based on home grown dudes and short-commitment trades, but the rest of us who are trying to win the world series need good players now.

 

Lester is gonna be injured or bad at the end of his deal and I won't regret the signing in a second. Zobrist was awful last year and I couldn't stand watching him come to the plate but he's a horsefeathering Cubs legend for 2016.

 

The Cubs are gonna have to play around some dead weight in a few years, sure, but they're great now. Meanwhile the Brewers won't have any 36-year old SPs dragging down their payroll, but they're mediocre now and they'll be mediocre then. Good luck with that.

Posted
all the guys acting like they're baseball geniuses for pointing out that the back ends of long FA deals for pitchers are rough is really cracking me up. Like no horsefeathers, that's the bargain you make. It would be sick if we could all be the Astros or whatever and have a WS caliber roster based on home grown dudes and short-commitment trades, but the rest of us who are trying to win the world series need good players now.

 

Lester is gonna be injured or bad at the end of his deal and I won't regret the signing in a second. Zobrist was awful last year and I couldn't stand watching him come to the plate but he's a horsefeathering Cubs legend for 2016.

 

The Cubs are gonna have to play around some dead weight in a few years, sure, but they're great now. Meanwhile the Brewers won't have any 36-year old SPs dragging down their payroll, but they're mediocre now and they'll be mediocre then. Good luck with that.

tumblr_ne2xgj19sh1rnhnqfo1_500.gif

Posted
gvJm82N.png

 

Here's the Cub's payroll outlook for the next few years with Darvish. I assume Gimenez will make more than the league minimum if he's in the majors, but haven't seen any details, otherwise 2018 should be pretty much locked in.

 

To me the big takeaway is how well set up the team already is for 2019. Horsefeathers will happen for sure, but as of right now we'll be walking into an insanely loaded FA class with money to burn and no holes that need to be filled.

 

Honest question...according to that chart how/where is the money to burn at..?

 

Again, honest question because I REALLY don't know these things...and from the looks of that, aren't they over/under by 3.9 in the "red"...just trying to gain an honest understanding as I have Cardinal fans telling me that Harper would put us over the luxury cap by the 30 million (if that is what he commands)

 

ANY help would be appreciated. As maybe I am missing/reading things wrong...certainly wouldn't be the first time.

Posted
Just saw the title of an ESPN Insider article that says that the signing of Darvish has allowed the Cubs to "regain" control in the division. I'd love to know who they thought was in control yesterday

 

it's weird because it was keith law

 

From Keith Law's chat before Yu signed:

 

Jimmy: Cubs win Central fairly easily this year?

Keith Law: No, Jimmy from Chicago

 

:roll:

Posted
ANY help would be appreciated. As maybe I am missing/reading things wrong...certainly wouldn't be the first time.

 

The distinction is that they're trying to stay in the green this year so they can fly into the red next year with less worry. Depending on their tolerance for total payroll and the penalties for luxury tax they might have to make a tweak to fit in Harper's deal(like selling off the last year of Zobrist's deal by attaching a prospect), but already being in the red for 2019 is not a large concern.

Posted
Hope he stays

I think that's mostly Rogers being an ass. Monty definitely wants to start but I don't think he'll throw a tantrum over it. He'll get a few starts this season for sure.

 

A thing I've wondered in the past, would it be weird to go 6 man rotation most of the season? Or rotate Monty and Chatwood out of the 5th spot?

Posted
ANY help would be appreciated. As maybe I am missing/reading things wrong...certainly wouldn't be the first time.

 

The distinction is that they're trying to stay in the green this year so they can fly into the red next year with less worry. Depending on their tolerance for total payroll and the penalties for luxury tax they might have to make a tweak to fit in Harper's deal(like selling off the last year of Zobrist's deal by attaching a prospect), but already being in the red for 2019 is not a large concern.

 

The idea isn't so much to avoid paying the LT at all (though that would be ideal), but to keep the number of years crossing that threshold to a minimum (to minimize the repeat offender escalators), right?

 

And once the Cubs get out from under their current TV deal, that should take a lot of the edge off of paying the LT.

Posted

 

who would write such a thing wow

Article was well written. The headline was crap.

Doubt Law wrote the headline, ESPN has people for that

Yes they are called headline writers. I know he did not.

Posted

If you're the kind of person who really cares about getting efficiency out of your free agent dollars, I can see not liking this. Pitchers suck, six years for pitchers really sucks, and opt-outs are *really* bad.

 

But if you're the kind of person who likes it when you add really good pitchers to a really good baseball team, who cares about that nerd stuff.

Posted
If you're the kind of person who really cares about getting efficiency out of your free agent dollars, I can see not liking this. Pitchers suck, six years for pitchers really sucks, and opt-outs are *really* bad.

 

But if you're the kind of person who likes it when you add really good pitchers to a really good baseball team, who cares about that nerd stuff.

 

We are singing Harper in 9-10 months and a new massive tv deal. I want an evil empire, not an accountant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...