Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
volstad has some value, but you really don't want to be populating your starting rotation with a bunch of young guys who can't be anything more than league average (randy wells, travis wood, maybe volstad)

I still think Wood has a good chance to be above average. But, yeah, at some point you'll want potential TOR guys. If they can get Turner for Garza, they can potentially go into next offseason with a cheap mid-rotation guy (Wood), two cheap bottom of the rotation guys (Wells and Volstad), a potential #1/#2 (Turner), with a ton of money to spend on Cain, Hamels or Greinke.

  • Replies 698
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
PSD Insider guy says Z is worthless, we'll be paying entire contract and getting Volstad in return. He doesn't mention whether that's ALL we'll be getting back.

 

Does Volstad have some really great stuff or something? He's 26, hits arbitration in 2013, and has been less than stellar so far in his ML career. I don't have a problem targeting him, but I don't see enough potential there to pay all of Z's contract unless he's got some really nice stuff. I don't expect stars for Z (as great as the LoMo talk is, it's almost certainly a pipedream), but if Volstad is it and we're paying the entire deal, I'd have rather kept Z and hoped a good first half would boost his value some.

 

That said, after the Marshall/Wood trade, I'm not criticizing this trade until we find out all the details. And Volstad is 6'8, which is kind of cool ......

 

He once was a worthwhile prospect from 2006-2008, when BA had him as their #97, #40, and #58 prospect in baseball each of those three years, respectively. He's just never panned out the way everyone hoped.

 

FanGraphs liked him as a bounceback candidate.

Posted
PSD Insider guy says Z is worthless, we'll be paying entire contract and getting Volstad in return. He doesn't mention whether that's ALL we'll be getting back.

 

Does Volstad have some really great stuff or something? He's 26, hits arbitration in 2013, and has been less than stellar so far in his ML career. I don't have a problem targeting him, but I don't see enough potential there to pay all of Z's contract unless he's got some really nice stuff. I don't expect stars for Z (as great as the LoMo talk is, it's almost certainly a pipedream), but if Volstad is it and we're paying the entire deal, I'd have rather kept Z and hoped a good first half would boost his value some.

 

That said, after the Marshall/Wood trade, I'm not criticizing this trade until we find out all the details. And Volstad is 6'8, which is kind of cool ......

 

Volstad has a pretty good sinker, iirc, and a decent curve. He's a ground ball pitcher also, iirc.

Posted
yeah i didn't realize volstad has over 3 years of service time. he's a back of the rotation guy, meaning that once he hits arbitration he's a candidate to be non-tendered unless he suddenly gets better. not seeing much value in dumping zambrano for volstad unless it results in saving a bunch of cash that is invested elsewhere.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
volstad kind of blows

Career high strikeout rate last year along with a career low walk rate. The improvement was masked by what looks like some moderately bad luck.

 

There's a hint of potential there, but the best case scenario looks like a typical Ryan Dempster year. Given he's not even under club control for long, I think I'd have rather held on to Zambrano and prayed for a resurgence (culminating in a deadline deal).

Posted
Without looking at his numbers to confirm, MLBTR has Volstad scheduled to make 2.6 mill in arb for 2012. I'm not sure I've ever watched him pitch. If so, he wasn't memorable. He was a 1st round pick and he's very tall. Without cheating, that's all I know about him.
Posted
Volstad has a pretty good sinker, iirc, and a decent curve. He's a ground ball pitcher also, iirc.

 

He once was a worthwhile prospect from 2006-2008, when BA had him as their #97, #40, and #58 prospect in baseball each of those three years, respectively. He's just never panned out the way everyone hoped.

 

FanGraphs liked him as a bounceback candidate.

 

Thanks. Both of those give me some hope that Theo/Hoyer saw something in him and feel that he's a candidate to potentially break out a bit. If the deal is Z for Volstad straight up and we're paying all of Z's contract, I'd still rather have waited for the deadline, though.

Posted
Without looking at his numbers to confirm, MLBTR has Volstad scheduled to make 2.6 mill in arb for 2012. I'm not sure I've ever watched him pitch. If so, he wasn't memorable. He was a 1st round pick and he's very tall. Without cheating, that's all I know about him.

 

I remember seeing him in 2008 when he first came up and thinking he had good, live stuff. I remember a power sinker, though I could be wrong. Obviously the numbers are not what you'd like to see.

Posted
volstad kind of blows

Career high strikeout rate last year along with a career low walk rate. The improvement was masked by what looks like some moderately bad luck.

 

There's a hint of potential there, but the best case scenario looks like a typical Ryan Dempster year. Given he's not even under club control for long, I think I'd have rather held on to Zambrano and prayed for a resurgence (culminating in a deadline deal).

 

He has serious issues with HRs. Even if you throw out his ERA and W/L, you're still looking at a pitcher whose best case scenario at this point seems to be either as a 4/5 or as a good, but not great, setup man.

 

Maybe he just needs a few tweaks to help his mechanics/delivery. But, I'm not exactly thrilled with the Cubs picking him up if he's all they would get for Zambrano.

Guest
Guests
Posted
volstad kind of blows

Career high strikeout rate last year along with a career low walk rate. The improvement was masked by what looks like some moderately bad luck.

 

There's a hint of potential there, but the best case scenario looks like a typical Ryan Dempster year. Given he's not even under club control for long, I think I'd have rather held on to Zambrano and prayed for a resurgence (culminating in a deadline deal).

 

He has serious issues with HRs. Even if you throw out his ERA and W/L, you're still looking at a pitcher whose best case scenario at this point seems to be either as a 4/5 or as a good, but not great, setup man.

 

Maybe he just needs a few tweaks to help his mechanics/delivery. But, I'm not exactly thrilled with the Cubs picking him up if he's all they would get for Zambrano.

 

This strikes me as sort of a weird thing to say. Because you should always throw those out. Actually, you should never even have them.

Posted
Someone from the Palm Beach paper mentions Dominguez as a possibility. I'm not very high on him, but he IS a potential excellent fielder with average power for the position. Nobody else has reported him as being potentially in the deal as well, but if he IS, it's solid work from our side, in my opinion. He'd be a trade chip at least. This being said, our 40 man is at 40, so unless another move is made or we include something else in the deal, I figure it's a straight one for one deal.
Posted
I'd be fine with Volstad in return if we are relieved of all but 5 mill of Z's salary. I dont think his perceived value will net us very much else. If it's Volstad and Dominguez then we win by a lot, IMO.
Posted
I'd be fine with Volstad in return if we are relieved of all but 5 mill of Z's salary. I dont think his perceived value will net us very much else. If it's Volstad and Dominguez then we win by a lot, IMO.

 

Why do you care about salary relief? We don't have anybody to spend that 5M on.

Posted
dominguez is just a lousy hitter. he's supposed to be outstanding at third so the bar for him is pretty low offensively, but if he hits like gary scott then it doesn't matter how great his glove is.
Posted
I'd be fine with Volstad in return if we are relieved of all but 5 mill of Z's salary. I dont think his perceived value will net us very much else. If it's Volstad and Dominguez then we win by a lot, IMO.

 

Yay, more money saved to spend on nothing.

Posted
Someone from the Palm Beach paper mentions Dominguez as a possibility. I'm not very high on him, but he IS a potential excellent fielder with average power for the position. Nobody else has reported him as being potentially in the deal as well, but if he IS, it's solid work from our side, in my opinion. He'd be a trade chip at least. This being said, our 40 man is at 40, so unless another move is made or we include something else in the deal, I figure it's a straight one for one deal.

 

Volstad and Dominguez for Z would be kind of intriguing. I'd like some offense from a third base prospect, but if the awful offense we've been seeing at third continues, Dominguez could project moderately well and could be used as trade bait in the future.

Posted
I'd be fine with Volstad in return if we are relieved of all but 5 mill of Z's salary. I dont think his perceived value will net us very much else. If it's Volstad and Dominguez then we win by a lot, IMO.

 

Why do you care about salary relief? We don't have anybody to spend that 5M on.

 

Banking cash is fine with me if it's used to sign draft picks, international FA's, make trades to add veterans, or to ink future FA's. I'm not thinking it's going to be used immediately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...