Pie traded to Baltimore for Olson and minor leaguer

[imb]

welp, i never saw that one i guess

 

you're on your own now, dexter

[BigbadB]

welp, i never saw that one i guess

 

you're on your own now, dexter

 

My other plan was to hurry up and delete my not so private message once he read it, but he sorta disappeared.

[CUBZ99]

welp, i never saw that one i guess

 

you're on your own now, dexter

 

My other plan was to hurry up and delete my not so private message once he read it, but he sorta disappeared.

 

Your such a prick.

 

J/k btw. :-))

[SouthSideRyan]

I will agree with most that Pie was never really given a real shot of winning an everyday job. However, he also never showed that he could hit a major league breaking ball.

 

he was never given the chance to adjust

 

Read your PM's.

 

My PMs haven't worked for a while

 

I guess I'll just have to share what I have to say to you with everyone.

 

This is a discussion board, not an argument board. If you can't find a better way of DISCUSSING baseball, you will not be long for this place. Everything has to be a huge argument with you, and it really needs to stop.

 

You've been warned enough times already to tone it down. I'm not sure how many more times you will get.

 

Haha, what??

[Exile on Waveland]

I will agree with most that Pie was never really given a real shot of winning an everyday job. However, he also never showed that he could hit a major league breaking ball.

 

he was never given the chance to adjust

 

Read your PM's.

 

My PMs haven't worked for a while

 

I guess I'll just have to share what I have to say to you with everyone.

 

This is a discussion board, not an argument board. If you can't find a better way of DISCUSSING baseball, you will not be long for this place. Everything has to be a huge argument with you, and it really needs to stop.

 

You've been warned enough times already to tone it down. I'm not sure how many more times you will get.

 

Haha, what??

 

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

 

That's what she said.

[cubbinalltheway]

I will agree with most that Pie was never really given a real shot of winning an everyday job. However, he also never showed that he could hit a major league breaking ball.

 

he was never given the chance to adjust

 

Read your PM's.

 

My PMs haven't worked for a while

 

I guess I'll just have to share what I have to say to you with everyone.

 

This is a discussion board, not an argument board. If you can't find a better way of DISCUSSING baseball, you will not be long for this place. Everything has to be a huge argument with you, and it really needs to stop.

 

You've been warned enough times already to tone it down. I'm not sure how many more times you will get.

 

Haha, what??

 

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

glad i'm not the only who who notices this

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

glad i'm not the only who who notices this

 

But would Olson or Pie feel the same way?

[Exile on Waveland]

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

 

That's what she said.

 

He he. And, for what it's worth, despite our political arguments, I was not referring to you.

[17 Seconds]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

[17 Seconds]

I will agree with most that Pie was never really given a real shot of winning an everyday job. However, he also never showed that he could hit a major league breaking ball.

 

he was never given the chance to adjust

 

Read your PM's.

 

My PMs haven't worked for a while

 

I guess I'll just have to share what I have to say to you with everyone.

 

This is a discussion board, not an argument board. If you can't find a better way of DISCUSSING baseball, you will not be long for this place. Everything has to be a huge argument with you, and it really needs to stop.

 

You've been warned enough times already to tone it down. I'm not sure how many more times you will get.

 

Haha, what??

 

Some on the board are unnecessarily belligerent.

glad i'm not the only who who notices this

 

the problem is that you are using it as a copout in this thread. i never did anything wrong in this thread until yu started throwing out the "you're just arguing for the sake or arguing" line and then some other joker comes in and starts insulting me for no reason. i disagreed with your point about vitters having "no chance to be great", and instead of defending what you said, you just turn it into me "aruging for the sake of arguing" because you konw that iwll fly due to me arguing in other threads. weak, but whatever.

[cubbinalltheway]

the problem is that you are using it as a copout in this thread. i never did anything wrong in this thread until yu started throwing out the "you're just arguing for the sake or arguing" line and then some other joker comes in and starts insulting me for no reason. i disagreed with your point about vitters having "no chance to be great", and instead of defending what you said, you just turn it into me "aruging for the sake of arguing" because you konw that iwll fly due to me arguing in other threads. weak, but whatever.

ooooookay!

[17 Seconds]

exactly my point. just criticize me for other threads instead of sticking to what we were discussing.

[17 Seconds]

how can you get on a guy for arguing a point he believes in? whether his point is right or wrong, he hasn't broken any rules.

 

I can count at least 2 broken rules in the following post, but thanks for caring. I always know I can count on you, IMB.

 

Did you even read the thread or are you just trying to be a dick?

 

So I question why somebody says they're giving Vitters no chance at being great, and suddenly I'm just arguing for the sake of arguing and I'm being an ass or something. Okay, whatever. It's just a copout because he realized he said something that didn't make sense, so he tries to make it into me being a douchebag or something instead of talking about that.

 

I'd say the people who have me on ignore are probably people who have said dumbass things. Sorry if you're one of those people.

 

 

yeah and you conveniently leave out that this was a response to a guy who came in the thread out of nowhere and started insulting me for no reason.

[Transmogrified Tiger]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

[17 Seconds]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout.

[cubbinalltheway]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout

what the hell are you talking about? i replied to someone else effectively saying "i agree". shouldn't your issue be with the other person? so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

[17 Seconds]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout

what the hell are you talking about? i replied to someone else effectively saying "i agree". shouldn't your issue be with the other person? so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

 

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

[cubbinalltheway]

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

lol and you keep going. good grief pal, get a clue.

[KingCubsFan]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout

what the hell are you talking about? i replied to someone else effectively saying "i agree". shouldn't your issue be with the other person? so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

 

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p228/irish1289/AwJeezNotThisSheetAgain-763108.jpg

[17 Seconds]

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

lol and you keep going. good grief pal, get a clue.

 

Oh look, more insults with no substance because you can't refute what I'm saying

 

Look, I could do a post by post from Peavy thread that shows what I'm talking about. You said that we shouldn't give Vitters a chance due to his 2008 season. Then I asked why and we started discussing, or "arguring it". I never was hostile or did anything wrong, then you suddenly accuse me of "arguing for the sakle of arguing" even though I wasn't being a douche or anything. If it was another screenname saying those things to you, you wouldn't have said anything. You saw my name and remembered that I was one of the guys who criticized you for claiming that "there's no way Prior could have staye injured for 5 years if he actually tried to get healthy" and basiccaly that the reason he's hurt is because he's lazy, so then you decided it would be asier to just say "oh, ell you're the d-bag who said that stuff in the priopr thread so I'm gonna pretend like you're being mean right now"

 

Now all your posts are just "Lol, whatever" and "you're stupid", and "good grief pal" because you have nothing to say.

[17 Seconds]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout

what the hell are you talking about? i replied to someone else effectively saying "i agree". shouldn't your issue be with the other person? so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

 

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

 

http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p228/irish1289/AwJeezNotThisSheetAgain-763108.jpg

 

Oh look, more of the same

 

Really at this point if someone said 2+2=5 and I said it was 4, it would be full of posts from you guys saying the same stuff just because you don't like me

[Transmogrified Tiger]

so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

 

 

lol and you keep going. good grief pal, get a clue.

 

Why would you think either of these things is acceptable? Please don't attack other posters.

[KingCubsFan]

I disagree with bigbadb all the time and when i used a naughty word he saw it as an opportunity to scold me. i didn't know that this message board was rated g. oh well. i just think how it's funny that the post that was the last straw for him was "pie was never given a chance to adjust". I guess I realy crossed the line on that one. Too far man, too far

 

This thread was chosen because he saw you post in it and it's where you said your PMs didn't work. More than one mod noticed that there was an excess of pointless arguing(accomplishing nothing, cluttering up several threads, and toeing the line of personal attacks from both parties) that spans several pages in multiple threads, and you were a common denominator in most of them. Though it applies to anyone, if you find yourself 8-10 posts deep in an argument/discussion, it's a good idea to step back and see if you're actually still discussing the topic at hand and not just bickering tangent after tangent that doesn't do any good.

 

No I agree, he should have just pointed it out in a thread that it was actually relevant.

 

I also don'tl ike thatcubbieallthewayguy condemning me for other threads when I never did anything wrong in the thread he trashed me for it. He used it as a copout

what the hell are you talking about? i replied to someone else effectively saying "i agree". shouldn't your issue be with the other person? so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you.

 

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You throw out lines like "so stupid. maybe the internet isn't for you", and i'm the one who is wrong. okay

 

I disagreed with you when you said we should give Vitters no chance to be good, and instead of backing up your arugment, you instead claim I'm "aruging for the sake or arguing" because of other threads. Then some other guy comes in to insult me, again for other threads, and you join in with him.... when really I did nothing in that thread

 

Stop using past threads to try and comdemn me or something just because I didn't agree with your post

 

http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p228/irish1289/AwJeezNotThisSheetAgain-763108.jpg

 

Oh look, more of the same

 

Really at this point if someone said 2+2=5 and I said it was 4, it would be full of posts from you guys saying the same stuff just because you don't like me

I was referring to both of you

[The Other 15]

I'm just stunned how poor dex is so misunderstood. Don't worry dude, like Galleleo, you'll be proven right that 2+2=4. It has to be bothersome that in every thread, with any discussion, you find people believing it's 5. Oh, the struggles of a visionary.