Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Even before the Z injury situation per Dave Kaplan's "sources" on the Cubs pregame just now.

 

 

Discuss.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Personally, I would love the acquisition, but I'm also a bit of a gambler. I love the potential of a Z ( ) and Harden top of the rotation, especially for the playoffs, and for the next few years.

 

I know everyone is leery of his injury history, though.

Posted
I'd love having him. The big qustions are if he can stay healthy and how much Beane will demand. He's screwed us over before (see: Kendall, Jason).

 

Beane can't really demand as much as you'd think given that a stiff breeze can put Harden on the DL.

Posted
I'd love having him. The big qustions are if he can stay healthy and how much Beane will demand. He's screwed us over before (see: Kendall, Jason).

 

 

I would hardly define getting Jerry Blevins and Rob Bowen for Kendall as screwing us.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'd love having him. The big qustions are if he can stay healthy and how much Beane will demand. He's screwed us over before (see: Kendall, Jason).

 

 

I would hardly define getting Jerry Blevins and Rob Bowen for Kendall as screwing us.

 

I think the screwing us part comes when we get Jason Kendall.

Community Moderator
Posted
Hill + Pie + Ceda for Harden sounds about right.

 

Giving up on Hill would be harder for me than giving up on Pie, but ya gotta do it this year.

Posted
Hill + Pie + Ceda for Harden sounds about right.

 

As good as Harden is, he's still only thrown 200 IP the last 3 seasons combined. I'd say either dropping Ceda or swapping Pie for Colvin would be pretty good value for him.

Posted
I agree with the last couple posts here -- Harden's injury history may help us as much (or more) than hurt us. It's a bargaining chip in Hendry's favor. Granted, if we land him, it becomes our accepted risk. But make no mistake, if Harden were pitching full seasons the last couple years, Beane could demand a king's ransom. but he can't.
Posted
I'd love having him. The big qustions are if he can stay healthy and how much Beane will demand. He's screwed us over before (see: Kendall, Jason).

 

 

I would hardly define getting Jerry Blevins and Rob Bowen for Kendall as screwing us.

 

I think the screwing us part comes when we get Jason Kendall.

 

I think Kendall was exactly what the Cubs expected last year. A .350 OBP catcher with no power and defensive problems.

 

The part where the Cubs erred was taking that over Soto, not having anything to do with Beane.

 

As I said a couple of weeks ago, in 3 deals with the club, the Cubs were the only one to get a pretty good player (Barrett).

 

So far when the two of them have hooked up the Cubs have gotten Barrett, Bynum, and Kendall. The A's have gotten Damian Miller, Koronka (sent to the Rangers instead), Bowen, and Blevins. Blevins is the only one with future potential in that list, and he's a 24 year old reliever not having a great year in AAA. I'd say the Cubs have gotten the slightly better end of the deals so far.

 

The Cubs also got a compensatory pick for Kendall. I'm not sure if the A's did for Miller or not.

Posted
I agree with the last couple posts here -- Harden's injury history may help us as much (or more) than hurt us. It's a bargaining chip in Hendry's favor. Granted, if we land him, it becomes our accepted risk. But make no mistake, if Harden were pitching full seasons the last couple years, Beane could demand a king's ransom. but he can't.

I don't know about that. He's not FA eligible and isn't raking in the dough yet. Some team will be dumb enough to drive the value on him up. I don't want him because I'm tired of hanging hopes of success on injury prone pitchers. I don't want to go into 2009 thinking we've got another ace caliber pitcher only to be strung along the whole season while waiting for him to come off of the DL. We've had enough of that this decade.

Posted

I think we're one a few teams that can take a chance on Harden. We have pitching depth, we just lack the top of rotation talent. We'd probably send one of Gallagher, Marshall, or Hill in a deal for a pitcher and we might unload Marquis if we got one. We also might send Gallagher back down if we kept Marquis. Either way, if we dealt for a pitcher like Harden (assume a Hill, Pie, Ceda deal), we'd still have Zambrano, Lilly, Dempster, Gallagher, Marquis, and Marshall for depth.

 

Teams with less depth might be forced to overlook Harden because of that fact.

 

I think Hill+Pie+Ceda gets it done. I'd probably start with a lower offer...something along the lines of subbing Colvin for Pie and trying to take Ceda out of it, but in the long run if you can get Harden for Hill+Pie+Ceda, I do it.

 

If Zambrano is out for the year or for an uncertain amount of time, the Cubs might need to focus on Sabathia because our depth would not be as strong and might not be able to risk Harden.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Here's the thing... Harden has a 7 million dollar option next season with no buyout. That's gonna make him cost some more in terms of talent.

 

I'd do Hill and Pie, plus a lower-ceiling guy like EPatt.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'd love to have a healthy Harden, but there's no real indication that will consistently happen. I'm not as wild about this idea as most of you seem to be.
Posted

In general, I don't really pay too close attention to the AL. As such, I don't know a lot about Rich Harden. Looking through his stats, I see that he's very good when he pitches. But that doesn't appear to happen too often.

 

What is his injury history? Is it a recurring problem, or multiple ones?

Posted
I think that the Cubs best chance is going to be either Harden or Burnett. I don't see them having the goods to compete for C.C. while Harden and Burnett, due to their injury histories, might come cheaper. I like Harden.
Posted
I would go crazy if we somehow managed to get Harden.

 

If for nothing else, to watch the '"Harden-Wood" combo dominate NL hitters.

Posted
I think that the Cubs best chance is going to be either Harden or Burnett. I don't see them having the goods to compete for C.C. while Harden and Burnett, due to their injury histories, might come cheaper. I like Harden.

 

I agree although that was said about the Mets with Santana. I guess never underestimate the amount a team values getting a star out of their league.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...