The Official 2007 NBA Draft Thread

[Derwood]

For some reason I think the Bulls end up with Yi. Not really sure why I think this.

 

only if the Bulls can trade up to #3 or #4, as there is virtually no way Boston passes on him at 5

 

Hey! We were both wrong! High five!

 

well I think Boston would have taken Yi had this Ray Allen deal not presented itself

[The Voice of Reason]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

[Guest]

I hate the team but Arron will thrive in Detroit. I'm really happy for him. It was nice to see Gabe Pruitt there right next to Arron...good to see Arron go ahead of Pruitt. :D

 

Back-to-back years with first round picks, it's been a while. And the trend should continue next season with Collison next year.

Edited June 29, 2007 by CaliforniaRaisin

[Derwood]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

[Jon]

A graphical kick to the balls:

 

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/media/thumbnails/story/2007-06/30839232.jpg

[RynoRules]

Pax has no stones. Noah was a safe pick and will be a nice, hard working player. But we needed a 20-10 guy, not a Thomas-Wallace combo. Could have had Randolph and chickened out.

[Guest]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

[killthegoat06]

Color me surprised that we took Noah. (sarcasm)

[Derwood]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

Where are the reports that Paxson chickened out on Randolph? And who was available at the #9 pick that is "guaranteed" to fill our need better than Noah?

[Guest]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

[Transmogrified Tiger]

Someone is going to get a steal with Byars.

[RynoRules]

Let me clarify - I have not read anywhere that Pax was in on the Randolph deal at any time. I do think we could have put together an attratcive pckg for him, but I'd bet that Pax doesn't have the guts to do so.

 

Again, Noah's a nice player. But how much better are the Bulls right now than they were 3 hrs ago? Not much.

[Derwood]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

[Transmogrified Tiger]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

[Derwood]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

 

right, because Noah was as important to Florida as Armstrong was to the Bulls. brilliant analogy

[Handlebar McSkullet]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

 

right, because Noah was as important to Florida as Armstrong was to the Bulls. brilliant analogy

 

listen, im not jazzed that the bulls drafted noah either. but what do you expect at 9, and im not going to speculate on what trade might have been available. also that bj armstrong logic is so ridiculous I thought it was a joke at first.

[Keener98]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

 

right, because Noah was as important to Florida as Armstrong was to the Bulls. brilliant analogy

 

THe difference is Jordan already played in the NBA so we all know he doesnt suck where as Noah hasnt played in the NBA, so one can say he sucks. His NBA skills can be questioned as such to say he sucks.

[Keener98]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

 

right, because Noah was as important to Florida as Armstrong was to the Bulls. brilliant analogy

 

listen, im not jazzed that the bulls drafted noah either. but what do you expect at 9, and im not going to speculate on what trade might have been available. also that bj armstrong logic is so ridiculous I thought it was a joke at first.

 

The logic saying Noah cant suck because he won 2 titles is a joke also.

[ChiCubsFan]

Wow...Richardson for Brandan Wright...hmmm

[Transmogrified Tiger]

wow, Landry is an awful pick

 

Stephen A. Smith is so funny being that emphatic since he's wrong.

[Handlebar McSkullet]

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

no better than:

 

B.J. Armstrong is a legend, look at his rings.

 

right, because Noah was as important to Florida as Armstrong was to the Bulls. brilliant analogy

 

listen, im not jazzed that the bulls drafted noah either. but what do you expect at 9, and im not going to speculate on what trade might have been available. also that bj armstrong logic is so ridiculous I thought it was a joke at first.

 

The logic saying Noah cant suck because he won 2 titles is a joke also.

 

agreed

[killthegoat06]

BULLS TRADE CHRIS DUHON FOR GREG ODEN

 

CUBS TRADE JOCK JONES FOR JOAKIM NOAH

[Guest]

I didn't think I could be more disappointed than I was with Tyrus Thomas over Aldridge. But here we are.

 

Noah sucks.

 

Who would you have selected at #9 if you were Pax?

 

"Noah Sucks" is about the most useless (and inaccurate) critique you can make. Maybe you don't like him, but clearly a two-time National Champ doesn't suck

 

That's poor logic, just because he got 2 banners doesn't validate a pick...otherwise Green and Humphrey would be lotto picks. (Keep in mind I like the pick...and I HATE Noah.)

 

it's better than "Noah sucks" with no further explanation

 

No, it's not.

 

okay, this is ridiculous.

 

Here: Michael Jordan sucked

 

great argument, right?

 

Ryan gave an opinion but didn't defend it - so you can't judge how good an argument it was without considering where Ryan is coming from. You gave an opinion but backed it up with very poor logic.

[killthegoat06]

Is the 2nd round today also?

[XZero771679666304]

I just got to the party, and am not the least bit thrilled with Noah. Would rather have had Julian Wright. Maybe even Acie Law.

 

Joakim was a good player, but I have a bad feeling he'll be exposed in the NBA.