Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Congrats bears fans on the win, the North and the season. They’ve played well. It’s not common for three teams in the division to have down seasons. But the bears have played up to the challenge.

 

I expect the Packers and vikes to be better next year. But that will make the rivalries even better.

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Congrats bears fans on the win, the North and the season. They’ve played well. It’s not common for three teams in the division to have down seasons. But the bears have played up to the challenge.

 

I expect the Packers and vikes to be better next year. But that will make the rivalries even better.

...why would you think the Packers would be better?

Posted
Congrats bears fans on the win, the North and the season. They’ve played well. It’s not common for three teams in the division to have down seasons. But the bears have played up to the challenge.

 

I expect the Packers and vikes to be better next year. But that will make the rivalries even better.

...why would you think the Packers would be better?

 

Lots of reasons, but I’m not gonna derail a Bears thread in a Chicago teams forum. In a nut shell: #12, probable better health.

Posted
Packers fans can't even say congratulations without coming off as condescending asshats.

 

 

I work with a bunch of Packer fans and it was like " It took them nearly 10 years to beat the Packers in a meaningful game" I think they all know deep down the glass is half empty not full for them, that or they are in denial.

Posted
Congrats bears fans on the win, the North and the season. They’ve played well. It’s not common for three teams in the division to have down seasons. But the bears have played up to the challenge.

 

I expect the Packers and vikes to be better next year. But that will make the rivalries even better.

...why would you think the Packers would be better?

 

Lots of reasons, but I’m not gonna derail a Bears thread in a Chicago teams forum. In a nut shell: #12, probable better health.

 

#12 will be a year older too, and with a bigger chunk of your cap hit under his belt. The Vikings will likely be a bigger challenger.

Posted

...why would you think the Packers would be better?

 

Lots of reasons, but I’m not gonna derail a Bears thread in a Chicago teams forum. In a nut shell: #12, probable better health.

 

#12 will be a year older too, and with a bigger chunk of your cap hit under his belt. The Vikings will likely be a bigger challenger.

but everyone will be older

Posted

 

Lots of reasons, but I’m not gonna derail a Bears thread in a Chicago teams forum. In a nut shell: #12, probable better health.

 

#12 will be a year older too, and with a bigger chunk of your cap hit under his belt. The Vikings will likely be a bigger challenger.

but everyone will be older

 

 

Not THAT old. Hell be 36

Posted
I'm a Packer fan. Rodgers wouldn't be the team's problem if he were turning 40, even if he does have this no-INT, 6 sacks a game fetish thing going on. The Packers are just run by dipshits. They spent Rodgers' best years refusing to bring in any talent in FA, and then when they DO decide to dip into the coffers, they blow it all on the corpse of Jimmy Graham, who was clearly toast two years ago, and a bunch of old fart defensive players, most of whom, not stunningly, got hurt. They don't have much to speak of in terms of awesome young talent. The Packers will be good for 6-8 wins so long as Rodgers is playing, but the rest of the Packers blow big time. (I can't tell if Devante is actually good or not. MAYBE he's ok, too.)
Posted
I'm a Packer fan. Rodgers wouldn't be the team's problem if he were turning 40, even if he does have this no-INT, 6 sacks a game fetish thing going on. The Packers are just run by dipshits. They spent Rodgers' best years refusing to bring in any talent in FA, and then when they DO decide to dip into the coffers, they blow it all on the corpse of Jimmy Graham, who was clearly toast two years ago, and a bunch of old fart defensive players, most of whom, not stunningly, got hurt. They don't have much to speak of in terms of awesome young talent. The Packers will be good for 6-8 wins so long as Rodgers is playing, but the rest of the Packers blow big time. (I can't tell if Devante is actually good or not. MAYBE he's ok, too.)

 

 

but that was the hallmark of the Packers for yeeeeaarrrs..."we DRAFT talent". Every team eventually runs out of talent when they have a few at the top sucking up the financial resources and winning enough to put them consistently out of the top 10 draft wise. Even, the Patriots(!) will meet that fate eventually.

Community Moderator
Posted
With great..., success, comes great..., opponents. Bears look to travel to philly and Rams next year. Face KC, LAC and NO at home.

 

Uh, you do know that all but 2 games are predetermined, right? Each division rotates which division in their own and the opposite conference that they play in entirety every year (8 games). 6 division games. And the other 2 games they play the team that finishes in the same place in the other 2 divisions in the same conference as the team does in their own.

Posted
With great..., success, comes great..., opponents. Bears look to travel to philly and Rams next year. Face KC, LAC and NO at home.

 

Uh, you do know that all but 2 games are predetermined, right? Each division rotates which division in their own and the opposite conference that they play in entirety every year (8 games). 6 division games. And the other 2 games they play the team that finishes in the same place in the other 2 divisions in the same conference as the team does in their own.

Pretty sure he knows.

Community Moderator
Posted
With great..., success, comes great..., opponents. Bears look to travel to philly and Rams next year. Face KC, LAC and NO at home.

 

Uh, you do know that all but 2 games are predetermined, right? Each division rotates which division in their own and the opposite conference that they play in entirety every year (8 games). 6 division games. And the other 2 games they play the team that finishes in the same place in the other 2 divisions in the same conference as the team does in their own.

Pretty sure he knows.

I figured he did. Just making sure.

Posted
With great..., success, comes great..., opponents. Bears look to travel to philly and Rams next year. Face KC, LAC and NO at home.

 

Uh, you do know that all but 2 games are predetermined, right? Each division rotates which division in their own and the opposite conference that they play in entirety every year (8 games). 6 division games. And the other 2 games they play the team that finishes in the same place in the other 2 divisions in the same conference as the team does in their own.

yes, and those teams are the NFC west and south winners, the two best teams of 2018 outside of KC, and they already play KC.

 

NO at home is good though. One of the few true HFA teams.

Posted
I'm a Packer fan. Rodgers wouldn't be the team's problem if he were turning 40, even if he does have this no-INT, 6 sacks a game fetish thing going on. The Packers are just run by dipshits. They spent Rodgers' best years refusing to bring in any talent in FA, and then when they DO decide to dip into the coffers, they blow it all on the corpse of Jimmy Graham, who was clearly toast two years ago, and a bunch of old fart defensive players, most of whom, not stunningly, got hurt. They don't have much to speak of in terms of awesome young talent. The Packers will be good for 6-8 wins so long as Rodgers is playing, but the rest of the Packers blow big time. (I can't tell if Devante is actually good or not. MAYBE he's ok, too.)

 

 

but that was the hallmark of the Packers for yeeeeaarrrs..."we DRAFT talent". Every team eventually runs out of talent when they have a few at the top sucking up the financial resources and winning enough to put them consistently out of the top 10 draft wise. Even, the Patriots(!) will meet that fate eventually.

 

Not at all...From CheeseheadTV-

"For me the game changing play was the recovered FF. That put the Packers in the game and allowed them to score their only TD. The game killing drive was when the refs handed Chi a TD with 2 poor calls. After seeing the game handed to Chi on a silver platter it left 2018 once more with a terrible taste.

 

I know as a fan I'm biased towards the Packers but even talking to fans of other teams they commented on how GB got hosed this year."

Posted
I'm a Packer fan. Rodgers wouldn't be the team's problem if he were turning 40, even if he does have this no-INT, 6 sacks a game fetish thing going on. The Packers are just run by dipshits. They spent Rodgers' best years refusing to bring in any talent in FA, and then when they DO decide to dip into the coffers, they blow it all on the corpse of Jimmy Graham, who was clearly toast two years ago, and a bunch of old fart defensive players, most of whom, not stunningly, got hurt. They don't have much to speak of in terms of awesome young talent. The Packers will be good for 6-8 wins so long as Rodgers is playing, but the rest of the Packers blow big time. (I can't tell if Devante is actually good or not. MAYBE he's ok, too.)

 

 

but that was the hallmark of the Packers for yeeeeaarrrs..."we DRAFT talent". Every team eventually runs out of talent when they have a few at the top sucking up the financial resources and winning enough to put them consistently out of the top 10 draft wise. Even, the Patriots(!) will meet that fate eventually.

 

Not at all...From CheeseheadTV-

"For me the game changing play was the recovered FF. That put the Packers in the game and allowed them to score their only TD. The game killing drive was when the refs handed Chi a TD with 2 poor calls. After seeing the game handed to Chi on a silver platter it left 2018 once more with a terrible taste.

 

I know as a fan I'm biased towards the Packers but even talking to fans of other teams they commented on how GB got hosed this year."

 

what?

Posted

 

 

but that was the hallmark of the Packers for yeeeeaarrrs..."we DRAFT talent". Every team eventually runs out of talent when they have a few at the top sucking up the financial resources and winning enough to put them consistently out of the top 10 draft wise. Even, the Patriots(!) will meet that fate eventually.

 

Not at all...From CheeseheadTV-

"For me the game changing play was the recovered FF. That put the Packers in the game and allowed them to score their only TD. The game killing drive was when the refs handed Chi a TD with 2 poor calls. After seeing the game handed to Chi on a silver platter it left 2018 once more with a terrible taste.

 

I know as a fan I'm biased towards the Packers but even talking to fans of other teams they commented on how GB got hosed this year."

 

what?

 

Packers never get beat by a better team, every loss was the result of bad officiating.

Posted

 

Not at all...From CheeseheadTV-

"For me the game changing play was the recovered FF. That put the Packers in the game and allowed them to score their only TD. The game killing drive was when the refs handed Chi a TD with 2 poor calls. After seeing the game handed to Chi on a silver platter it left 2018 once more with a terrible taste.

 

I know as a fan I'm biased towards the Packers but even talking to fans of other teams they commented on how GB got hosed this year."

 

what?

 

Packers never get beat by a better team, every loss was the result of bad officiating.

 

gotcha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...