Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Anyone notice any similarities between recent Jake and 2015 playoffs Jake?

 

The Pirates did not.

I'm referring to how Jake looked in both Cardinals and Mets series

 

http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/oh_i_get_it_fight_club.gif

  • Replies 566
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...
Community Moderator
Posted

So Jesse Rogers wrote a recap of last night claiming that Arrieta is back in the Cy Young race.

 

Then I checked the ESPN Cy Young predictor...and Jake is ahead by a pretty good amount now...

 

http://www.espn.com/mlb/features/cyyoung

 

So who's really in Cy Young contention here? The predictor doesn't list Hendricks, because I think it's putting a lot of stock in his W-L record. I figure Kershaw could still be in it if he can come back soon and come back strong...but I'm not confident about that. Strasburg's recent struggles and now DL stint are gonna probably knock him out of this. Lester is right there with Jake...and Cueto is probably right there too. Anyone else?

Posted
They talked about Jake being in the running on Mully and Hanley this morning when Bruce Levine was on. He mention W-L being a big factor for a lot of these voters.
Posted
They talked about Jake being in the running on Mully and Hanley this morning when Bruce Levine was on. He mention W-L being a big factor for a lot of these voters.

 

 

giphy.gif

Posted
They talked about Jake being in the running on Mully and Hanley this morning when Bruce Levine was on. He mention W-L being a big factor for a lot of these voters.

It's dumb but I agree that if Jake can get to 20+ wins he probably wins it again.

Posted
The recent reports for Kershaw are encouraging (which sucks from a playoff perspective but that's a different story). I'm guessing if he comes back before September and is anywhere near as dominant as he was before he got hurt he will be the overwhelming Cy Young choice for writers.
Posted
20 wins and a mid 2 ERA would be pretty easy to vote for.

 

Agreed. If Jake gets to 20, that number plus the streak of good pitching it would likely take to get him there would probably push him over the top. Which is incredible considering how frustrating he's somehow been to me over the last couple months. Last year's Cy Young race was pretty unprecedented.

Posted

Dave Cameron answered a question about the NL Cy Young race in a chat today.

 

Greg

12:05 It sounds like Kershaw is nearing a return. In your opinion, what does he need to do to get the Cy Young?

 

Dave Cameron

12:05 I'm an NL Cy Young voter again this year, so I can't be too definitive. But if he ends up throwing another 30 good innings before the year is out, I think he'll probably be the favorite.

 

One person's perspective but its from an actual voter to take it FWIW.

Posted
Kershaw is going to be severely hampered if he's even able to pitch this year, which I still doubt. He needs surgery to fix his problem, rest doesn't fix it.
Posted
So Jesse Rogers wrote a recap of last night claiming that Arrieta is back in the Cy Young race.

 

Then I checked the ESPN Cy Young predictor...and Jake is ahead by a pretty good amount now...

 

http://www.espn.com/mlb/features/cyyoung

 

So who's really in Cy Young contention here? The predictor doesn't list Hendricks, because I think it's putting a lot of stock in his W-L record. I figure Kershaw could still be in it if he can come back soon and come back strong...but I'm not confident about that. Strasburg's recent struggles and now DL stint are gonna probably knock him out of this. Lester is right there with Jake...and Cueto is probably right there too. Anyone else?

 

When your Cy Young formula completely omits Bumgarner (2nd ERA, 3rd bWAR, 6th fWAR) and Syndergaard (3rd ERA, 6th bWAR, 2nd fWAR) from your top-10, I think it might be time to rework your formula.

Community Moderator
Posted
So Jesse Rogers wrote a recap of last night claiming that Arrieta is back in the Cy Young race.

 

Then I checked the ESPN Cy Young predictor...and Jake is ahead by a pretty good amount now...

 

http://www.espn.com/mlb/features/cyyoung

 

So who's really in Cy Young contention here? The predictor doesn't list Hendricks, because I think it's putting a lot of stock in his W-L record. I figure Kershaw could still be in it if he can come back soon and come back strong...but I'm not confident about that. Strasburg's recent struggles and now DL stint are gonna probably knock him out of this. Lester is right there with Jake...and Cueto is probably right there too. Anyone else?

 

When your Cy Young formula completely omits Bumgarner (2nd ERA, 3rd bWAR, 6th fWAR) and Syndergaard (3rd ERA, 6th bWAR, 2nd fWAR) from your top-10, I think it might be time to rework your formula.

 

So you're saying that Kenley Jansen is NOT 2nd in the NL Cy Young race?

Posted

so is Jake relying on his fastball more because he's having a harder time throwing his slider/cutter/jakeball for strikes this year, thus falling behind?

 

(apologies if addressed in another article, y'all should know I can't read those all the way through)

Posted
I haven't investigated this, but I think it's the other way around. He's having a hard time controlling and commanding his fastballs(4 seam, 2 seam, and cutter), and they move so much that if he's not sharp they leave the zone. Since the pitch isn't any easier to hit, hitters just sit central and wait for 2 strikes or a pitch that drifts into the middle of the zone. Since the slider(and the cutters with enough bite to be classified a slider) is almost exclusively a chase pitch, this approach damages it most of all.
Posted
I haven't investigated this, but I think it's the other way around. He's having a hard time controlling and commanding his fastballs(4 seam, 2 seam, and cutter), and they move so much that if he's not sharp they leave the zone. Since the pitch isn't any easier to hit, hitters just sit central and wait for 2 strikes or a pitch that drifts into the middle of the zone. Since the slider(and the cutters with enough bite to be classified a slider) is almost exclusively a chase pitch, this approach damages it most of all.

Yeah, I think this makes the most sense...although that arm slot stat might be worth looking into, which I'm sure Jake and Bosio are already aware of.

Posted
I haven't investigated this, but I think it's the other way around. He's having a hard time controlling and commanding his fastballs(4 seam, 2 seam, and cutter), and they move so much that if he's not sharp they leave the zone. Since the pitch isn't any easier to hit, hitters just sit central and wait for 2 strikes or a pitch that drifts into the middle of the zone. Since the slider(and the cutters with enough bite to be classified a slider) is almost exclusively a chase pitch, this approach damages it most of all.

This seems the very likely reason to me. His FB command early in counts failing him to set up chase pitches so batters are just pretty much auto taking his slider/cutter. Is there any way to get the data on the locations of his slider/cutter last year vs this year in terms of % it's in the zone vs not or how much it's missing the zone year vs year in terms of distance off the plate?

Posted
I haven't investigated this, but I think it's the other way around. He's having a hard time controlling and commanding his fastballs(4 seam, 2 seam, and cutter), and they move so much that if he's not sharp they leave the zone. Since the pitch isn't any easier to hit, hitters just sit central and wait for 2 strikes or a pitch that drifts into the middle of the zone. Since the slider(and the cutters with enough bite to be classified a slider) is almost exclusively a chase pitch, this approach damages it most of all.

This seems the very likely reason to me. His FB command early in counts failing him to set up chase pitches so batters are just pretty much auto taking his slider/cutter. Is there any way to get the data on the locations of his slider/cutter last year vs this year in terms of % it's in the zone vs not or how much it's missing the zone year vs year in terms of distance off the plate?

 

Zone rate by pitch

 

Pitch    2015   2016
Fastball  53%    56%
Sinker    55%    50%  
Slider    48%    45%
Curve     33%    30%
Change    24%    20%

 

Hard to take too much from this since we can't be sure where the cutters are hiding in those first 3 classifications.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...