Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 965
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'm not going to go back on what I said yesterday, so while Ramirez/Olt/Edwards would probably be a decent package for Garza, I'd be a touch disappointed that we couldn't land Jackson. That said, I have no doubt they are trying for the best package possible, and that's all I can really ask of from the FO if that's the final deal. Would be mighty curious what else was discussed and with what other teams.
Posted
Not a great read by any means, but at least it's enough to get me somewhat excited if he's included in the deal.

 

http://www.lonestarball.com/2013/7/11/4513080/neil-ramirez-a-developing-story

Except for those two notes at the end, that is.

 

The article's from July 11, and he hasn't been DLd yet, but hasn't pitched since July 5. But whatever's going on, I'm sure the physical will reveal.

 

And damned if he isn't the whitest Ramirez I've ever seen.

Posted
I'm not going to go back on what I said yesterday, so while Ramirez/Olt/Edwards would probably be a decent package for Garza, I'd be a touch disappointed that we couldn't land Jackson. That said, I have no doubt they are trying for the best package possible, and that's all I can really ask of from the FO if that's the final deal. Would be mighty curious what else was discussed and with what other teams.

 

Depending on whom you want to believe, the possibility exists that the Cubs don't want Jackson. At least it means we just don't like him enough rather than we couldn't get him.

Posted
CJ is the top guy for me.

 

how hard has he been throwing this season?

FB sitting 90-94, touches 97.

 

I like CJ a lot, but if the talk is Ramirez, I think he's got a slight notch ahead on CJ, IMO. I think Ramirez, if healthy, has a slightly higher ceiling than CJ stuff-wise, from the little I know. Both probably slot into our top 15.

Posted
Not a great read by any means, but at least it's enough to get me somewhat excited if he's included in the deal.

 

http://www.lonestarball.com/2013/7/11/4513080/neil-ramirez-a-developing-story

Except for those two notes at the end, that is.

 

The article's from July 11, and he hasn't been DLd yet, but hasn't pitched since July 5. But whatever's going on, I'm sure the physical will reveal.

 

And damned if he isn't the whitest Ramirez I've ever seen.

 

FWIW, he's had shoulder problems before, and had to lower the workload. His MRI from 2011 showed no structural damage. In fact, it was this exact time of year in 2011.

Posted

Tim Cowlishaw of the Dallas Morning News yesterday on Profar: He's definitely less than he was hyped to be, but that's neither a surprise nor his fault. The Rangers do a masterful job of selling Baseball America on their prospects, and as a result some of them get overhyped. That's not a bad thing to do, by the way. All it took was convincing one team to believe in how Justin Smoak was hyped and the next thing you know, Cliff Lee's starting Game 1 of the World Series in a Rangers uniform.

 

I think Profar is going to be a good switch-hitting middle infield player with average power for those spots, maybe 20 HRs at the tops. He's a better long term prospect than Elvis, but Elvis is no longer trade bait with his $120 million deal, so chances are that Profar gets dealt this winter if not sooner.

 

So lets just add him to the deal and be done, Texas.

Posted
IMO, Profar is part of this deal.

 

I'm hearing Perez/Profar/Feliz for Garza/Castro/Rizzo. More info coming soon. Sweeney extension in the works, will man first base.

Posted
IMO, Profar is part of this deal.

 

I'm hearing Perez/Profar/Feliz for Garza/Castro/Rizzo. More info coming soon. Sweeney extension in the works, will man first base.

 

I knew that was the case!! Good reporting!

 

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/JuricksonProfarSpeedo.jpg

Posted
IMO, Profar is part of this deal.

 

I'm hearing Perez/Profar/Feliz for Garza/Castro/Rizzo. More info coming soon. Sweeney extension in the works, will man first base.

 

LOL !

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Cowlishaw - I think Profar is going to be a good switch-hitting middle infield player with average power for those spots, maybe 20 HRs at the tops. He's a better long term prospect than Elvis, but Elvis is no longer trade bait with his $120 million deal, so chances are that Profar gets dealt this winter if not sooner.

He may not be Mike Trout, but I'm pretty sure any Rangers fan on the planet would take "a good switch-hitting middle infield player who can maybe hit 20 HR at the tops" out of Profar right now if it was offered.

Posted
Tim Cowlishaw of the Dallas Morning News yesterday on Profar: He's definitely less than he was hyped to be, but that's neither a surprise nor his fault. The Rangers do a masterful job of selling Baseball America on their prospects, and as a result some of them get overhyped. That's not a bad thing to do, by the way. All it took was convincing one team to believe in how Justin Smoak was hyped and the next thing you know, Cliff Lee's starting Game 1 of the World Series in a Rangers uniform.

 

I think Profar is going to be a good switch-hitting middle infield player with average power for those spots, maybe 20 HRs at the tops. He's a better long term prospect than Elvis, but Elvis is no longer trade bait with his $120 million deal, so chances are that Profar gets dealt this winter if not sooner.

 

So lets just add him to the deal and be done, Texas.

 

To be quite honest, I said that about Profar last year, as did others elsewhere. What Profar is is a guy who is very, very good at a variety of areas, but potentially not elite at any area. There's a lot of value in a guy like that, and I don't think Profar is Smoak, but I think that's a fair statement, and is also why the Rangers made the moves they did (extended Andrus). I think Profar can be very, very good for a long time, but in some ways, what he was was a guy with a high, but not elite ceiling, but also believed to have a very, very high floor.

 

That said, no, I don't think Profar has a remote shot of being in this deal.

Posted
I'm not going to go back on what I said yesterday, so while Ramirez/Olt/Edwards would probably be a decent package for Garza, I'd be a touch disappointed that we couldn't land Jackson. That said, I have no doubt they are trying for the best package possible, and that's all I can really ask of from the FO if that's the final deal. Would be mighty curious what else was discussed and with what other teams.

 

Depending on whom you want to believe, the possibility exists that the Cubs don't want Jackson. At least it means we just don't like him enough rather than we couldn't get him.

 

That's fair. There's a decent chance Jackson is a pen arm. I just would be disappointed, but a case could be made that Ramirez's starting ceiling might be a tough better than Jackson's.

Posted
Tim Collishaw is the Phil Rogers of DFW, but dumber.

 

I thought Randy Galloway was their Phil.

 

Yeah, maybe he's more like the Sullivan, but dumber.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Tim Collishaw is the Phil Rogers of DFW, but dumber.

 

I thought Randy Galloway was their Phil.

 

Yeah, maybe he's more like the Sullivan, but dumber.

Marriotti.

Posted
Following this on twitter by just searching for Garza brings up funny stuff. stuff like "why would the cubs trade garza? literally our only good pitcher"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...