Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

if you think it's a QB's dream to have your primary options be Brandon Lloyd and Jabar Gaffney, i don't really know what to tell you

 

he also fared well last season without spreading the ball around

  • Replies 965
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
if you think it's a QB's dream to have your primary options be Brandon Lloyd and Jabar Gaffney, i don't really know what to tell you

 

he also fared well last season without spreading the ball around

 

If you could read and respond to what is written we might be able to have a conversation.

Posted
your post was just a misguided dismissal, he wasn't in a "system designed to spread the ball around" last year, at all, and he still enjoyed reasonable success
Posted

I don't know how Orton can't be considered good. His last 2 1/4 seasons, 1 being with Chicago:

 

08: 58.5% Comp, 6.4 YPA, 18 TD, 12 INT, 5 fumbles lost, 79.6 Rating

Notes: Pretty mediocre season overall, but higher than expectations. Bears receiving options and o-line were fairly mediocre to below average. Numbers were higher before a high ankle sprain injury halfway through the season that he came back from early

 

09: 62.1% Comp, 7.0 YPA, 21 TD, 12 INT, 2 fumbles lost, 86.8 Rating

Notes: Numbers up across the board, but in a better offensive system with an elite WR and decently good Oline. Note that again, his numbers started out higher and dipped the later half of the season, although no known injury as an excuse.

 

10: 67.2% Comp, 8.1 YPA, 6 TD, 3 INT (Projects to 24 TD, 12 INT), 0 fumbles lost, 96.3 Rating

Notes: Another fast start. Will be interesting to see if he fades again in the 2nd half, but those are some solid numbers so far. WR options are notably worse this season, probably similar to what he had in Chicago in 2008 (Brandon Lloyd was on both squads). No running game to speak of.

Posted
I don't know how Orton can't be considered good. His last 2 1/4 seasons, 1 being with Chicago:

 

08: 58.5% Comp, 6.4 YPA, 18 TD, 12 INT, 5 fumbles lost, 79.6 Rating

Notes: Pretty mediocre season overall, but higher than expectations. Bears receiving options and o-line were fairly mediocre to below average. Numbers were higher before a high ankle sprain injury halfway through the season that he came back from early

 

09: 62.1% Comp, 7.0 YPA, 21 TD, 12 INT, 2 fumbles lost, 86.8 Rating

Notes: Numbers up across the board, but in a better offensive system with an elite WR and decently good Oline. Note that again, his numbers started out higher and dipped the later half of the season, although no known injury as an excuse.

 

10: 67.2% Comp, 8.1 YPA, 6 TD, 3 INT (Projects to 24 TD, 12 INT), 0 fumbles lost, 96.3 Rating

Notes: Another fast start. Will be interesting to see if he fades again in the 2nd half, but those are some solid numbers so far.

 

Pretty sure Orton was hurt at the end of last year.

Posted
It doesn't matter what stats are out there, the Bears did absolutely the right thing by making that trade. Cutler's ceiling is higher than Orton's can ever dream of being. I don't know why QB rating is being tossed around so much anyway, it doesn't mean much.
Posted
I don't know how Orton can't be considered good. His last 2 1/4 seasons, 1 being with Chicago:

 

08: 58.5% Comp, 6.4 YPA, 18 TD, 12 INT, 5 fumbles lost, 79.6 Rating

Notes: Pretty mediocre season overall, but higher than expectations. Bears receiving options and o-line were fairly mediocre to below average. Numbers were higher before a high ankle sprain injury halfway through the season that he came back from early

 

09: 62.1% Comp, 7.0 YPA, 21 TD, 12 INT, 2 fumbles lost, 86.8 Rating

Notes: Numbers up across the board, but in a better offensive system with an elite WR and decently good Oline. Note that again, his numbers started out higher and dipped the later half of the season, although no known injury as an excuse.

 

10: 67.2% Comp, 8.1 YPA, 6 TD, 3 INT (Projects to 24 TD, 12 INT), 0 fumbles lost, 96.3 Rating

Notes: Another fast start. Will be interesting to see if he fades again in the 2nd half, but those are some solid numbers so far. WR options are notably worse this season, probably similar to what he had in Chicago in 2008 (Brandon Lloyd was on both squads). No running game to speak of.

 

The completion percentage is nice, but I'd like to see a better TD:INT ratio in each of those years. I see Orton as a good fit for McDaniels' scheme, but not a highly naturally gifted QB. He's a system QB who has been fitted nicely into a system that suits him.

 

I'd hesitate to call him "very good" because of that – he's only a fit for a certain offensive scheme and wouldn't be very good on most teams.

Posted
Running games aren't that important. Pass blocking and a system designed to spread the ball around are very QB friendly.

 

Saying running games isn't important is wrong for the most part. The myth is that you need to run to set up the pass, not that you don't need to be able to run well at all. Good offenses pass to set up the run, which the Bears tried to do at times, they just can't. Orton had one of the best running attacks in football last year. So did the Saints, Packers, Vikings, Cowboys and a bunch of other good offenses.

 

Only Peyton has shown he can guide an elite offense without the aid of a solid rushing attack year after year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...