Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 490
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.
Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

Why send Forte out there in the 1st place?

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

Yeah, I'll take my chances everytime w/ a RB on a LB 1-on-1.

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

 

This.

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

It's still a mismatch and an underthrow isn't a huge deal when you have a big LBer in coverage who isn't going to look back for the ball. Forte did everything right up until the attempted catch. He tried to catch it like it was a kick return.

Posted

What's the net gain of Orton over Grossman again? Grossman will take sacks because he can't move, but he's accurate on his intermediate/deep throws.

 

Kyle won't take as many sacks but he can't throw a longer pass to save his life.

 

They're both going to throw picks. Pretending that only Grossman does this is stupid.

 

I guess the bottom line is we don't have a QB, again. And we have no clue how to find one.

Posted
What's the net gain of Orton over Grossman again? Grossman will take sacks because he can't move, but he's accurate on his intermediate/deep throws.

 

Kyle won't take as many sacks but he can't throw a longer pass to save his life.

 

They're both going to throw picks. Pretending that only Grossman does this is stupid.

 

I guess the bottom line is we don't have a QB, again. And we have no clue how to find one.

Grossman's problem is not sacks, it's the panic thing. He's like a lobotomized Favre out there

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

It's still a mismatch and an underthrow isn't a huge deal when you have a big LBer in coverage who isn't going to look back for the ball. Forte did everything right up until the attempted catch. He tried to catch it like it was a kick return.

 

Why criticize a running back for not displaying wide receiver skills when the ball was underthrown in the first place? The underthrow is a huge deal when your guy has a couple steps on the coverage.

Posted
What's the net gain of Orton over Grossman again? Grossman will take sacks because he can't move, but he's accurate on his intermediate/deep throws.

 

Kyle won't take as many sacks but he can't throw a longer pass to save his life.

 

They're both going to throw picks. Pretending that only Grossman does this is stupid.

 

I guess the bottom line is we don't have a QB, again. And we have no clue how to find one.

Grossman's problem is not sacks, it's the panic thing. He's like a lobotomized Favre out there

Orton isn't exactly Mr. Cool out there.

Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

It's still a mismatch and an underthrow isn't a huge deal when you have a big LBer in coverage who isn't going to look back for the ball. Forte did everything right up until the attempted catch. He tried to catch it like it was a kick return.

 

Why criticize a running back for not displaying wide receiver skills when the ball was underthrown in the first place? The underthrow is a huge deal when your guy has a couple steps on the coverage.

It's not like they just drew the play up on the sidelines. They've clearly practiced it and Forte should know how to catch a pass. It would be great if the throw was perfect, but in that situation, an underthrow isn't that bad. Since the LBer won't turn to look for the ball, the odds of clean interception are very low. An underthrow also significantly increases the chances for a PI call.

Posted
That was a good job by McKie to recognize early that Orton was going to run and block the defender off to allow Orton to dive for the first.
Posted
I don't understand the hatred of that play. Had Forte not tried to catch the ball in his right armpit, it's a TD. And the interception was pure luck.

 

The interception was luck, but Forte had his man beat and Orton underthrew the ball.

It's still a mismatch and an underthrow isn't a huge deal when you have a big LBer in coverage who isn't going to look back for the ball. Forte did everything right up until the attempted catch. He tried to catch it like it was a kick return.

 

Why criticize a running back for not displaying wide receiver skills when the ball was underthrown in the first place? The underthrow is a huge deal when your guy has a couple steps on the coverage.

It's not like they just drew the play up on the sidelines. They've clearly practiced it and Forte should know how to catch a pass. It would be great if the throw was perfect, but in that situation, an underthrow isn't that bad. Since the LBer won't turn to look for the ball, the odds of clean interception are very low. And underthrow also significantly increases the chances for a PI call.

 

Underthrows are great if you have a WR who can take advantage of them and it's part of the repertoire. I highly doubt that was the plan there. It was just a bad throw. And it's not a difficult throw either. As long as we have a QB who can't put that one on the money, we're not going to have a very good offense. That's the long & short of it for me. The guy got lucky on the INT. A good throw and he can't get lucky.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...