Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

But the magic number wag if doing it is wrong. Hiw are you defending it? Even leaving out the second team, the most Arizona can win is 93 games. cubs have 82 AND WIN THE TIEBREAKER. so 93 wins is enough. You are arguing based on a flawed stat. To beat out Az they need 93 wins. Magic number is 11. And that doesn’t even count the fact that either Az or SD has to lose 1.2 or 3 more games. Which lowers the magic number. 

Im not defending it, just saying the poster was technically right in the way its always been done and still used today.

Yea if you consider the tie breaker rule, the cubs dont have to win that extra game, and im sure they won't hold off their celebration for it 😅😅

 

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Phillies only have +37 run differential.  Cubs are up +100 run differential on them. It would be wild if we didn't get the top WC seed.  Either way, we're probably playing them the first round.  League's best hitting vs leagues best pitching would be fun.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Phillies just choked it hard, Cubs style

Given what's lately happened to the Cubs, I say turn about is fair play.  It's about time.

Posted
5 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

No. If Arizona wins out what is the most SD can win? They would lose 3 games. Cubs only have to beat one of those teams. SD would have 71 loses. If they go 2-1 in that series one team would have to lose 70 games. It is a mathematical certainty one of those teams will lose 70 games. So why isn’t the Cubs major number 10. That would give them 92 wins. They win the tiebreaker. 
And even with your scenerio if beating out SD didn’t exist(which it does), the Cubs don’t have to win more games then Arizona, they just have to tie them. So it isn’t 12, even with your explanation, which leaves out SD.

If the Cubs win 92 games they can’t not be in the playoffs. Period! So if they have 82 wins then the magic number is 10. 

IMG_1212.thumb.png.b4cc115a1813a6406834efafef95f704.png

  • Disagree 1
Posted

Phillies lost, Cubs back to WC1

Padres up 7-1 over Giants so looking like they will stay 2.5 games behind the Cubs (3 in loss column)

Diamondbacks and Rangers tied at 1 midway through the game. 
 

In unrelated results, the White Sox swoon is continuing with a loss to the Cardinals. They are now just 1 game ahead of the Guardians for 1st place in the Central, and 1 game ahead of the Astros for a bye to the ALDS.  If they fall out of 1st they are still in decent shape for the playoffs as they’re 3 games ahead of Toronto for what would be WC3.  But going from a bye into the ALDS to a road WC series against the Yankees would certainly be a change in fortunes for them. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Rangers are falling apart, looks like the DBacks are gonna win again

Rangers just aren't good, how the hell did the Cubs lose 2 of 3 to them?  Kelly is awful and they couldn't do more damage than 1 run.

Posted

Still don't believe the Diamondbacks are all that good, Rangers however, are terrible.  Thought the Cubs might be able to pick up a game on Diamondbacks, don't see the Rangers beating them.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Stratos said:

Phillies only have +37 run differential.  Cubs are up +100 run differential on them. It would be wild if we didn't get the top WC seed.  Either way, we're probably playing them the first round.  League's best hitting vs leagues best pitching would be fun.

Nothing compared to the Marlins (-57) and D Backs (-15) taking the final wild card seeds over the Cubs (+96) and padres (+104) back in 2023). 

Edited by Geographyhater8888
  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
3 hours ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

Currently a 1.5 war gap away from history at 35.2. And by % of war coming from the position side, they blow everyone away. 

 

When we are talking hitting war are they talking the war of the Cubs line up as a whole, which includes defense, or just offense? In other words, maybe Happ is 1.3WAR offensively but overall WAR of 2.3. When we see the Cubs line up total of 35+, what number are they giving Happ? His strictly offense WAR or his total? 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

When we are talking hitting war are they talking the war of the Cubs line up as a whole, which includes defense, or just offense? In other words, maybe Happ is 1.3WAR offensively but overall WAR of 2.3. When we see the Cubs line up total of 35+, what number are they giving Happ? His strictly offense WAR or his total? 

Combined offense and defense.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
11 hours ago, chibears55 said:

Its not about thinking for myself...

Like I said you can look at it your way and use the tie breaker or you can  play along with the whole magic number way of doing it.

It doesn't consider tie breakers, it just goes by how many games can be won by the non playoff teams.

So, the OP who posted 13, he was technically right in the spirit of using the magic number way of elimination.

Its 12 now, Cubs can win 6 in a row and Padres can lose 6 in a row and its over, and that SD AZ series and the tie breaker means nothing to the Cubs.

 

 

 

 

I get it. Just seems strange to me that it wouldn’t correct itself to take into account tie breakers. I mean different situation and there was only one spot available, if a combination of Cubs wins and Dbacks loses only totaled 12, the Cubs would win. I feel MLB should be able to figure that into the equation. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...