Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

We can blame Tom all we want, but if Theo were here I can almost guarantee we’d be in a better spot. He had balls and brains. Jed has neither. 
 

 

Edited by ToolDRT
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Irrelevant Dude said:

Nope. Why would we be?  His only real credentials are being Theo and Tom's guy.

I don't recall him being very good with SD when he was the GM 

North Side Contributor
Posted

So I'll say this: I actually think Jed Hoyer is a good GM. I think he's got a good vision in his head, and I think he's really good at identifying  margins-players. I think he can communicate his vision to others well. I think he's good at determining a market, and a value, and I think he's highly disciplined in that regards. My fear is that this is all Jed is, however, and that the thing he's missing is the thing Epstein had: he had the ability to get irrational about a player. Maybe to a fault (why I think Jed and Theo were a good pairing to begin with). If that's the case, then I still think Hoyer's a good GM...just maybe not for a large market team like the Cubs. There seems to be a hesitancy to go past that value in both trade and free agency, however. 

We'll see. I hope this is wrong. There's still time in 2023/24's offseason to change my perception of him.

Posted
3 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

I actually think Jed Hoyer is a good GM. I think he's got a good vision in his head, and I think he's really good at identifying  margins-players. I think he can communicate his vision to others well. I think he's good at determining a market, and a value, and I think he's highly disciplined in that regards.

I don't think he is particularly good at identifying "margins-players".  Just look at the guys he signed last year and the unnecessary dead money they created on the payroll.  In general though, I think Jed is a really smart guy and would be a very good GM in a vacuum, but unfortunately for him the other MLB teams don't operate in a vacuum.  In video game terms, he might dominate the single player mode, but he camps in a corner in multiplayer, afraid to make the wrong move and expose himself to enemy fire.

  • Like 2
North Side Contributor
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

I don't think he is particularly good at identifying "margins-players".  Just look at the guys he signed last year and the unnecessary dead money they created on the payroll.  In general though, I think Jed is a really smart guy and would be a very good GM in a vacuum, but unfortunately for him the other MLB teams don't operate in a vacuum.  In video game terms, he might dominate the single player mode, but he camps in a corner in multiplayer, afraid to make the wrong move and expose himself to enemy fire.

When I say margins, I mean more along the lines of building a really wonderful defense/speed team. Players who win on the margins. Sorry if that was unclear, I could have worded it better on second thought!

Edited by 1908_Cubs
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Bobson Dugnutt said:

I, too, am very disappointed the Cubs didn’t acquire a guy that averages 66 (major league—I see you @We Got The Whole 9) IP per year.


He will probably pitch 200 innings in 2024 and … lose in the NLDS. 

Edited by JHBulls
Posted

Rich Harden was an awesome trade for the Cubs because they already had Z, Lilly, and Demp. In a similar situation, Glasnow is a fun idea. He is not what this rotation needs and far from the make or break to the offseason y’all are making him out to be. I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Bobson Dugnutt said:

I, too, am very disappointed the Cubs didn’t acquire a guy that averages 66 (major league—I see you @We Got The Whole 9) IP per year.

Do...do you think he has a good chance of ending up back in the minors?

Posted
2 hours ago, 17 Seconds said:

jed is a coward

I don't think that's it.  He just fired Ross and hired Counsell.  He was very aggressive there and that took a ton of balls.

Posted
1 minute ago, Bertz said:

Do...do you think he has a good chance of ending up back in the minors?

Lay it out for me. What’s the point you’re trying to make? I love you Bertz…truly one of the most insightful posters on this board. But is your point that we should be considering 2017, damn near two whole presidential terms ago and a year when he was sent down for control issues, as relevant to the discussion? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

Frankly, I’m a little confused why the Dodgers want to extend Glasnow given his health history. 

Buy low?

Posted

If we’re being charitable I can pump it up to 78 IP per year, including habitual minor league stints, from 2018-2023.*

 

Were doomed!


Good for Glasnow though. Super glad for him he wound up in an organization renowned for keeping starting pitchers healthy.

 

*I’m drunk on a train so these numbers might be garbage.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...