Week 2 - Chicago Bears @ Denver Broncos - Sunday 9/15 at 3:25 on FOX

[Derwood]

No one deserved to win that game. I was cheering for a tie

[raw]

I've never been less happy about anything positive in my life.

 

Sent from my moto e5 supra using Tapatalk

[SpongeWorthy]

thanks refs

[sweetpeteman]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

[PackLandVA]

Who was the "roughing" on, and was it a legit call?

[UMFan83]

yay the Bears won dramatically and everything is fine

 

http://e.lvme.me/rovlta9.jpg

 

 

Nothing is fine obviously but they’ve bought themselves another week to figure out how to be good again.

 

Reminds me a little of the 01-02 Bears except that the 01 Bears defense was definitely more of a fluke than the 18-19 one is

Edited September 15, 2019 by UMFan83

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

It wasn't roughing the passer, either.

[Soul]

Who was the "roughing" on, and was it a legit call?

It was utterly illegitimate

[TMan92]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

It wasn't roughing the passer, either.

 

We got screwed on a couple calls. That’s a pretty big win. Good to see Mitch make a play and the kicker was nails.

[UMFan83]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

Yeah I definitely don’t think they did and probably a bad play by whatever defender touched him down (I think? I forget if “giving yourself up” to be down is a thing)

[TMan92]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

Yeah I definitely don’t think they did and probably a bad play by whatever defender touched him down (I think? I forget if “giving yourself up” to be down is a thing)

 

Playing football at that altitude is a joke. Screw the Broncos.

[Sosa21MVP]

That game was an abomination but I enjoyed the winning kick by Eddy. Go Bears!*

 

*2005 Bears in full effect

[UMFan83]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

It wasn't roughing the passer, either.

 

We got screwed on a couple calls. That’s a pretty big win. Good to see Mitch make a play and the kicker was nails.

 

Yes I’m glad to see Mitch finally make a play too. Maybe he can make more than 1 next week :)

[minnesotacubsfan]

what a horsefeathering win. LOVE having a FG kicker.

 

offense, lets figure this horsefeathers out ok

[WrigleyField 22]

Nagy is definitely broke except on the one thing that we joked broke him. That turned out great.

 

So I wanted 15 QBs in rookie mini camp next year.

[Soul]

what a horsefeathering win. LOVE having a FG kicker.

 

offense, lets figure this horsefeathers out ok

Baby steps. One big throw this week. Two next week. And so on.

[d_money]

what a horsefeathering win. LOVE having a FG kicker.

 

offense, lets figure this horsefeathers out ok

Baby steps. One big throw this week. Two next week. And so on.

Pace needs to bitch out Nagy. They’re regressing.

[BigSlick]

anyone feeling more rather than less encouraged after this win is almost like alien to me

 

this team looks just atrocious on offense.

[itisallpartoftheplan]

Let's be honest - they did not call the TO in time.

 

Yeah I definitely don’t think they did and probably a bad play by whatever defender touched him down (I think? I forget if “giving yourself up” to be down is a thing)

 

It is a thing. As soon as Robinson purposely goes down a timeout can go into effect. Which was 100% being called off screen by Mitch and Nagy. When Mitch comes into the picture isn’t the first time asking for time.

[Wilson A2000]

what a horsefeathering win. LOVE having a FG kicker.

 

offense, lets figure this horsefeathers out ok

Baby steps. One big throw this week. Two next week. And so on.

Pace needs to bitch out Nagy. They’re regressing.

 

They’re regressing because Pace drafted the wrong QB

[UMFan83]

Also, can anyone explain why a delay of game penalty, followed by an offsides penalty leads to a 2 point conversion attempt from the 1? Shouldn’t the offsides have negated the first penalty leading to a 2 point conversion try from the 2? Or could it have been half the distance from the goal, thus a 2 point try from the 3.5 yard line?

 

Very confused how offsetting penalties ultimately benefit the Broncos?

[Wilson A2000]

Also, can anyone explain why a delay of game penalty, followed by an offsides penalty leads to a 2 point conversion attempt from the 1? Shouldn’t the offsides have negated the first penalty leading to a 2 point conversion try from the 2? Or could it have been half the distance from the goal, thus a 2 point try from the 3.5 yard line?

 

Very confused how offsetting penalties ultimately benefit the Broncos?

 

Thought I heard that you can choose to go back to the original spot at the 2 or go back to the kick location for two point conversions or something like that.

[raw]

Also, can anyone explain why a delay of game penalty, followed by an offsides penalty leads to a 2 point conversion attempt from the 1? Shouldn’t the offsides have negated the first penalty leading to a 2 point conversion try from the 2? Or could it have been half the distance from the goal, thus a 2 point try from the 3.5 yard line?

 

Very confused how offsetting penalties ultimately benefit the Broncos?

 

Two-point conversion is from the 2. PAT from like the 15 or something like that. So, when they got the offsides they decided to go for 2 from half the distance to the goalline (AKA the 1), instead of the PAT from the 10.

[UMFan83]

Also, can anyone explain why a delay of game penalty, followed by an offsides penalty leads to a 2 point conversion attempt from the 1? Shouldn’t the offsides have negated the first penalty leading to a 2 point conversion try from the 2? Or could it have been half the distance from the goal, thus a 2 point try from the 3.5 yard line?

 

Very confused how offsetting penalties ultimately benefit the Broncos?

 

Two-point conversion is from the 2. PAT from like the 15 or something like that. So, when they got the offsides they decided to go for 2 from half the distance to the goalline (AKA the 1), instead of the PAT from the 10.

 

It still doesn’t make sense to me. The 2 point conversion attempt would have been from the 7 after the Broncos penalty or 20 if they go for one. The Bears commit a 5 yard penalty, so that would mean either a 2 point try from the 2 again, or if it’s half the distance to the goal since the penalty occurred inside the 10 yard line than it would be a try from 3.5 yards out. Not sure why regular football rules wouldn’t apply here even if it’s a special play

[raw]

Also, can anyone explain why a delay of game penalty, followed by an offsides penalty leads to a 2 point conversion attempt from the 1? Shouldn’t the offsides have negated the first penalty leading to a 2 point conversion try from the 2? Or could it have been half the distance from the goal, thus a 2 point try from the 3.5 yard line?

 

Very confused how offsetting penalties ultimately benefit the Broncos?

 

Two-point conversion is from the 2. PAT from like the 15 or something like that. So, when they got the offsides they decided to go for 2 from half the distance to the goalline (AKA the 1), instead of the PAT from the 10.

 

It still doesn’t make sense to me. The 2 point conversion attempt would have been from the 7 after the Broncos penalty or 20 if they go for one. The Bears commit a 5 yard penalty, so that would mean either a 2 point try from the 2 again, or if it’s half the distance to the goal since the penalty occurred inside the 10 yard line than it would be a try from 3.5 yards out. Not sure why regular football rules wouldn’t apply here even if it’s a special play

 

Where are you getting 7?