Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted (edited)

 

Again, i personally am not opposed to this deal. I just don't think it's a hot take to be puzzled by this. A reasonable person can look at this and say that it's not a good idea. That doesn't mean they are correct. It just means it's a fair take.

Will you think this isn't a good deal if we sign Ohtani then bring in 1 or 2 AAAA filler types (Garza, Gee, Buchholz, etc)? Or if the 6-man rotation has some legs and we add Cobb and Ohtani? Or if we trade for a SP of a Cobb level? If you think this is our only significant SP add of the offseason then I get the hate/worry but I highly doubt it is and very well could be the "worst" pitcher we add.

 

I don't think it's a bad deal right now. I am not saying it's a bad deal. I'm saying it's not crazy to be opposed to this.

 

I fully expect them to add a starting pitcher much better than Chatwood, whether it's Ohtani or someone else.

Edited by CP_414
  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
basically everything about that question from derwood was weird as horsefeathers but i ignored it because i didn't want to pile on him more
Posted
basically everything about that question from derwood was weird as horsefeathers but i ignored it because i didn't want to pile on him more

 

David just scooting on past a chance to pile on derwood

MjkzNDU1MQ.gif

Posted
less than 1 WAR per season

 

Where are you getting this?

 

5.1 fWAR in 6 "seasons"

 

but fWAR doesn't like GB guys who don't strike many out.

 

Do you think that's a flaw with fWAR or do you think that's a flaw with guys who don't strike many out?

Posted

 

Where are you getting this?

 

5.1 fWAR in 6 "seasons"

 

but fWAR doesn't like GB guys who don't strike many out.

 

Do you think that's a flaw with fWAR or do you think that's a flaw with guys who don't strike many out?

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

Posted

 

5.1 fWAR in 6 "seasons"

 

but fWAR doesn't like GB guys who don't strike many out.

 

Do you think that's a flaw with fWAR or do you think that's a flaw with guys who don't strike many out?

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

Posted

 

Do you think that's a flaw with fWAR or do you think that's a flaw with guys who don't strike many out?

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

 

I didn't say that anywhere.

 

I was explaining the reason for the discrepancy between his fWAR and his bWAR

Posted
it's weird to me that people can't see the argument for this signing being puzzling, or not all that intriguing.

 

Agreed even as someone who doesn’t outright dislike it.

 

 

Solid as a muh

 

Honestly just on pure dollars I prefer this to Cobb. Neither is an innings eater or an ace, might as well pick the cheaper one and let them coast in front of this offense for as many innings as they’ve got.

 

am i the only one who thinks "solid as a muh" and "don't outright dislike" mean very different things, even in the way of subjective statements that are open to interpretation?

Posted

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

 

I didn't say that anywhere.

 

I was explaining the reason for the discrepancy between his fWAR and his bWAR

 

Gotcha. Because you said fWAR doesn't like GB pitchers who don't strike everyone out I took it as you thinking that bWAR was more accurate for a player like Chatwood. So I'm just saying that fWAR is probably correct to not like pitchers who don't strike many out and who walk a lot, but I misinterpreted what you were saying.

Posted

 

Do you think that's a flaw with fWAR or do you think that's a flaw with guys who don't strike many out?

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

...did I mention he pitches in Coors?

Posted (edited)

For every positive thing I find (statcast data, GB rate) there is something that offsets it (walk rate, strikeout rate). But, that is probably true for every 5th starter in the league.

 

Can’t really say if I like it, but I don’t hate it. How’s that for analysis?

 

I trust the research and analysis capability of the FO though.

Edited by Bruno7481
Posted

 

I don't think it's a flaw with anything. I just think fWAR/FIP can't be blindly applied and FIP beaters do exist.

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

...did I mention he pitches in Coors?

 

Did i mention his road peripherals? That's what this whole thing is about. The guy wrote that his road peripherals are not much better than his home ones.

Posted
For every positive thing I find (statcast data, GB rate) there is something that offsets it (walk rate, strikeout rate).

 

Can’t really say if I like it, but I don’t hate it. How’s that for analysis?

 

I trust the research and analysis capability of the FO though.

 

Agreed. I see why people are excited about his potential. I see why people think this isn't smart.

Posted
basically everything about that question from derwood was weird as horsefeathers but i ignored it because i didn't want to pile on him more

 

I know nothing about him, so I was just curious. Why is that weird?

Posted

 

Is Chatwood a FIP beater? His ERA is pretty close to his FIP and almost identical to his xFIP for his career. It looks to me like he's getting the results that he has deserved to this point.

...did I mention he pitches in Coors?

 

Did i mention his road peripherals? That's what this whole thing is about. The guy wrote that his road peripherals are not much better than his home ones.

If you want to answer the question of if he is a FIP beater, you can't just look at his overall ERA compared to his FIP for obvious, altitude-involved reasons. (He is clearly a FIP beater)

Posted
Is Chatwood a guy who might be groomed as a closer later in his career?

without being able to strike anybody out and with a lot of walks? I doubt it.

 

Wade Davis in 2011 as a starter: 5.1 K/9, 3.1 BB/9

Wade Davis in 2012 as a reliever: 11.1 K/9, 3.7 BB/9

 

Chatwood last year: 7.3 K/9, 4.7 BB/9

 

Not saying he will become a closer, let alone a good one like Davis, but there is precedent for a mediocre starter with a middling K/BB rate to become a dominant reliever by increasing his K rate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...