Garza to Texas for CJ Edwards, Olt, Grimm & Neil Ramirez

[Castros trade value]

Sveum was 100% incorrect.

[Old Style]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

[Smack]

so in 160 ip, Edwards has surrendered 0 home runs?

 

wow, that's impressive

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

 

.290/.410/.710 with 4 2B and 3 HR in last 31 at-bats.

 

very small sample but does suggest he can see.

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

Indeed. He had floaters which will [expletive] with you at first but arent anything to worry about.

[Clem Fandango]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

 

.290/.410/.710 with 4 2B and 3 HR in last 31 at-bats.

 

very small sample but does suggest he can see.

 

That may have more to do with him adjusting his swing a bit.

 

http://espn.go.com/dallas/mlb/story/_/id/9459392/texas-rangers-prospect-mike-olt-tapping-manny-ramirez-wisdom

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

[Tangled Up in Plaid]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

meh, I don't care about ks or batting average.

[Guest]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

 

he's 5'10"

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

Olt doesnt have the PAs in AAA to compare him to Jackson yet.

[Tangled Up in Plaid]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

meh, I don't care about ks or batting average.

 

They matter if you're K'ing 30% of the time in AAA.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

meh, I don't care about ks or batting average.

 

You should care about Ks for prospects.

[ctcf]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

Probably his frame, lack of other strong pitches.

[Tangled Up in Plaid]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

 

he's 5'10"

 

According to B-R he's 6'2''.

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

meh, I don't care about ks or batting average.

 

You realize you just took the bait.

[abuck1220]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

 

he's 5'10"

 

and 155 lbs.

[ctcf]

While they certainly are relevant and meaningful, a lot of people on here have still managed to make Olt's K% in AAA a bigger deal than it is.

[Guest]

Olt has been on a tear since his vision issues were corrected.

 

But the Ks are still there. He's back to being 2012 Brett Jackson instead of being 2013 Brett Jackson.

 

meh, I don't care about ks or batting average.

 

They matter if you're K'ing 30% of the time in AAA.

 

Again, not enough PAs to judge, especially post-eye issues.

[Smack]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

 

he's 5'10"

 

According to B-R he's 6'2''.

 

That's what BP and MILB say as well... 6' 2"...

[PrimeTime]

I'm okay with this return. Nice thing is we didn't have to give them Russell, so we can still flip him for something good.

[rawaction]

I'm okay with this return. Nice thing is we didn't have to give them Russell, so we can still flip him for something good.

Yep. Russell, Gregg and possibly Soriano and Schierholz still to go.

[Tangled Up in Plaid]

Does anyone know why prospect guys aren't higher on Edwards? His numbers are in- [expletive] -credible.

 

 

he's 5'10"

 

According to B-R he's 6'2''.

 

That's what BP and MILB say as well... 6' 2"...

 

OK, then. Introduce the kid to the weight room and foods with fat and we'll have something.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Again, not enough PAs to judge, especially post-eye issues.

 

Maybe, but only because of the eye thing.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Being listed at 6-2 doesn't preclude him from actually being 5-10.