Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
According to ESPN, the Pirates clinched a spot in the playoffs but still only have a 99.9% chance of making the playoffs.

They're accounting for the possibility of the team airplane crashing.

Posted
According to ESPN, the Pirates clinched a spot in the playoffs but still only have a 99.9% chance of making the playoffs.

They're accounting for the possibility of the team airplane crashing.

 

Mere moments after Ryan Braun hitches a ride on the plane.

Posted
Since the Pirates were swept Sept 1-3 in St. Louis to fall to 71-68, 1.5 games behind Atlanta and Milwaukee for the second wildcard, they've gone 15-3. In that time, the Braves have gone 3-14 to fall 10 games out.
Posted
According to ESPN, the Pirates clinched a spot in the playoffs but still only have a 99.9% chance of making the playoffs.

They're accounting for the possibility of the team airplane crashing.

 

http://i.imgur.com/UDyOtpU.png

Posted
Multiple times the Royals have been tied with the A's and within 1/2 to 2 games of the Tigers and the A's have had higher playoff odds despite the Angels already clinching the West.

I think part of the playoff odds things are based on how well the team has played (not just record) as well as remaining schedule. So that makes sense to me.

Posted
Since the Pirates were swept Sept 1-3 in St. Louis to fall to 71-68, 1.5 games behind Atlanta and Milwaukee for the second wildcard, they've gone 15-3. In that time, the Braves have gone 3-14 to fall 10 games out.

 

They also started off 12-20 on the season

Posted
Multiple times the Royals have been tied with the A's and within 1/2 to 2 games of the Tigers and the A's have had higher playoff odds despite the Angels already clinching the West.

I think part of the playoff odds things are based on how well the team has played (not just record) as well as remaining schedule. So that makes sense to me.

Yup. Oak lands run differential is ridiculous.

Posted

So Phil Hughes had an incentive in his contract where he would get $500k for pitching 210 IP. He pitched 8 innings tonight with only 96 pitches thrown. Predictably the Twins did not have him come back out for the 9th inning, meaning he will likely finish the season with 209.2 IP

 

Edit: ok I just read that there was an hour rain delay between the 8th and 9th innings. That changes the story from "twins screwed him" to "terrible luck"

Posted
So Phil Hughes had an incentive in his contract where he would get $500k for pitching 210 IP. He pitched 8 innings tonight with only 96 pitches thrown. Predictably the Twins did not have him come back out for the 9th inning, meaning he will likely finish the season with 209.2 IP

 

Edit: ok I just read that there was an hour rain delay between the 8th and 9th innings. That changes the story from "twins screwed him" to "terrible luck"

 

Related note, Phil Hughes finished with the best single season K/BB rate by any player with at least 75 innings pitched.

Posted
Good news, Giants: you don't have to worry about the Cubs' grounds crew conspiring to intentionally screw you over being a one-game difference in the division.
Posted
Multiple times the Royals have been tied with the A's and within 1/2 to 2 games of the Tigers and the A's have had higher playoff odds despite the Angels already clinching the West.

I think part of the playoff odds things are based on how well the team has played (not just record) as well as remaining schedule. So that makes sense to me.

Yup. Oak lands run differential is ridiculous.

 

True, but it seems a good formula would de-emphasize run differential the closer you got to the end of the season. It doesn't really matter. There is just no way that it is accurate to say the A's had like a 96% chance while tied with the Royals and say the a Royals were at like 75% with 1.5 weeks to go and the Royals right on the Tigers heels. Going off of memory, but I'm pretty sure that's pretty accurate to what MLB.com showed. Of course, I've heard that projections were skewed pretty bad by the projections that tried to include the Royals suspended game, so maybe it was just that.

Posted
Multiple times the Royals have been tied with the A's and within 1/2 to 2 games of the Tigers and the A's have had higher playoff odds despite the Angels already clinching the West.

I think part of the playoff odds things are based on how well the team has played (not just record) as well as remaining schedule. So that makes sense to me.

Yup. Oak lands run differential is ridiculous.

 

True, but it seems a good formula would de-emphasize run differential the closer you got to the end of the season. It doesn't really matter. There is just no way that it is accurate to say the A's had like a 96% chance while tied with the Royals and say the a Royals were at like 75% with 1.5 weeks to go and the Royals right on the Tigers heels. Going off of memory, but I'm pretty sure that's pretty accurate to what MLB.com showed. Of course, I've heard that projections were skewed pretty bad by the projections that tried to include the Royals suspended game, so maybe it was just that.

 

If you're talking about the ESPN playoff odds, they are terrible because they are based too much on pythag/RD. It's why they had the Cubs way too high early in the season when they were way behind but had a decent differential.

 

And that's without even getting into how silly it is to weigh it heavily with 5-10 games left, like you alluded to.

Posted
Good news, Giants: you don't have to worry about the Cubs' grounds crew conspiring to intentionally screw you over being a one-game difference in the division.

 

Could still screw them on HFA in the Wild Card playoff game.

Posted
Good news, Giants: you don't have to worry about the Cubs' grounds crew conspiring to intentionally screw you over being a one-game difference in the division.

 

Could still screw them on HFA in the Wild Card playoff game.

 

You guys do know that they ended up finishing that game, right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...