Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Refresh my memory Freel can play just about every position right?

 

Yep. He's basically a crappier version of Mark DeRosa.

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Refresh my memory Freel can play just about every position right?

 

Yep. He's basically a crappier version of Mark DeRosa.

 

Well that ship is sailed, is he a switch hitter? I always remembered he always did something to hurt us.

Verified Member
Posted
So the next question is, what is Baltimore's motivation for making this trade? Didn't they have a glut of OF? They don't save any money.

 

They can send Gathright to the minor leagues.

Posted
Depending on the salary configuration, I dont mind picking up a player who could be of use to us if it only cost us Gathright. Now why anyone would want Gathright and Pie on the same team is beyong me. Maybe they can pick up Rajai Davis and Michael Bourn too.
Posted
Refresh my memory Freel can play just about every position right?

 

Yep. He's basically a crappier version of Mark DeRosa.

 

Jack of all trades and master of none, right? He's not a good defender at any particular position. A moderate upgrade to Jose Macias.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Refresh my memory Freel can play just about every position right?

 

Yep. He's basically a crappier version of Mark DeRosa.

 

Jack of all trades and master of none, right? He's not a good defender at any particular position. A moderate upgrade to Jose Macias.

 

Damn you for bringing up the Gremlin. I had forgotten about him.

Posted
Freel is better than Miles and Scales, and is a better defender at 3B than Fontenot. If you can get him for nothing, why not?

 

His last two seasons have both been worse than Miles. Given that he is older, and only marginally better for their careers, I'm not so sure he's even an upgrade to Miles.

 

Freel had a down 2007 where he had an unlucky BABIP, but aside from that he's been better than Miles' career numbers every year of his career. He's a better hitter with a better approach. His defense seems to be aging though, so maybe he's down to Miles' level at 2B.

Posted
Freel had a down 2007 where he had an unlucky BABIP, but aside from that he's been better than Miles' career numbers every year of his career.

 

How was he better in 2008?

 

His AVG, OBP, OPS, OPS+, wOBA, WPA, and most any other metric you can come up with were better than Miles' career numbers.

Posted
Freel had a down 2007 where he had an unlucky BABIP, but aside from that he's been better than Miles' career numbers every year of his career.

 

How was he better in 2008?

 

His AVG, OBP, OPS, OPS+, wOBA, WPA, and most any other metric you can come up with were better than Miles' career numbers.

 

Oh, better than his career, okay. But Miles was better in 2008, he was also better in 2007. Freel is hardly an upgrade to Miles. He's a very similar player who could easily be worse, again.

Posted
Meh doesnt cost us anything, and I like Freels career .360 OBP. Who knows maybe we can catch lightning in a bottle with him. Is Freel considered a good base runner?
Posted
I think Freel is solid on the basebaths....I remember really liking him a few years back with Cincy...really, when giving up only Joey Gathright, there is no downside...if somehow we could get some of that STL pixey dust to rub off on him next time he's down here he could be a really valuable player.
Posted
As long as the Orioles are eating salary, I like this trade. I think Ryan Freel helps us as a team overall then Joey Gathright will help us as a team overall in 09.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Freel had a down 2007 where he had an unlucky BABIP, but aside from that he's been better than Miles' career numbers every year of his career.

 

How was he better in 2008?

 

His AVG, OBP, OPS, OPS+, wOBA, WPA, and most any other metric you can come up with were better than Miles' career numbers.

 

Oh, better than his career, okay. But Miles was better in 2008, he was also better in 2007. Freel is hardly an upgrade to Miles. He's a very similar player who could easily be worse, again.

Pixie-dust Aaron Miles shouldn't count. Normal Freel >> Normal Miles.

 

I've been asking since the Gathright signing why we didn't just keep Pie if we wanted a speed-only guy on the bench. Pie was better on defense than Gathright anyway. So instead we trade for a guy who is a worse DeRosa.

 

Sure seems like Hendry regrets a lot of his off-season already.

Posted

The only way you can criticize this deal is if you would rather have Scales than Freel, because that's what it comes down to. If they don't make this deal Gaithright either accepts the AAA assignment or gets released and there is no point in having him in AAA because if the Cubs really need a CF at some point they could just promote Fuld and get as much production.

 

Overall I think this team with Freel is better than this team with Gaithright so it seems like an OK move. Freel is still on the DL so Scales probably gets to stick around for a little while longer until Freel is ready to go.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I like this trade, Freel's decline be damned. I always liked him.

 

He's our 25th man who can play a lot of positions and can work a count. I think he'll be fine here.

Posted
I like this trade, Freel's decline be damned. I always liked him.

 

He's our 25th man who can play a lot of positions and can work a count. I think he'll be fine here.

yeah, but how many 25th men do we need?

Posted
I like this trade, Freel's decline be damned. I always liked him.

 

He's our 25th man who can play a lot of positions and can work a count. I think he'll be fine here.

Thank you. If he's healthy (which he hasn't been for 2 years), he'll be on a mission. I spent most of 2005 fantasizing about trading Wood and Prior for Dunn and Freel. Seriously.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
..

Jack of all trades and master of none, right? He's not a good defender at any particular position. A moderate upgrade to Jose Macias.

 

Freel: career OBP = .354

Macias: career OBP = .298

 

That's the difference.

 

If you think that difference is meaningful, and that Freel's career OBP has any relevance to what he might possibly do from here out, then you'll be interested.

 

If you don't think a 56-point superiority in OBP is meaningful, or you don't think his career OBP has any relevance to what he'll do now and that he'll probably produce Macias-type OBP's now, then the Macias analogy is apt.

 

I, of course, am too dumb to know. But I do think that 56-points of OBP is meaningful. If freel can be a competitive on-base guy, .330 or better, then he's a useful pickup. If not, then not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...