Just to extend this discussion. (Discussion, not "argument"). With some questions.
I'm not in the least concerned about losing two weeks of Iowa action in September.
I'm more concerned about the months of spring training and minor-league baseball next season that might be lost to the lockout.
Guessing Trajekt is great for hitting. I'll defer on whether it's as useful as facing a daily variety of AAA-pitchers next spring. Do you think it's maybe better than PCL pitching? Beats me. Maybe minor-league baseball isn't even needed for player development anymore, if Traject is actually better! :):)
Jason, developmentally, do you think Ayers is further away on the catching side, or on the hitting side? I'm asking this sincerely. My presumption has been that he hasn't caught for that many years. So that getting more reps and calling more pitch sequences and receiving more sliders and recognizing more when-to-challenge pitches is more of a need for him than practicing his hitting. Am I maybe wrong, and in terms of big-league readiness, his bat needs more work than his defense?
During lockout, is a guy allowed to go to team facilities and use team Trajekt stuff? Or would he need to connect up with some private source? Like, could he move to Mesa and get full access, or is he locked out? (I'd guess locked out). Maybe move somewhere with Tread or Driveline that has Trajekt?
Google says Traject costs only like $15-20/month. Can Cubs cover those costs for a prospect during a lockout, or would he need to be paying those out of his own budget, if he wanted his own Trajekt at home? It's not that bad, really; for him to spend that during lockout, that's a small investment compared to a minimum-wage big-league contract. So yeah, maybe he will do whatever it takes to ensure full access. I wonder how many prospects do just pay for their own?
Is there a good Traject-type system for practicing catching and receiving?