Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Gee ump, where was that 0-1 pitch?

 

HahahaaHAHAH.

 

Gameday shows it was *exactly* where the ARam strike 3 call was.

 

We're getting jobbed today, no question.

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Milt always a pleasure to give you a 3 minute forum to grind your ax. And yeah Froemming's a huge ass and he called it a ball so that people would still be talking about him 35 years later, but seriously Milt, LET IT GO IT WAS 35 YEARS AGO.

At least Froemming has been screwing the Cubs ever since, so it's not like he's done anything to let time heal the wound.

Once a series he lets his presense be known.

 

He's the Ed Hightower of baseball.

Posted
Yep, I'm the one being childish here.

 

You asked a question as to why Ramirez would argue there. I responded with why he or anyone else would say 3 words to the ump in that situation. Is it because I called the Cards a dogbleep team earlier? I honestly don't understand where I'm overreacting here.

 

I am NOT saying you're being childish. I just realize how inane this argument is right now and that the comment I made was very susceptible to a "you're a hypocrite" comment.

 

Maybe I just mis-understood your post. I just got a really bad vibe from it. It sounded like you completely overreacted to what I said. All I asked was why Ramirez argued, and then you completely over-analyzed it. "What? You call that arguing?" It's like we're getting into a semantical battle or something.

 

Just drop it. It's probably my fault that it started, but confusion and misinterpretation are the only reason its continuing.

 

I should have just said nothing at all. You win. I'll concede this argument.

Shouldn't you be on your own board celebrating your win and not in here bating posters?

 

im not up on the lingo, but is that trolling?

Posted
Milt always a pleasure to give you a 3 minute forum to grind your ax. And yeah Froemming's a huge ass and he called it a ball so that people would still be talking about him 35 years later, but seriously Milt, LET IT GO IT WAS 35 YEARS AGO.

At least Froemming has been screwing the Cubs ever since, so it's not like he's done anything to let time heal the wound.

Once a series he lets his presense be known.

 

He's the Ed Hightower of baseball.

lol, yep.
Posted
Yep, I'm the one being childish here.

 

You asked a question as to why Ramirez would argue there. I responded with why he or anyone else would say 3 words to the ump in that situation. Is it because I called the Cards a dogbleep team earlier? I honestly don't understand where I'm overreacting here.

 

I am NOT saying you're being childish. I just realize how inane this argument is right now and that the comment I made was very susceptible to a "you're a hypocrite" comment.

 

Maybe I just mis-understood your post. I just got a really bad vibe from it. It sounded like you completely overreacted to what I said. All I asked was why Ramirez argued, and then you completely over-analyzed it. "What? You call that arguing?" It's like we're getting into a semantical battle or something.

 

Just drop it. It's probably my fault that it started, but confusion and misinterpretation are the only reason its continuing.

 

I should have just said nothing at all. You win. I'll concede this argument.

Shouldn't you be on your own board celebrating your win and not in here bating posters?

 

im not up on the lingo, but is that trolling?

Yes, that would be trolling. He thinks I'm trying to set people or up something, which is really ridiculous.

Posted
Yep, I'm the one being childish here.

 

You asked a question as to why Ramirez would argue there. I responded with why he or anyone else would say 3 words to the ump in that situation. Is it because I called the Cards a dogbleep team earlier? I honestly don't understand where I'm overreacting here.

 

I am NOT saying you're being childish. I just realize how inane this argument is right now and that the comment I made was very susceptible to a "you're a hypocrite" comment.

 

Maybe I just mis-understood your post. I just got a really bad vibe from it. It sounded like you completely overreacted to what I said. All I asked was why Ramirez argued, and then you completely over-analyzed it. "What? You call that arguing?" It's like we're getting into a semantical battle or something.

 

Just drop it. It's probably my fault that it started, but confusion and misinterpretation are the only reason its continuing.

 

I should have just said nothing at all. You win. I'll concede this argument.

Shouldn't you be on your own board celebrating your win and not in here bating posters?

 

im not up on the lingo, but is that trolling?

Yes, that would be trolling. He thinks I'm trying to set people or up something, which is really ridiculous.

 

Let's let this go please on move on to the game. Thank you.

Posted
Yep, I'm the one being childish here.

 

You asked a question as to why Ramirez would argue there. I responded with why he or anyone else would say 3 words to the ump in that situation. Is it because I called the Cards a dogbleep team earlier? I honestly don't understand where I'm overreacting here.

 

I am NOT saying you're being childish. I just realize how inane this argument is right now and that the comment I made was very susceptible to a "you're a hypocrite" comment.

 

Maybe I just mis-understood your post. I just got a really bad vibe from it. It sounded like you completely overreacted to what I said. All I asked was why Ramirez argued, and then you completely over-analyzed it. "What? You call that arguing?" It's like we're getting into a semantical battle or something.

 

Just drop it. It's probably my fault that it started, but confusion and misinterpretation are the only reason its continuing.

 

I should have just said nothing at all. You win. I'll concede this argument.

Shouldn't you be on your own board celebrating your win and not in here bating posters?

 

im not up on the lingo, but is that trolling?

Yes, that would be trolling. He thinks I'm trying to set people or up something, which is really ridiculous.

 

I'm with Illini. You're in a Cub game thread baiting posters. Good show.

Posted
You are right. I really dont understand why Cards fans come to post in the other games thread here at all. They have a real good board with their game thread at gateway why come post in a other games thread here?

While I do post in game threads at Gateway, I try to avoid it, if possible. FanForever usually gives updates to the game, and he's usually a good 30 seconds ahead of me... I often get the outcome of current at-bats spoiled for me when I post there.

Posted
Geez. I know that was mainly on Eyre, but when was the last time Kendall threw out anyone?

 

I think it was when onions were the thing to put on your belt.

 

LOL. Yet another reason to start seeing more of Soto.

Posted
Geez. I know that was mainly on Eyre, but when was the last time Kendall threw out anyone?

 

I think it was when onions were the thing to put on your belt.

 

Gimme 5 Bees for a quarter you'd say.

 

And I think people are overreacting to KyHen a little bit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...