Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
at first I thought Iowa Cubs... huh, this is strange. Please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade...

 

are you saying this b/c you don't want the cubs to trade one or more of their players or because you don't want hendry to trade one or more of his players?

 

I don't want Gallagher to be traded... he seems to be a good kid, and it's nice having inside info on one of the better prospects in the organization.

 

 

what makes you think it's gallagher that's going to be traded? didn't he say he was joining the cubs? they wouldn't call him up to trade him.

 

they'd have to put him on the 40 man roster before trading him... but yeah it doesn't make sense to tell him that he's going to pitch in atlanta when he's being rostered just for the purpose of trading him

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

Posted
When was the last time Sean started?
Four days ago. His next scheduled start for Tennessee would have been tomorrow, which is also Zambrano's next scheduled start for the Cubs. Coincidence or not remains to be seen.

 

Yeah, but didn't his father said that the family was going to Atlanta for the weekend?

 

*shrug*

 

Maybe they just live closer to Atlanta? His start and Z's start being the same day is awfuly coincidental.

 

Yeah, that I can understand. But I agree with NCCF's and your assesment of their starts being the same day is coincidental.

Posted
at first I thought Iowa Cubs... huh, this is strange. Please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade...

 

are you saying this b/c you don't want the cubs to trade one or more of their players or because you don't want hendry to trade one or more of his players?

 

I don't want Gallagher to be traded... he seems to be a good kid, and it's nice having inside info on one of the better prospects in the organization.

 

 

what makes you think it's gallagher that's going to be traded? didn't he say he was joining the cubs? they wouldn't call him up to trade him.

 

they'd have to put him on the 40 man roster before trading him... but yeah it doesn't make sense to tell him that he's going to pitch in atlanta when he's being rostered just for the purpose of trading him

 

why would they have to 40 man him to trade him?

Posted
Moving Dopirak off of the 40-man seems the logical move to get him on the 40-man. Trying to figure out who he's replacing on the major league roster is the biggest hurdle.

 

I think releaseing Miller seems the most logical to get him on 40 man doesnt it?

Posted
Moving Dopirak off of the 40-man seems the logical move to get him on the 40-man. Trying to figure out who he's replacing on the major league roster is the biggest hurdle.

 

I think releaseing Miller seems the most logical to get him on 40 man doesnt it?

Releasing Miller or moving him to the 60-day DL?
Guest
Guests
Posted
at first I thought Iowa Cubs... huh, this is strange. Please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade, please don't be a trade...

 

are you saying this b/c you don't want the cubs to trade one or more of their players or because you don't want hendry to trade one or more of his players?

 

I don't want Gallagher to be traded... he seems to be a good kid, and it's nice having inside info on one of the better prospects in the organization.

 

 

what makes you think it's gallagher that's going to be traded? didn't he say he was joining the cubs? they wouldn't call him up to trade him.

 

they'd have to put him on the 40 man roster before trading him... but yeah it doesn't make sense to tell him that he's going to pitch in atlanta when he's being rostered just for the purpose of trading him

 

They wouldn't have to put him on the 40-man to trade him.

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

me too... i forgot that it was lilly and not Z tonight. Him pitching in Zambrano's spot makes a lot of sense; makes one start and then goes back down.

 

Still, don't they have to do something with Zambrano? Can they put him on some sort of temporary suspension list to open up a spot for Gallagher, or would they have DL somebody?

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

 

yeah, but that wouldn't surprise me. they punished guzman for howry/eyre sucking.

Posted
I can't imagine them pulling anybody from the rotation, unless Zambrano has been traded or is injured. I could definitely see them putting him in the bullpen, even if he doesn't have experience there.

Not trying to be overly skeptical but wouldn't we have heard some buzz about Z getting traded before this?

 

Not necessarily. It wouldn't be unprecedented for a trade to happen without any leaks in advance. It would have happened so fast that the story would be hard to get out there.

 

Although I do doubt that Z was traded.

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

 

Right, but if Zambrano instigated a fight, isn't it stupid not to suspend him for a start? I'd think it would make more sense to give Guzman a start and just go five innings in Zambrano's place, than to call up Gallagher and have to do something with another player.

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

 

Right, but if Zambrano instigated a fight, isn't it stupid not to suspend him for a start? I'd think it would make more sense to give Guzman a start and just go five innings in Zambrano's place, than to call up Gallagher and have to do something with another player.

 

No, I don't believe it would be stupid. It doesn't do the team any good to suspend Z.

Posted
I'm more pumped about Gallagher than the corresponding move. I hope it's not just a one and done thing though, and that we give him a chance to stay up if he succeeds.
Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

 

Right, but if Zambrano instigated a fight, isn't it stupid not to suspend him for a start? I'd think it would make more sense to give Guzman a start and just go five innings in Zambrano's place, than to call up Gallagher and have to do something with another player.

 

No, I don't believe it would be stupid. It doesn't do the team any good to suspend Z.

 

Well that sure encourages an atmosphere of accountability... punch someone in the face and head out to the mound next time it's your turn

Posted
i must say, as much as this season has sucked, at least the cubs are keeping it exciting pretty much everyday here lately. kind of excited about this. gallagher should be good.
Posted

peoriachiefs39, if you're still around, hopefully you could be able to answer some questions.

 

Did Sean say anything, or did the Cubs say anything about the reason of the promotion? Just wondered....

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

suspending him is quite stupid for the team's sake. As far as I know, they can't just suspend him and add a guy to the 25-man roster, there would have to be another move, and that would punish somebody else for Z's actions, no?

 

Right, but if Zambrano instigated a fight, isn't it stupid not to suspend him for a start? I'd think it would make more sense to give Guzman a start and just go five innings in Zambrano's place, than to call up Gallagher and have to do something with another player.

 

Yea to me if this was just a Zambrano missing a start thing, or even somebody else missing a start, then Guz or Marmol would take that start you would think. I have to believe there is a trade or hopefully we are done with the Scott Eyre ERA.(no pun intended)

Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

me too... i forgot that it was lilly and not Z tonight. Him pitching in Zambrano's spot makes a lot of sense; makes one start and then goes back down.

That still doesn't make sense, because tomorrow he'd still be pitching in Milwaukee, yet his father is going to Atlanta.
Posted
oh wait lilly is pitching tonight... well then yeah i suppose it could be zambrano. maybe the cubs decided to suspend him for a start because of the barrett incident?

 

that's officially my guess.

 

me too... i forgot that it was lilly and not Z tonight. Him pitching in Zambrano's spot makes a lot of sense; makes one start and then goes back down.

That still doesn't make sense, because tomorrow he'd still be pitching in Milwaukee, yet his father is going to Atlanta.

 

but his father isn't the one pitching. he said sean was going to milwaukee. though you'd think they would have told sean if he was starting tomorrow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...