Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

This caught my eye:

 

The White Sox are making a "strong, under the radar" bid to trade for Diamondbacks right-hander Javier Vazquez, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The package of players that the Diamondbacks would receive is not known, though it could include a major-league starting pitcher — perhaps right-hander Jon Garland or Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez — and an outfield prospect such as Chris Young.

 

Wow, Jon Garland and Chris Young would be way overpaying

Posted
This caught my eye:

 

The White Sox are making a "strong, under the radar" bid to trade for Diamondbacks right-hander Javier Vazquez, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The package of players that the Diamondbacks would receive is not known, though it could include a major-league starting pitcher — perhaps right-hander Jon Garland or Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez — and an outfield prospect such as Chris Young.

 

Wow, Jon Garland and Chris Young would be way overpaying

 

That would be a bad, bad trade. The Sox should do it.

Posted
This caught my eye:

 

The White Sox are making a "strong, under the radar" bid to trade for Diamondbacks right-hander Javier Vazquez, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The package of players that the Diamondbacks would receive is not known, though it could include a major-league starting pitcher — perhaps right-hander Jon Garland or Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez — and an outfield prospect such as Chris Young.

 

Wow, Jon Garland and Chris Young would be way overpaying

 

That would be a bad, bad trade. The Sox should do it.

 

I don't know much about Young howver Garland is a great sell high candidate.

Posted
This caught my eye:

 

The White Sox are making a "strong, under the radar" bid to trade for Diamondbacks right-hander Javier Vazquez, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The package of players that the Diamondbacks would receive is not known, though it could include a major-league starting pitcher — perhaps right-hander Jon Garland or Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez — and an outfield prospect such as Chris Young.

 

Wow, Jon Garland and Chris Young would be way overpaying

 

That would be a bad, bad trade. The Sox should do it.

 

I don't know much about Young howver Garland is a great sell high candidate.

 

Young is one of the best prospects in the minor leagues.

Posted
This caught my eye:

 

The White Sox are making a "strong, under the radar" bid to trade for Diamondbacks right-hander Javier Vazquez, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The package of players that the Diamondbacks would receive is not known, though it could include a major-league starting pitcher — perhaps right-hander Jon Garland or Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez — and an outfield prospect such as Chris Young.

 

Wow, Jon Garland and Chris Young would be way overpaying

 

That would be a bad, bad trade. The Sox should do it.

 

I don't know much about Young howver Garland is a great sell high candidate.

 

Young is one of the best prospects in the minor leagues.

 

3rd in the Southern League last year IIRC. .277/.377/.545/.922 in a full AA season at age 21. BA said in their prospect handbook that the Sox consider him a MLB caliber defensive CF already.

Posted

He didn't win with any intelligence. He won with pitchers that pitched beyond great.

 

I wouldn't have faith in him. What is he going to do next? Trade Konerko for Chone Figgins?

Posted
He didn't win with any intelligence. He won with pitchers that pitched beyond great.

 

I wouldn't have faith in him. What is he going to do next? Trade Konerko for Chone Figgins?

 

Agreed. There is a saying, "a broken watch is correct twice a day." Or how about the "sun shines on a dog's butt once awhile." Fact is...KW is not a better GM then hendry, heck, I would even say Williams isn't a serviceable Gm. As lawl at dusty said...the White Sox won...despite Williams, not because of his "brillant" moves.

Posted
He didn't win with any intelligence. He won with pitchers that pitched beyond great.

 

I wouldn't have faith in him. What is he going to do next? Trade Konerko for Chone Figgins?

 

Agreed. There is a saying, "a broken watch is correct twice a day." Or how about the "sun shines on a dog's butt once awhile." Fact is...KW is not a better GM then hendry, heck, I would even say Williams isn't a serviceable Gm. As lawl at dusty said...the White Sox won...despite Williams, not because of his "brillant" moves.

That is completely asinine. It was his moves who set the roster. It was him who signed his manager. He traded and signed the pitchers. Give me an incompetent GM if he gets me a world series.

Posted

KW is a joke. That team will be exposed next year when those pitchers aren't pitching way over their heads.

 

It never ceases to amaze me how much credit he gets for trading Lee for Podsenik when that was actually a terrible move that made the Sox offense WORSE last year.

 

 

Would you suddenly consider Hendry a competent GM (if you don't already) had we gotten those last 5 outs in 2003, like we probably should have?

 

Good results don't always imply good process.

Posted
The man set up his team to win a WS. This is ridiculous. He traded for Freddy Garcia, Contreras, signed Hermanson, Jenks also got their leadoff man, their new RFer, and their catcher. Chose the manager and yet you are discrediting him? That is ridiculous. Give credit where it's due. Ken Williams deserves a lot of credit for what the team accomplished last year.
Posted

Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

It's bitterness, yes, but all these moves were much more likely to be bad ones than good ones. The fact that all of these guys ended up having their best years ever (or in Dye's case, his best year this millennium anyway) is just plain lucky.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

It's bitterness, yes, but all these moves were much more likely to be bad ones than good ones. The fact that all of these guys ended up having their best years ever (or in Dye's case, his best year this millennium anyway) is just plain lucky.

I call BS. It is not lucky. It was risky yes but some of these players were quality. A team wins a WS and it's all about luck? Come on. There's more to it than that.

Posted
The players were quality. I'm not hating on the players. The Sox were a good team, I just don't think Williams deserves credit for making the offense worse and picking up pitchers that I doubt even he could possibly have thought were going to play that well.
Posted

The White Sox season just proves what can happen if you have solid pitching and they stay healthy all year. They were definitely weaker on offense than the previous year, but they made the best of the offense they had.

 

I really liked the Thome deal. Bringing back Konerko was a pretty big deal for them as well. If they make a deal for Vazquez, I'd imagine their chances of winning the division will be theirs for the taking once again.

 

And I can't stand the Sox. They didn't sit on their hands when it appeared Konerko might go elsewhere. They got themselves some insurance by trading for Thome. Now that they have both, they have a top notch middle of the order.

 

Hendry appeared to spend his entire offseason salivating over a guy who ended up signing with the Dodgers. I guess it's not a good idea to ignore the most glaring hole in your outfield, courting a guy (Furcal) where you not only had a good in house candidate to fill that position (Cedeno), but could have brought back Nomar for half the price as insurance in the event that Furcal went elsewhere.

 

I've never thought much of Kenny Williams. But, I'm thinking a whole lot less of Hendry. Unless he wows me with a couple of late offseason pickups, I will want him gone.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

It's bitterness, yes, but all these moves were much more likely to be bad ones than good ones. The fact that all of these guys ended up having their best years ever (or in Dye's case, his best year this millennium anyway) is just plain lucky.

I call BS. It is not lucky. It was risky yes but some of these players were quality. A team wins a WS and it's all about luck? Come on. There's more to it than that.

 

So if the Cubs win the WS this year, does that make all the bad moves Hendry made good? Of course not. Every team has a chance to win the WS, winning it doesn't mean you made the right moves, or even competent ones.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

It's bitterness, yes, but all these moves were much more likely to be bad ones than good ones. The fact that all of these guys ended up having their best years ever (or in Dye's case, his best year this millennium anyway) is just plain lucky.

I call BS. It is not lucky. It was risky yes but some of these players were quality. A team wins a WS and it's all about luck? Come on. There's more to it than that.

 

So if the Cubs win the WS this year, does that make all the bad moves Hendry made good? Of course not. Every team has a chance to win the WS, winning it doesn't mean you made the right moves, or even competent ones.

The white sox had Rowand who the previous year had a breakout year yet didn't do so great last year. Dye was a solid pickup for them in RF. Podsednik was their leadoff hitter. Upgraded the catcher position. The pitchers were huge for them but let's not forget most of them came here via trade, waiver pickups, and FA signings. He also picked the manager to take them to the WS. A manager that is better than ours. If we win the WS I will give credit to Hendry, the manager, and the players for getting us there and winning. It's a combination of a lot of things and not all luck. The White Sox did it, we are still waiting and probably for a long time to come.

Posted
Trading one sucky pitcher (Loaiza) for another one in Contreras is not laudable.

 

Neither is picking up a guy who hadn't had a full-season ERA below 4.06 since 1998 (Hermanson).

 

Nor is signing a bar-fighting, arm-burning lunatic like Bobby Jenks.

 

Nor is picking up an injury-prone strikeout king in Dye.

 

Nor is hiring a classless arrogant ass as manager.

 

I really don't see why Williams gets credit from anybody.

 

HAHHAH yet all of these pieces got them to the WS. Why the hate? Is it bitterness? Hey, I'm a Cubs fan and I give credit where it's due. KW deserves credit for winning.

It's bitterness, yes, but all these moves were much more likely to be bad ones than good ones. The fact that all of these guys ended up having their best years ever (or in Dye's case, his best year this millennium anyway) is just plain lucky.

I call BS. It is not lucky. It was risky yes but some of these players were quality. A team wins a WS and it's all about luck? Come on. There's more to it than that.

 

So if the Cubs win the WS this year, does that make all the bad moves Hendry made good? Of course not. Every team has a chance to win the WS, winning it doesn't mean you made the right moves, or even competent ones.

The white sox had Rowand who the previous year had a breakout year yet didn't do so great last year. Dye was a solid pickup for them in RF. Podsednik was their leadoff hitter. Upgraded the catcher position. The pitchers were huge for them but let's not forget most of them came here via trade, waiver pickups, and FA signings. He also picked the manager to take them to the WS. A manager that is better than ours. If we win the WS I will give credit to Hendry, the manager, and the players for getting us there and winning. It's a combination of a lot of things and not all luck. The White Sox did it, we are still waiting and probably for a long time to come.

 

If you want to argue that Williams made good moves, go ahead. I'll disagree mostly, but that's different than saying "He won a WS, so he's good". That's just backward logic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...