Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Wouldn't surprise if Hoyer doesn't add another SP..

Imanaga Boyd Gausman Peterson Rea/Assad and he has Cabrera returning in a couple weeks.

I can see him thinking he has his 5 with Cabrera, with Rea/Assad being his depth for the final month plus when Cabrera returns. 

He'll probably focus on a couple bullpen arms tomorrow 

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

North Side Contributor
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hortonhearsawho said:

According to this guy it was the Padres who offered it and Yankees who turned it down. 😂

 

 

 

 

Bob and Bowden are having nights out there trying to out-do each other. 

  • Haha 3
North Side Contributor
Posted
2 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Wouldn't surprise if Hoyer doesn't add another SP..

Imanaga Boyd Gausman Peterson Rea/Assad and he has Cabrera returning in a couple weeks.

I can see him thinking he has his 5 with Cabrera, with Rea/Assad being his depth for the final month plus when Cabrera returns. 

He'll probably focus on a couple bullpen arms tomorrow 

The Cubs are still in on SPs. Very much so. We might not get any single one done, but the two Seattle arms and the two LAA arms are still in play. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

The Cubs are still in on SPs. Very much so.

I hope so, but like I said it wouldn't surprise me if the focus tomorrow is just on the bullpen. 

Would love to see him add a SP with some control left over another rental. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
2 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

I hope so, but like I said it wouldn't surprise me if the focus tomorrow is just on the bullpen. 

Would love to see him add a SP with some control left over another rental. 

You don't have to hope; they're definitely still focused on a controlled SP. I cannot promise it'll happen, but they're still in on that. Part of the reason they got Gausman is to ensure that the controlled-SP teams cannot railroad them tomorrow. 

They're going to get a BP arm tomorrow for sure. But with the prospects they have left, they can basically make most of whatever they want tomorrow happen. I feel very good where they are. 

  • Love 1
North Side Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Would Seattle trade Munoz? Him and Kirby would be nice.

Doubt it. They're not packing it it in. 

But Kirby remains real. Sharma and Mooney shouted him out specifically. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Yeah , I liked where they are sitting right now . At worst , I think they get a couple of power arms for the pen .  With that said I think they get a SP with control and a reliever 

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

What other good pen arms are available? I've been locked in on Zeferjahn and Morejon.

Weaver / Hoffman  / Brazobán 

Edited by Dfan25
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Still betting on bat you haven't heard mentioned to the Cubs tomorrow in addition to 1 SP and a legit back end reliever.  At worst Kittredge is coming back , and no I don't count him as a back end arm.

Posted
2 hours ago, JD94 said:

 

What a fantastic deal.  We gave up some future bench guys at best. 

Gausman's peripherals look good, pretty much the same as the last 2 years.  Has a bunch of playoff experience too, including WS vs Dodgers last year.  He'd be my Game 1 pitcher.

Would like one of the Angels SP but if he's it and they grab 2 really good relievers I'd be ok with that.

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

They're going to get a BP arm tomorrow for sure. But with the prospects they have left, they can basically make most of whatever they want tomorrow happen. I feel very good where they are. 

Same.  Lots of opportunity to still add.  We got a good SP without giving up a top 10 prospect.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Randall Simon said:

I heard KGs velo is down this year.  

Fangraphs show a small dip from 2025, but it’s still a tiny bit higher than 2024, and it’s basically in line with his career. Don’t see an issue there, unless it’s gotten a lot worse as the season has progressed. Haven’t looked at that yet.

Edit: Nope. 94.4 average mph each of his last 2 starts. Velo is fine,

Edited by Hrubes20
  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
21 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

 

Now that the Cubs have Gausman would that take them out on Holmes? Don’t really want a second rental. So whining play for the Cubs. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Holmes/Weaver is probably the dividing line for me.  I'd be pretty happy about that, disappointed in the lack of 2027 impact but happy enough about what it does for this year to not be too terribly upset.

I do think Gausman has thankfully already closed most of the doors to a disaster deadline.  Gausman+two relievers is an adequate deadline.

North Side Contributor
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bertz said:

Holmes/Weaver is probably the dividing line for me.  I'd be pretty happy about that, disappointed in the lack of 2027 impact but happy enough about what it does for this year to not be too terribly upset.

I do think Gausman has thankfully already closed most of the doors to a disaster deadline.  Gausman+two relievers is an adequate deadline.

Yeah, with Gausman in tow, you have solidified the playoff rotation enough that the team has addressed a big need. We know they will at least add some BP depth. Even an Andrew Kittredge reunion would help there, even if a little underwhelming. 

But going into today the floor of "it's an alright deadline" has been set and there remains a very strong ceiling for it, too. I'm cautiously optimistic. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

Now that the Cubs have Gausman would that take them out on Holmes? Don’t really want a second rental. So whining play for the Cubs. 

I'm just getting flashbacks to last year about trying to trade for cost controlled pitching at the deadline and failing. So I'm kinda expecting them to end up with Holmes instead of Detmers or Soriano now. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Hortonhearsawho said:

I'm just getting flashbacks to last year about trying to trade for cost controlled pitching at the deadline and failing. So I'm kinda expecting them to end up with Holmes instead of Detmers or Soriano now. 

Very well may be the case. I do think they're both set up better prospect wise and option wise than last year to get it done, but the very well might not. 

The biggest difference is in Soroka to Guasman. Gasuman is just a much higher floor so even if it is an off-season trade for the controller arm, the rest of the way is stronger if they end up with Holmes as the second SP.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...