Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 minute ago, cubfansince77 said:

Real good post and points JR....just wish we wouldn't have given up SO much for a guy that it's a long shot to re-sign. Bums me right out.

They gave up what they had to give up. If Amith becomes a star, so be it. He was a top 50-70 prospect when traded. You have to give up something to get something. Parades didn’t hit here and wouldn’t be putting up here what he is in Houston. And again, you have to give up something good to get a top 10 player in the game. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
8 minutes ago, cubfansince77 said:

Real good post and points JR....just wish we wouldn't have given up SO much for a guy that it's a long shot to re-sign. Bums me right out.

I know everyone is super down on signing him back...sneaky feeling it gets done. I don't know. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I think the Cubs will come to the conclusion that this is the guy to go all in on. 

We'll see. I've been wrong...oh man, so many times (he says trying to find any post from 2021 defending Burl Carroway's control and that he'd get it together just to make sure it's scrubbed from the internet)...just a hunch here.

At least, I'll say this; I think we gave up fair amounts. Really you can boil it down to Parades, Smith and Wesneski. Or in other words, Morel, Bigge, Smith and Wesneski. Morel has been terrible, Wes had TJS, Bigge looks like a good reliever (but not as good as his first run - hope he's okay after the scare!) and Smith has had his first good run in the pros, but I'm still kind of bearish on him. I think we'll be okay even if we don't keep Tuck,

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

How much bigger of a market will there be for him over Vlad Jr who signed a $500 million contract when you’re talking about the difference between a 26 and 29 YO? 

For the record, I don’t think he gets $500M either. But we don’t know. I just think you tried finding something negative to say when you suggested he never had a year with a WAR over 6. So wanted to point out that in his last 150+ games his WAR is over 7. This is the wrong threat for this discussion anyway. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, UMFan83 said:

Can we not let the lead off man on every inning

Did a pretty good job of that yesterday and it didn't go too well. Cubs clearly trying a different approach today.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

One is an OF'er and the other is a DH, Tucker has 20 extra points of wRC+ and is a far better runner too. The age here, is doing a lot of work for the contract, but one of them is clearly the better player.

I suspect more teams will be interested in Tucker because he's more versatile. I also suspect he will make less than Vlad on the back end, at least in terms of total dollars. Less years = less $$$$ overall.

Correct. Tucker is better but he’ll be penalized for his age and not to the degree that he’ll make more than Vlad. I would think $450 million tops but someone might go above and beyond due to the lack of any other big time bats on the market.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

I know everyone is super down on signing him back...sneaky feeling it gets done. I don't know. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I think the Cubs will come to the conclusion that this is the guy to go all in on. 

We'll see. I've been wrong...oh man, so many times (he says trying to find any post from 2021 defending Burl Carroway's control and that he'd get it together just to make sure it's scrubbed from the internet)...just a hunch here.

At least, I'll say this; I think we gave up fair amounts. Really you can boil it down to Parades, Smith and Wesneski. Or in other words, Morel, Bigge, Smith and Wesneski. More has been terrible, Wes had TJS, Bigge looks like a good reliever (but not as good as his first run - hope he's okay after the scare!) and Smith has had his first good run in the pros, but I'm still kind of bearish on him. I think we'll be okay even if we don't keep Tuck,

I’m with you on this. But maybe I am too optimistic too. I think they keep him long term. At the very least they will give it a good effort. I think it gets done. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

For the record, I don’t think he gets $500M either. But we don’t know. I just think you tried finding something negative to say when you suggested he never had a year with a WAR over 6. So wanted to point out that in his last 150+ games his WAR is over 7. This is the wrong threat for this discussion anyway. 

I’m not knocking him, I’m trying to convince myself he’ll be a Cub for the next decade or so than anything.

Posted
Just now, Geographyhater8888 said:

I’m not knocking him, I’m trying to convince myself he’ll be a Cub for the next decade or so than anything.

👍

North Side Contributor
Posted
Just now, Geographyhater8888 said:

Correct. Tucker is better but he’ll be penalized for his age and not to the degree that he’ll make more than Vlad. I would think $450 million tops but someone might go above and beyond due to the lack of any other big time bats on the market.

It could be! But I'll say this; I think any contract that starts with a 5 or a 6 for Tucker will be heavily laden with differed money. Real world value probably is between $425-$475m. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, BKHoo said:

That should have been an error. SMH. 

I agree. Bad throw by Dansby. But I have seen Busch pick worse throws. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

I’m with you on this. But maybe I am too optimistic too. I think they keep him long term. At the very least they will give it a good effort. I think it gets done. 

I am also on team optimism. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

It could be! But I'll say this; I think any contract that starts with a 5 or a 6 for Tucker will be heavily laden with differed money. Real world value probably is between $425-$475m. 

This offseason will tell us a lot about how serious ownership is about winning.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BKHoo said:

Yep Nico would rather ground out than get a walk. SMH. 

And he's gotta do his bobblehead thing when he swings at ball four (lol)

North Side Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Geographyhater8888 said:

This offseason will tell us a lot about how serious ownership is about winning.

My hope is that Ricketts doesn't really care much about how the money is spent, and cares more about the total number of the budget is. I think Hoyer would sign Tucker to a big contract.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

My hope is that Ricketts doesn't really care much about how the money is spent, and cares more about the total number of the budget is. I think Hoyer would sign Tucker to a big contract.

My admittedly overly optimistic scenerio would be at the ASB the Cubs have a press conference where they announce they extended Hoyer, PCA and Tucker. What a way to start the last 60-70 games of the season. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

My admittedly overly optimistic scenerio would be at the ASB the Cubs have a press conference where they announce they extended Hoyer, PCA and Tucker. What a way to start the last 60-70 games of the season. 

This is quite the dream scenario but I’m down with it! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...