Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

It certainly is part of it (I'd argue it's certainly not all of it). But also, trading out, say, Bellinger out for the Hoskins/Belt/Naylor crew is unlikely for that trend to continue.

But even a partial season of PCA instead of Mancini/Hosmer/Candelario probably adds a chunk back?  Said a different way, the Cubs were tied for 1st in BsR and by that metric Bellinger was the 4th biggest positive impact, closer to Morel in 5th than to the top 3 of Hoerner/Swanson/Mastrobuoni.  Will they be 1st overall again?  I wouldn't necessarily bet on it.  Would I continue to estimate they're a bit better an offense than team wRC+ implies?  I'd say yes.

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The Cubs outperformed their BaseRuns expectation on offense by 0.15 runs per game.  They underperformed their BaseRuns expectation on defense by....0.15 runs per game.  So the team's a smidge better balanced than their RS/RA would indicate but it all mostly washes out.

Posted
3 hours ago, LBiittner said:

My anticipation has deflated to just blah now.

I need some upbeat cub news 

If it helps....as long as the Cubs are not signing anyone major it seems they can still be in the Ohtani hunt.

North Side Contributor
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

But even a partial season of PCA instead of Mancini/Hosmer/Candelario probably adds a chunk back?  Said a different way, the Cubs were tied for 1st in BsR and by that metric Bellinger was the 4th biggest positive impact, closer to Morel in 5th than to the top 3 of Hoerner/Swanson/Mastrobuoni.  Will they be 1st overall again?  I wouldn't necessarily bet on it.  Would I continue to estimate they're a bit better an offense than team wRC+ implies?  I'd say yes.

Well, that's fair, and maybe I could have been more clear, so that's on me, but I wasn't attempting to imply they couldn't outpace their wRC+ at all, but that I wouldn't expect the 12th best wRC+ team to be a top-6 offense based on their base running. That's a massive jump and one I don't expect to continue. If' we're using fangraphs BsR, while base running adds value it's not a huge jump. The Cubs were 14 runs above average on the bases. Taking them away, the Cubs still scored the 7th most runs in baseball. Do I think the Cubs were the 7th best offense last year? No. I'd buy them being closer to the 9-11 range. Which, is fine, don't get me wrong, but I think the amount of runs their scored makes them seem a tier above where I'd suggest their offense is.

As we enter 2024, I think it's fair to suggest they have components to win on the margins and outpace their wRC+. I don't think the drastic jump from a slightly above average offense in terms of run creation will manifest as a top-6 team in run scoring, too with out some lucky outcomes. 

Edited by 1908_Cubs
Posted
1 minute ago, Stratos said:

If it helps....as long as the Cubs are not signing anyone major it seems they can still be in the Ohtani hunt.

The dirty secret is that they can sign anyone major and still be in on Ohtani.

  • Love 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Stratos said:

If it helps....as long as the Cubs are not signing anyone major it seems they can still be in the Ohtani hunt.

I guess Jed is remaining true to ohtani's wishes and still not divulging any cub/ohtani information?

Now you are giving me a glimmer of hope. Silly me

 

Posted

Not Cubs off-season, but JFC , Yommamoto may go to the Dodgers too. If Ohtani goes and gets $500M and Yamamoto gets close to $300M that will be something. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

One small caveat is that wRC+ is not incorporating baserunning, and the Cubs were an elite baserunning team which is part of why despite being 12th in wRC+ they were 6th in runs.

Exactly.   Cubs were tied for best baserunning runs in the MLB.  Also were 6th in runs scored and 3rd in NL behind Dodgers and Braves is pretty good.

Edited by Stratos
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

Not Cubs off-season, but JFC , Yommamoto may go to the Dodgers too. If Ohtani goes and gets $500M and Yamamoto gets close to $300M that will be something. 

I can see Yamamoto going to L.A. but still believe it'll be either the Giants (who is desperate for a star) or the Mets (because New York).

Edited by NorthsideAvenger
Posted (edited)

Jed speaks:.  Everyone here will be thrilled:

Quote

 

“As I’ve said a lot of times over the years, winning the offseason is probably more curse than blessing,” Hoyer said, per The Athletic. “Cody Bellinger wasn’t exactly a move that people were lauding tremendously last year, and it was probably one of the best free-agent signings on the market.

“You just don’t know where the best deals are going to come from. Certainly, there are immensely talented players on the market, but I think if you go in thinking it’s one of those guys or bust, you can make some really bad long-term decisions.”

 

https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2023/12/07/jed-hoyer-speaks-where-things-stand-winning-the-offseason-a-window-of-moments-and-more/

Edited by Stratos
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

When your major market President acts like "winning the offseason" is a bad thing. 

How did that work out for the Mets last year?

Posted
4 minutes ago, 17 Seconds said:

worked for the rangers

Did it?  They caught some lightning in a bottle in spite of De Grom and Scherzer ending up hurt and still had to add Chapman, Scherzer, Montgomery, and Stratton at the deadline. 

Posted
Just now, mul21 said:

Did it?  They caught some lightning in a bottle in spite of De Grom and Scherzer ending up hurt and still had to add Chapman, Scherzer, Montgomery, and Stratton at the deadline. 

they signed seager and semien to monster contracts the offseason before and people made fun of them

Posted
Just now, 17 Seconds said:

they signed seager and semien to monster contracts the offseason before and people made fun of them

Oh, so they didn't in fact win the '22-'23 off season then.  Got it.

Posted

Jed is 1) setting expectations/maintaining leverage/being noncommittal like basically every exec 2) 1000% correct.  Doesn't mean he can't be too conservative with the moves he does make, but teams that are consistently excellent very rarely are the ones making a flurry of high profile moves.  You can and be successful in the short term and maybe longer if you're good/lucky, but the Padres and Mets provide a very visceral example that it's not that simple.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, gocubs218 said:

Even if they did “win” the off-season they are really the exception to the rule. 

Right now I would be happy if the Cubs qualified for a participation trophy for the off season. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...