Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

Sweet googily moogily

 

Guessing that's including a premium to go play on a 96 loss team.

I'm guessing this is a throwaway line, but I think the Phillies are going to be competitive in a very weak Division (-Washington).

Posted

 

Sweet googily moogily

 

Guessing that's including a premium to go play on a 96 loss team.

I'm guessing this is a throwaway line, but I think the Phillies are going to be competitive in a very weak Division (-Washington).

Agreed. But then I thought they’d be approaching .500 last year.

Posted

 

Sweet googily moogily

 

Guessing that's including a premium to go play on a 96 loss team.

I'm guessing this is a throwaway line, but I think the Phillies are going to be competitive in a very weak Division (-Washington).

 

The East will be quite bad, but it wasn't all that good last year, and the Phillies also are awful light on good players. They need more than a couple above average players to be competitive.

Posted (edited)
i'm not interested in happ for salazar at all.

Agree, I know they are hard to deal with but if the Orioles do start the sell off I’d see if we could do something around Happ for Gausman and Britton.

Edited by Cubswin11
Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

Kipnis? No thank you.

 

Please no.

 

Not only does that not make sense for the Cubs, wasn't the rumor that the Indians wanted LH hitting in return? I mean, that idea is just comprehensively stupid.

Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

Kipnis? No thank you.

 

Out of curiosity why is Kipnis a bad pickup if its a buy low type of thing? He was bad last year but was a nearly 5 win player in both 2015 and 2016, only 30 and a relatively ok contract the next 2 seasons.

 

I know we don't really need an OF, but he's not someone I could completely avoid acquiring in a trade.

Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

Kipnis? No thank you.

 

Out of curiosity why is Kipnis a bad pickup if its a buy low type of thing? He was bad last year but was a nearly 5 win player in both 2015 and 2016, only 30 and a relatively ok contract the next 2 seasons.

 

I know we don't really need an OF, but he's not someone I could completely avoid acquiring in a trade.

 

He's a 2B, not an OF.

 

But either way, I want no part of him. He was barely replacement level last year, injury-plagued and 30. He's just not worth putting us $14 million closer to the luxury tax threshold.

Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

Kipnis? No thank you.

 

Out of curiosity why is Kipnis a bad pickup if its a buy low type of thing? He was bad last year but was a nearly 5 win player in both 2015 and 2016, only 30 and a relatively ok contract the next 2 seasons.

 

I know we don't really need an OF, but he's not someone I could completely avoid acquiring in a trade.

 

He's a 2B, not an OF.

 

But either way, I want no part of him. He was barely replacement level last year, injury-plagued and 30. He's just not worth putting us $14 million closer to the luxury tax threshold.

...but he grew up a Cub fan!

Posted
I have no interest in Kipnis either. FWIW Ralph on MLB radio just now said a Schwarber-Salazar conversation was had and it ended quickly with the Cubs shutting it down.
Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

Kipnis? No thank you.

 

Out of curiosity why is Kipnis a bad pickup if its a buy low type of thing? He was bad last year but was a nearly 5 win player in both 2015 and 2016, only 30 and a relatively ok contract the next 2 seasons.

 

I know we don't really need an OF, but he's not someone I could completely avoid acquiring in a trade.

 

He's a 2B, not an OF.

 

But either way, I want no part of him. He was barely replacement level last year, injury-plagued and 30. He's just not worth putting us $14 million closer to the luxury tax threshold.

 

Sorry I thought I read they were moving him to OF full time, or considering it. Either way, he'd be an OF here. He was worth half a win in a poor injury plagued season. The last 3 years he played 140+ games he was worth 4.5, 4.9 and 4.8 fWAR (2013, 2015, 2016). The injuries are always a concern with him but to add a potential 4+ win player, 14m is not a lot.

 

I'm gonna stop because it sounds like I'm advocating for him, but its more of a 'not understanding why hes a hard pass' type of argument.

Posted
Only way Kipnis makes sense is if we find a way to dump Zobrist (which would be an intriguing upgrade in my opinion), and I can't see that happening with a full trade clause.
Posted

 

Out of curiosity why is Kipnis a bad pickup if its a buy low type of thing? He was bad last year but was a nearly 5 win player in both 2015 and 2016, only 30 and a relatively ok contract the next 2 seasons.

 

I know we don't really need an OF, but he's not someone I could completely avoid acquiring in a trade.

 

He's a 2B, not an OF.

 

But either way, I want no part of him. He was barely replacement level last year, injury-plagued and 30. He's just not worth putting us $14 million closer to the luxury tax threshold.

 

Sorry I thought I read they were moving him to OF full time, or considering it. Either way, he'd be an OF here. He was worth half a win in a poor injury plagued season. The last 3 years he played 140+ games he was worth 4.5, 4.9 and 4.8 fWAR (2013, 2015, 2016). The injuries are always a concern with him but to add a potential 4+ win player, 14m is not a lot.

 

I'm gonna stop because it sounds like I'm advocating for him, but its more of a 'not understanding why hes a hard pass' type of argument.

 

that could be true with regard to the outfield thing. i do know he got some time there, but i figured that was because Ramirez entrenched himself at 2B while Kipnis was hurt.

 

i think he could be a nice bounce back candidate for certain teams. i'm just not willing to gamble $14 million on a guy who doesn't really fill a need for us, will be 31 on opening day, and is showing signs of decline both health-wise and performance-wise. there's better ways to allocate limited resources.

Posted
The Giants are looking at signing Jay Bruce, that seems like a really bad fit but a very Giants move

 

Bruce playing RF in that ballpark would be amusing, at least.

Getting Bruce and trading for Billy Hamilton would be such a Giants offseason. If we were asked to predict their moves I think we could have safely guessed that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...