Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
The only thing that worries me is the stupid inning that their offense will put together of 2-3 weak hits that find holes topped off by a Hunter Pence bloop double down a line that scores a run or 2. Hopefully it's insignificant towards the outcome of the game.

 

Aw, so they lose something like 6-2 instead of 6-0. How cute.

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
i'm gonna get drunk as horsefeathers at wrigleyville north and eat hot dogs from the diner grill and maybe pet a dog because there's usually a dog in there
Posted
The only thing that worries me is the stupid inning that their offense will put together of 2-3 weak hits that find holes topped off by a Hunter Pence bloop double down a line that scores a run or 2. Hopefully it's insignificant towards the outcome of the game.

 

Aw, so they lose something like 6-2 instead of 6-0. How cute.

That's the spirit

Posted
Giants are +215 for this series

 

Seriously, this is insane.

 

 

What does this mean? I'm not a betting man

 

it means that if you bet on the giants moneyline, you would win $215 for every $100 wagered....so you're getting 2.15-1

 

the cubs are -255, which means you have to bet $255 to win $100

Posted
Giants are +215 for this series

 

Seriously, this is insane.

 

 

What does this mean? I'm not a betting man

 

You win back $215 if you bet $100 and they win, plus your original $100. Basically puts Cubs at 70% to win

Posted
538 has the Cubs at 68% to win the series. Fangraphs projection has it at 56.7% (LA is 60%, the highest of any of the 4) but their season stats mode has it at 65.7%.
Posted
Even breaking schtick for a minute, that is pretty great value. Any five-game playoff series maxes out at about 60/40 for the better team. Getting odds 10 percentage points better than that is a steal.

 

Yup. Must fight urge to hedge my emotions with a wager like a douche.

Posted

 

Seriously, this is insane.

 

 

What does this mean? I'm not a betting man

 

You win back $215 if you bet $100 and they win, plus your original $100. Basically puts Cubs at 70% to win

 

That sounds insane but I guess the oddsmakers are trying to balance out all that Chicago money

Posted
538 has the Cubs at 68% to win the series. Fangraphs projection has it at 56.7% (LA is 60%, the highest of any of the 4) but their season stats mode has it at 65.7%.

With the season wrapped up I dont get why the season stats mode isn't the default

Posted

 

 

What does this mean? I'm not a betting man

 

You win back $215 if you bet $100 and they win, plus your original $100. Basically puts Cubs at 70% to win

 

That sounds insane but I guess the oddsmakers are trying to balance out all that Chicago money

 

 

This is what I would assume

Posted

 

 

What does this mean? I'm not a betting man

 

You win back $215 if you bet $100 and they win, plus your original $100. Basically puts Cubs at 70% to win

 

That sounds insane but I guess the oddsmakers are trying to balance out all that Chicago money

 

Well, yeah. I wasn't posting it because I thought it reflected our actual chances. I posted it because of how insanely +EV it seems to be.

Posted
Even breaking schtick for a minute, that is pretty great value. Any five-game playoff series maxes out at about 60/40 for the better team. Getting odds 10 percentage points better than that is a steal.

 

Yup. Must fight urge to hedge my emotions with a wager like a douche.

Yeah I might need to call a guy, those a really good odds

Posted
538 has the Cubs at 68% to win the series. Fangraphs projection has it at 56.7% (LA is 60%, the highest of any of the 4) but their season stats mode has it at 65.7%.

 

 

How can fangraphs and 538 be so far off, and which has been the better predictor?

Posted
i can't wrap my head around how insanely hard it feels to get through the MLB playoffs and come out the champion, and then how the hell the yankees pulled off the late 90's.
Posted
538 has the Cubs at 68% to win the series. Fangraphs projection has it at 56.7% (LA is 60%, the highest of any of the 4) but their season stats mode has it at 65.7%.

 

 

How can fangraphs and 538 be so far off, and which has been the better predictor?

 

Fangraphs is probably wrong, they have some weird glitches. 538 has been treating us like a 120-win team all year and I want to believe but who knows.

Posted
i can't wrap my head around how insanely hard it feels to get through the MLB playoffs and come out the champion, and then how the hell the yankees pulled off the late 90's.

I would imagine it feels like going to a craps table starting with your last $20 and leaving a few hours later with $10,000 because the dice just fell the right way.

Posted

2 funny stats:

 

-The Cubs had a better road record this season than the Giants home record

-The Cubs had a better run differential on the road this season than the Giants total RD for the season. The same can also be said about the Cubs RD at home.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...