Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Yeah, after reading that I'm going to give my daughter the biggest hug when I get home from work tonight.

 

I ugly-cried while reading that. Not ashamed.

  • Replies 8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
If I had said David Eckstein instead of Castro you dorks would be choking on how much you were harrumphing in agreement instead of being all, "well, yes, job security is indeed the true hallmark of a good career in this field of baseball!"

 

Fun fact:

 

Starlin Castro career fWAR: 16.9

David Eckstein career fWAR: 16.7

 

It's almost like that name wasn't chosen at random...

 

You should've shown your work

Posted
Now Jeromy Burnitz...THAT was a really, really good career.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Not a great career, but .253/.345/.481 slash line with a career avg of 30 HRs and 94 RBI would look good in LF right about now.

Posted
Now Jeromy Burnitz...THAT was a really, really good career.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Not a great career, but .253/.345/.481 slash line with a career avg of 30 HRs and 94 RBI would look good in LF right about now.

you cool with that defense?

Posted
Now Jeromy Burnitz...THAT was a really, really good career.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Not a great career, but .253/.345/.481 slash line with a career avg of 30 HRs and 94 RBI would look good in LF right about now.

lol - Schwarber's projection for 2019: .241/.351/.477

 

Why do you hate on Schwarber again?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
CC Sabathia just got K #3000

 

This is as excited as I’ve been about MLB since the Cubs won the WS

 

God, you're weird

Posted
Now Jeromy Burnitz...THAT was a really, really good career.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Not a great career, but .253/.345/.481 slash line with a career avg of 30 HRs and 94 RBI would look good in LF right about now.

lol - Schwarber's projection for 2019: .241/.351/.477

 

Why do you hate on Schwarber again?

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Posted

 

 

Not a great career, but .253/.345/.481 slash line with a career avg of 30 HRs and 94 RBI would look good in LF right about now.

lol - Schwarber's projection for 2019: .241/.351/.477

 

Why do you hate on Schwarber again?

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

Posted

lol - Schwarber's projection for 2019: .241/.351/.477

 

Why do you hate on Schwarber again?

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

Look, B2B has this figured out. Schwarber should have been traded at some undefined time for some undefined players (maybe even to two undefined teams, for two undefined players/groups of players?), and because of that obviously successful trade, the team that has won the most games in baseball since 2015 would be even better.

 

After all, based on the stories we're actually aware of, Andrew Miller was supposedly on the table for Schwarber, and we passed on Miller, which was clearly a huge mistake as he only gave up a game 7 home run to 74 year old David Ross in a game we won by 1. And then put up 2.7 total fWAR in the next two years for $18m, compared to Schwarber's 4.8 fWAR for $1.1m. And then became a free agent, whereas we have Schwarber for two more years. When you look at the facts, it's obvious.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

Look, B2B has this figured out. Schwarber should have been traded at some undefined time for some undefined players (maybe even to two undefined teams, for two undefined players/groups of players?), and because of that obviously successful trade, the team that has won the most games in baseball since 2015 would be even better.

 

After all, based on the stories we're actually aware of, Andrew Miller was supposedly on the table for Schwarber, and we passed on Miller, which was clearly a huge mistake as he only gave up a game 7 home run to 74 year old David Ross in a game we won by 1. And then put up 2.7 total fWAR in the next two years for $18m, compared to Schwarber's 4.8 fWAR for $1.1m. And then became a free agent, whereas we have Schwarber for two more years. When you look at the facts, it's obvious.

 

Well you have to consider the tried-and-true tradition of winning a World Series with a core of 23 year olds, and then immediately trading away key members of that core for lottery tickets

Posted
Am I the only Cubs fan around who wishes we still had Seal Boy? I’d rather have him over Descalso right now.

 

The guy who has 7 home runs in 90 PAs after 10 in the previous 947? Sure? I don't think it's a hot take to say you'd rather have LaStella's April over Descalso's, but I remain pretty confident that we'll have the better player going forward.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Am I the only Cubs fan around who wishes we still had Seal Boy? I’d rather have him over Descalso right now.

 

The guy who has 7 home runs in 90 PAs after 10 in the previous 947? Sure? I don't think it's a hot take to say you'd rather have LaStella's April over Descalso's, but I remain pretty confident that we'll have the better player going forward.

And it's not like Descalso has been a scrub either. He's had a pretty good go of it so far.

Posted

lol - Schwarber's projection for 2019: .241/.351/.477

 

Why do you hate on Schwarber again?

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed we're in the juiciest of the juice ball eras right now.

Posted

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed we're in the juiciest of the juice ball eras right now.

The ball wasn’t juiced last year I’m pretty sure. Burnitz played in the juiciest of juiced players era.

Posted

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

Look, B2B has this figured out. Schwarber should have been traded at some undefined time for some undefined players (maybe even to two undefined teams, for two undefined players/groups of players?), and because of that obviously successful trade, the team that has won the most games in baseball since 2015 would be even better.

 

After all, based on the stories we're actually aware of, Andrew Miller was supposedly on the table for Schwarber, and we passed on Miller, which was clearly a huge mistake as he only gave up a game 7 home run to 74 year old David Ross in a game we won by 1. And then put up 2.7 total fWAR in the next two years for $18m, compared to Schwarber's 4.8 fWAR for $1.1m. And then became a free agent, whereas we have Schwarber for two more years. When you look at the facts, it's obvious.[/quote

 

It's hard to figure out what players we could have received for Schwarber when Theo refused to even consider trading him.

Posted

 

 

There is a difference between actual production and projections. I don't hate Schwarber, I just think that the Cubs would be a better team if they had traded him a couple of years ago when his trade value was high and we probably could have received some young pitching. I admire his work ethic and his majestic HRs, but he is still a DH/platoon OF.

Fine - How about Schwarber's actual 2018 production of .238/.356/.467? Considering most of Burnitz's best seasons came during the juiced ball era, that Schwarber line from last year is more than comparable. He's also rating as an above average defender again, no matter how many times you try to claim that he's best served as a DH.

 

Oh, but I'm sorry. Go ahead and keep banging your head against this one.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed we're in the juiciest of the juice ball eras right now.

 

Current OPS league wide is .742 (245/321/421), which is 18th in the last 30 years. Jeremy Burnitz played over 100 games every year from 1997 to 2006. All 10 of those years had a higher league wide OPS than 2019. 2000 was the highest, at .782.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...