Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
If we're trading both Soler and Baez I'd try to get a better return and package them together and go for it on an established ace, if possible. Gray, Sale Archer, Fernandez... what will these guys cost in addition to Soler+Baez?

 

Schwarber

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
If we're trading both Soler and Baez I'd try to get a better return and package them together and go for it on an established ace, if possible. Gray, Sale Archer, Fernandez... what will these guys cost in addition to Soler+Baez?

Sale would probably take Kris Bryant, so you can forget about that one.

Posted
Hmmm...

 

Hypothetical:

 

Soler package for Miller or Teheran (and/or others)

Baez package for Odorizzi & McGee (and/or others)

Trade Wood, Hammell, and Montero for salary relief and farm replenishing and/or bench strengthening

Sign Heyward

Sign Span

 

How plausible is that? Is that even a good use of resources?

You've got too many arms in the rotation. Make the Baez package include Snell & McGee and I can see it if I squint.

 

But I think I'd rather keep the young bats, trade Montero & Wood (for whatever) to free up room for Heyward. Then I'd go the IFA route to add rotation depth.

Posted
If we're trading both Soler and Baez I'd try to get a better return and package them together and go for it on an established ace, if possible. Gray, Sale Archer, Fernandez... what will these guys cost in addition to Soler+Baez?

Sale would probably take Kris Bryant, so you can forget about that one.

 

Kris Bryant is already more valuable than Sale by himself.

Posted
Hmmm...

 

Hypothetical:

 

Soler package for Miller or Teheran (and/or others)

Baez package for Odorizzi & McGee (and/or others)

Trade Wood, Hammell, and Montero for salary relief and farm replenishing and/or bench strengthening

Sign Heyward

Sign Span

 

How plausible is that? Is that even a good use of resources?

 

The home plate ump might tire of being hit by every pitch.

Posted
Hmmm...

 

Hypothetical:

 

Soler package for Miller or Teheran (and/or others)

Baez package for Odorizzi & McGee (and/or others)

Trade Wood, Hammell, and Montero for salary relief and farm replenishing and/or bench strengthening

Sign Heyward

Sign Span

 

How plausible is that? Is that even a good use of resources?

 

The home plate ump might tire of being hit by every pitch.

 

I don't think having David Ross as the only catcher on your roster is a good idea.

Posted

i mean, [expletive]...teams won lots of games with mike piazza at catcher for years so, meh.

 

i don't see it happening but it's not like it would bother me.

 

can't wait for the replies admonishing me for comparing schwarb to a HOFer

Posted

Is that suggesting Soler and Baez or Soler or Baez?

 

Is Gausman as an elite prospect still a thing? His numbers so far havent been terrible by any means (3.79 career FIP) but not up to his hype level and hes 24

Posted
Is that suggesting Soler and Baez or Soler or Baez?

 

Is Gausman as an elite prospect still a thing? His numbers so far havent been terrible by any means (3.79 career FIP) but not up to his hype level and hes 24

 

He still hasn't developed a third pitch. Teach him a Cutter and a splitter and he has top of the rotation potential.

Posted
Is that suggesting Soler and Baez or Soler or Baez?

 

Is Gausman as an elite prospect still a thing? His numbers so far havent been terrible by any means (3.79 career FIP) but not up to his hype level and hes 24

 

I took it to mean that they like both players I am sure Baltimore doesn't actually think they will get both for Gausman. The more teams that are interested in Baez and Soler the better for the Cubs obviously. So far we have seen Atlanta, Baltimore, and Tampa and maybe Cleveland are all interested in our guys. We should definitely be able to get a good package for one of them.

Posted (edited)
Is that suggesting Soler and Baez or Soler or Baez?

 

Is Gausman as an elite prospect still a thing? His numbers so far havent been terrible by any means (3.79 career FIP) but not up to his hype level and hes 24

I take it as one or the other, Baltimore can't develop pitching to save their life so the fact he's put up decent numbers basically on pure stuff/his pedigree while be jerked around I believe there is a lot to tap in to with a competent pitching coach/organization.

 

Of all the rumored guys available he's probably #2 on my list behind Carrasco. I probaby would rank them in my preference 1. Carrasco 2. Gausman 3. Odorizzi/McGee 4. Miller 5. Ross

Edited by Cubswin11
Posted
Out of the rumored pitching, I think I'd go 1)Carrasco 2) Snell/McGee 3) Salazar 4) Odorizzi/McGee 5) Ross 6) Moore/McGee 7) Miller 8) Gausman 9) Teheran 10) Cobb/McGee
Posted
Is that suggesting Soler and Baez or Soler or Baez?

 

Is Gausman as an elite prospect still a thing? His numbers so far havent been terrible by any means (3.79 career FIP) but not up to his hype level and hes 24

 

He still hasn't developed a third pitch. Teach him a Cutter and a splitter and he has top of the rotation potential.

 

maybe he has a cutter and isnt' allowed to use it lol

Posted
Out of the rumored pitching, I think I'd go 1)Carrasco 2) Snell/McGee 3) Salazar 4) Odorizzi/McGee 5) Ross 6) Moore/McGee 7) Miller 8) Gausman 9) Teheran 10) Cobb/McGee

 

1. Carrasco

2. Odorizzi

3. Ross

4. Salazar

5. Teheran

6. Gausman

7. Miller

8. Cobb

9. Cashner

 

 

This is barring more elite guys being made available.

Posted

I'm trying to see how the front office is piecing this whole thing together. They're clearly trying to add another mlb pitcher through a trade, which would tell me they intend to then move Hammel to clear salary. There's probably a good chance they're going to move/non-tender Wood since that's an easy way to clear $7M. They're rumored to be offering Montero and his $14M. If they moved all three, that would clear around $30M. That would certainly clear enough to get Heyward, but would create other issues on the team. The pen would probably be fine, but would be pretty short on lefties. The starting pitching depth doesn't really improve. They would either be opening up a hole in the OF if they trade Soler or weakening the bench and becoming very reliant on Castro if they trade Baez. And they'd open up a pretty big hole at catcher unless they're confident Schwarbs is making huge strides this offseason or Contreras is ready to play at the MLB level.

 

I'm fascinated to see how all this plays out.

Posted
I'm trying to see how the front office is piecing this whole thing together. They're clearly trying to add another mlb pitcher through a trade, which would tell me they intend to then move Hammel to clear salary. There's probably a good chance they're going to move/non-tender Wood since that's an easy way to clear $7M. They're rumored to be offering Montero and his $14M. If they moved all three, that would clear around $30M. That would certainly clear enough to get Heyward, but would create other issues on the team. The pen would probably be fine, but would be pretty short on lefties. The starting pitching depth doesn't really improve. They would either be opening up a hole in the OF if they trade Soler or weakening the bench and becoming very reliant on Castro if they trade Baez. And they'd open up a pretty big hole at catcher unless they're confident Schwarbs is making huge strides this offseason or Contreras is ready to play at the MLB level.

 

I'm fascinated to see how all this plays out.

 

They do seem to be intent on trading for another young pitcher which I am on board with. Combine that with them resigning Trevor Cahill it does seem pretty clear that they are going to try and shed Hammel contract. Trading Wood or non tendering him seems like a good way to go as well. They will probably have to add a bullpen arm if they get rid of Wood but it seems like they are looking for one so I bet once they figure that out Wood is a goner. I don't see Montero being moved because we do seem to lack options if they trade him so unless they can find a reasonably priced catcher that will work for a year or two I see Montero sticking around. Getting rid of Wood and Hammel contract should be enough to make a run at Heyward or Gordon/Span if they end up trading Soler.

Posted
I'm trying to see how the front office is piecing this whole thing together. They're clearly trying to add another mlb pitcher through a trade, which would tell me they intend to then move Hammel to clear salary. There's probably a good chance they're going to move/non-tender Wood since that's an easy way to clear $7M. They're rumored to be offering Montero and his $14M. If they moved all three, that would clear around $30M. That would certainly clear enough to get Heyward, but would create other issues on the team. The pen would probably be fine, but would be pretty short on lefties. The starting pitching depth doesn't really improve. They would either be opening up a hole in the OF if they trade Soler or weakening the bench and becoming very reliant on Castro if they trade Baez. And they'd open up a pretty big hole at catcher unless they're confident Schwarbs is making huge strides this offseason or Contreras is ready to play at the MLB level.

 

I'm fascinated to see how all this plays out.

 

They do seem to be intent on trading for another young pitcher which I am on board with. Combine that with them resigning Trevor Cahill it does seem pretty clear that they are going to try and shed Hammel's contract. Trading Wood or non tendering him seems like a good way to go as well. They will probably have to add a bullpen arm if they get rid of Wood but it seems like they are looking for one so I bet once they figure that out Wood is a goner. I don't see Montero being moved because we do seem to lack options if they trade him so unless they can find a reasonably priced catcher that will work for a year or two I see Montero sticking around. Getting rid of Wood and Hammel's contract should be enough to make a run at Heyward or Gordon/Span if they end up trading Soler.

Posted

If its not hyperbole and they are actually talking to 10 teams.....1) Cleveland 2) Tampa 3) Baltimore 4) Atlanta 5) San Diego 6) Oakland(they have to at least ask on Gray 7) White Sox(Quintana 8) Miami (Have to ask there too 9) Mets( I'd guess its an option 10) Nat's (Ross?)

 

I can't think of anyone else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...