Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

Shields is a hard guy to pin down.

 

+ been a consistent performer for a long time, 4 straight seasons of at least 3.7 fWAR and 7 of 8 seasons of 3.5+ fWAR

+ very durable, 225+ IP 4 straight years, 31+ starts every year since he was in AA(2006)

+ repertoire should age gracefully(hasn't lost velocity despite his age) and is good Bosio bait(fastball, cutter, killer change, infrequent curve)

+ should see a slight bump moving away from the AL

 

- 33 at the start of next year, very dangerous to give a longer term deal to such a pitcher

- lacks truly elite ceiling, he's been a Top 20 pitcher twice and only once in the last 7 years

- has a lot of miles on his arm

 

Shields has a lot to like, but his age cuts into the big benefit of adding him(consistency/durability). I'm a lot more interested in adding him than I was a week ago, but at the same time I think he's the most likely guy to Jaxon on us of the expensive FA options.

Guest
Guests
Posted
+ if we get him we can call all of his starts big jame games

+ we can call him Big Jame Gumb

Guest
Guests
Posted

+ we can call him Big Jame Gumb

 

Then he'd have to change his uniform to #(size)12

 

was she a great big fat person?

Posted
Why don't we want Scherzer again?

 

I think he'll be the biggest ticket on the FA market this offseason. He turned down a 6-year $144 million extension. Either he thinks he can get/wants more than that on the open market or he really didn't want to stay in Detroit, but I'm guessing it's the former. And there's nothing he did this season that would make teams say he doesn't deserve that type of money.

 

He's going to cost a [expletive] load, so I'd guess cost and the fact that it seems he wants a a long term extension which this FO is not likely to offer.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Why don't we want Scherzer again?

 

I think he'll be the biggest ticket on the FA market this offseason. He turned down a 6-year $144 million extension. Either he thinks he can get/wants more than that on the open market or he really didn't want to stay in Detroit, but I'm guessing it's the former. And there's nothing he did this season that would make teams say he doesn't deserve that type of money.

 

He's going to cost a [expletive] load, so I'd guess cost and the fact that it seems he wants a a long term extension which this FO is not likely to offer.

 

 

IIRC there's been at least one report that it's the medicals.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Well, they DID trade the #1 prospect in baseball for him.
Posted
Dayton Moore came right out and said they wouldn't be active in the free agent market. Maybe he meant other guys and considered Shields a non free agent, but the feeling I get living in KC is that he's very gone.
Posted
Dayton Moore came right out and said they wouldn't be active in the free agent market. Maybe he meant other guys and considered Shields a non free agent, but the feeling I get living in KC is that he's very gone.

 

I've never heard anybody refer to trying to resign their own guys as being active in the free agent market.

Posted
They have a lot of arb increases to take care of, but they should raise payroll, and they shed 16M from Willingham, Hochevar, and Downs. It'd be tight, but they could manage.
Guest
Guests
Posted
They have a lot of arb increases to take care of, but they should raise payroll, and they shed 16M from Willingham, Hochevar, and Downs. It'd be tight, but they could manage.

 

They've only had Willingham and Downs for a couple months, I'm not sure if their salaries are indicative of the year-long threshold that Glass will want to reach payroll-wise. Maybe with the playoff money/success though.

Posted
They have a lot of arb increases to take care of, but they should raise payroll, and they shed 16M from Willingham, Hochevar, and Downs. It'd be tight, but they could manage.

 

They've only had Willingham and Downs for a couple months, I'm not sure if their salaries are indicative of the year-long threshold that Glass will want to reach payroll-wise. Maybe with the playoff money/success though.

 

Shouldn't have trusted Cots individual numbers adding up to the sum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...