Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
to imply he's not going to have a huge say in it is wrong.

 

I'm not implying it, I'm saying it.

 

Trestman will not have a huge say on the specific players brought in. His scheme will effect which way Emery goes, and in August he will be the one making decisions on whether to cut guys or not, but he won't be Bill Parcells shopping for his own groceries, a post-Super Bowl Lovie getting specific names he wants.

 

If the offensive line is going to be "reformed" it is going to have to come from personnel men making the right decisions on offensive lineman that are not currently in the organization.

 

 

did you even listen to emery's press conference? you've taken an idiotic stance and now you're married to it because of your inability to admit that you've ever been wrong.

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
the fact that jerry rice was upset that he felt he was used incorrectly doesn't mean that he was used incorrectly. i find those comments irrelevant because they are about him not liking his personal role, not the fact that the role was actually effective.

 

I just found it amusing that Marc Trestman has a website set up with a list of quotes about how great Marc Trestman is and the first name on the list is a guy who was reportedly happy when he was fired from his job coaching him.

Posted
to imply he's not going to have a huge say in it is wrong.

 

I'm not implying it, I'm saying it.

 

Trestman will not have a huge say on the specific players brought in. His scheme will effect which way Emery goes, and in August he will be the one making decisions on whether to cut guys or not, but he won't be Bill Parcells shopping for his own groceries, a post-Super Bowl Lovie getting specific names he wants.

 

If the offensive line is going to be "reformed" it is going to have to come from personnel men making the right decisions on offensive lineman that are not currently in the organization.

 

 

did you even listen to emery's press conference? you've taken an idiotic stance and now you're married to it because of your inability to admit that you've ever been wrong.

 

Really? You still want that extension for Lovie?

Posted
Where are we getting that he's not a players' coach? The Allouettes WR who spoke earlier made it sound like that's exactly what he is.
Posted
It's almost refreshing that Trestman isn't a players coach after Lovie

 

Actually, everybody seems to say that he is a players coach. This Rice/Brown situation seems to be an exception.

Posted

when did i say i wanted an extension for lovie? i supported lovie until this year when it was obvious he wasn't concerned with how the offense performed. you supported him, too.

 

i don't think i ever indicated i wanted an extension for him, though. i could be wrong.

Posted
to imply he's not going to have a huge say in it is wrong.

 

I'm not implying it, I'm saying it.

 

Trestman will not have a huge say on the specific players brought in. His scheme will effect which way Emery goes, and in August he will be the one making decisions on whether to cut guys or not, but he won't be Bill Parcells shopping for his own groceries, a post-Super Bowl Lovie getting specific names he wants.

 

If the offensive line is going to be "reformed" it is going to have to come from personnel men making the right decisions on offensive lineman that are not currently in the organization.

 

 

did you even listen to emery's press conference? you've taken an idiotic stance and now you're married to it because of your inability to admit that you've ever been wrong.

 

Really? You still want that extension for Lovie?

 

I think you're holding onto that a bit too much. We don't have any idea how serious that ever was. The "source" on that was Terry Boers, who is far from an iron clad source.

Posted

The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

Posted
The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

 

he's going to cut or otherwise release several players, i'm sure. he'll bring in guys that fit his system or whom he feels are better than what he has. i don't know what is so hard to understand about that.

Posted

I think you're holding onto that a bit too much. We don't have any idea how serious that ever was. The "source" on that was Terry Boers, who is far from an iron clad source.

 

Holding on to what? I'm not talking about reports of an extension from the media. I'm talking about the discussion on here in reaction to those reports.

Posted

Emery is an info junkie. He'll pick Treatman's brain about players and get tons of feedback. When its decision time, it will be Emery's to make. But Emery will obviously be influenced after picking his brain, just as he will be influenced by scouts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I think you're holding onto that a bit too much. We don't have any idea how serious that ever was. The "source" on that was Terry Boers, who is far from an iron clad source.

 

Holding on to what? I'm not talking about reports of an extension from the media. I'm talking about the discussion on here in reaction to those reports.

 

Ah, ok.

Posted
The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

 

he's going to cut or otherwise release several players, i'm sure. he'll bring in guys that fit his system or whom he feels are better than what he has. i don't know what is so hard to understand about that.

 

He won't be the one bringing them in. That is the point.

Posted
The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

 

and emery's soliloquy about "synergy" means that a lot of people will have input. not just the "personnel guys". that includes the head coach, whom he said will have a lot of input into the personnel. again, did you not hear the emery pc?

Posted

There have been a ton of head coaches in the NFL who came in without exposure to top football talent for long periods of time.

 

Who? NFL coaches are either assistant NFL coaches or coaches of very good major college teams, who are very good because they have NFL caliber talent moving on to the next level.

... With the vast majority of those rosters not good enough to play professionally, let alone in the NFL. And the vast majority of opponent rosters.

 

You've taken an obtuse stance you're now forced to defend based on selectively reading quotes from Emery.

Posted
The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

 

he's going to cut or otherwise release several players, i'm sure. he'll bring in guys that fit his system or whom he feels are better than what he has. i don't know what is so hard to understand about that.

 

He won't be the one bringing them in. That is the point.

 

he won't be the only one bringing them in. your argument has now morphed into a rigid "only personnel guys make personnel decisions." to support your original thesis. i don't know why you paint yourself into corners like that.

Posted

There have been a ton of head coaches in the NFL who came in without exposure to top football talent for long periods of time.

 

Who? NFL coaches are either assistant NFL coaches or coaches of very good major college teams, who are very good because they have NFL caliber talent moving on to the next level.

... With the vast majority of those rosters not good enough to play professionally, let alone in the NFL. And the vast majority of opponent rosters.

 

You've taken an obtuse stance you're now forced to defend based on selectively reading quotes from Emery.

 

I've taken the only rational stance. Emery is the personnel man tasked with bringing in the talent. NFL coach/GM relationships vary from team to team, with some GMs being de facto assistants to the head coach. That is not the case with the Bears.

Posted
Good thought on twitter, wondering if Marinelli is wavering on the off chance that Lovie gets a HC job somewhere, so he can follow him.
Posted
The point is the offensive line has to be fixed with personnel decisions made by personnel guys. Trestman won't fix it. Personnel decisions will fix it.

 

Montreal media members talking about how Trestman is going to "reform" the offensive line are not saying anything meaningful.

 

he's going to cut or otherwise release several players, i'm sure. he'll bring in guys that fit his system or whom he feels are better than what he has. i don't know what is so hard to understand about that.

 

He won't be the one bringing them in. That is the point.

 

he won't be the only one bringing them in. your argument has now morphed into a rigid "only personnel guys make personnel decisions." to support your original thesis. i don't know why you paint yourself into corners like that.

 

If you want to describe it as a corner, whatever. I'm very comfortable standing by what I've said on the matter.

 

Trestman won't be the one we'll be counting on to "reform" the offensive line. Emery is.

Posted
While Kromer may have struggled this season as interim coach, but Kromer has helped mold the Saints offensive line into one of the best units in the last several seasons.

 

Under Kromer's watch, the Saints have had someone from every offensive line position earn a Pro Bowl spot: left tackle Jermon Bushrod, left guard Carl Nicks, center Jonathan Goodwin, right guard Jahri Evans and right tackle Jon Stinchcomb. Evans and Nicks also became the first guard tandem ever to earn first-team All-Pro honors.

Posted
Good thought on twitter, wondering if Marinelli is wavering on the off chance that Lovie gets a HC job somewhere, so he can follow him.

Wasn't he reluctant to become the DC in the first place? I could even see him becoming a D-line coach if Lovie becomes a DC.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...