Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
According to MLBTR, Barton has been non tendered. If Fielder doesn't happen I'd be willing to revisit to possibility through trade.

 

For clarification, Barton has been tendered a contract. He is not a FA.

 

Yes, I know. I mistakenly wrote non tendered instead of tendered. Otherwise I wouldn't have suggested the possibility of trading for him. The shame I feel is far greater than anything you can say or do.

 

And when I read it I assumed you had a brain fart and thought non-tendering was the same thing as DFA. If you don't want people to clarify your mistakes, edit them yourself.

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
According to MLBTR, Barton has been non tendered. If Fielder doesn't happen I'd be willing to revisit to possibility through trade.

 

For clarification, Barton has been tendered a contract. He is not a FA.

 

Yes, I know. I mistakenly wrote non tendered instead of tendered. Otherwise I wouldn't have suggested the possibility of trading for him. The shame I feel is far greater than anything you can say or do.

 

And when I read it I assumed you had a brain fart and thought non-tendering was the same thing as DFA. If you don't want people to clarify your mistakes, edit them yourself.

 

If I catch them, I edit them. If someone beats me to it, that's OK too.

Posted
Joe Saunders was Non-tendered by the Diamondbacks. I can't say that I know much about him. Is he the type of pitcher the Cubs would be looking to sign?
Posted
Non of these arguements give any reason not to try to buy low on Loney if Fielder isn't an option.

 

You're right. If Fielder signs elsewhere, Loney wouldn't be terrible compared to some of the other options. Which you should read as: signing Fielder is pretty damn imperative.

Posted
Joe Saunders was Non-tendered by the Diamondbacks. I can't say that I know much about him. Is he the type of pitcher the Cubs would be looking to sign?

Not likely. He pretty much sucks.

Posted

My excitement to see Ryan Theriot taken down a peg is somewhat offset by the fact the Cardinals can now spend that elsewhere.

 

Oh, what's that you say? They gave Skip Schumaker 2 years? Huzzah!

Posted
If Andrew Miller gets non-tendered, he fits the Epstein profile.

 

He re-upped for 1 year with Boston last week.

Strange. It was in an article on the front page of mlb.com yesterday. Must've been an older article, I guess. Thanks.

Posted
So in the end, it looks like the only interesting non tenders are Pete Moyland(I've always had an odd obsession with side armers), Micah Owings, who'd be a better 6th starter/swingman than Casey Coleman or Rodrigo Lopez, Joe Sanders if we needed another 5th starter option, and Ryan Spillborghs who'd be a better 4th outfielder than Montanez. Nothing I'd go out of my way to jump on but at the right price, why not.
Posted

What's the interest in Joe Saunders about? I've seen his name pop up on multiple occasions and never understood why anybody would be interested in him.

 

He'll be 31 next year, has had two seasons with an ERA under 4.00, and never had an xFIP under 4.38 in a full season. He doesn't walk a lot of batters (2.87 BB/9), but he also doesn't strike anybody out (5.02 K/9). He is a lefty though, so I guess there's that.

 

Can't say I have any interest in him or Owings.

Posted
What's the interest in Joe Saunders about? I've seen his name pop up on multiple occasions and never understood why anybody would be interested in him.

 

He'll be 31 next year, has had two seasons with an ERA under 4.00, and never had an xFIP under 4.38 in a full season. He doesn't walk a lot of batters (2.87 BB/9), but he also doesn't strike anybody out (5.02 K/9). He is a lefty though, so I guess there's that.

 

Can't say I have any interest in him or Owings.

 

I'd guess the interest is based on being able to throw lots of non-horrible innings. He's been about a 1.2 - 1.5 WAR pitcher for several years, with 190 - 210 IP. Basically a little better than Jason Marquis was when they signed him.

Posted
Saunders is fine if he was appropriately valued, but he made 5.5M last year, and after a sub-4 ERA last year, I don't expect his salary to drop much in free agency.

 

I guess even if Saunders came cheap I see a lot of better options out there who can be had cheaply and are young enough to potentially get better. I see Saunders' name pop up on here often enough that I keep thinking I'm missing something, though. But I just keep seeing an old pitcher who doesn't walk guys or strike anybody out and has been pretty unproductive.

Posted
I'd guess the interest is based on being able to throw lots of non-horrible innings. He's been about a 1.2 - 1.5 WAR pitcher for several years, with 190 - 210 IP. Basically a little better than Jason Marquis was when they signed him.

 

Hadn't considered the Marquis comparison - it's a pretty good comp. I wouldn't be angry if the Cubs signed him or anything (unless he cost us actual money), but it seems like I've seen him mentioned more often than a mediocre innings-eater should be. Maybe I'm overblowing it, though.

Posted
I'd guess the interest is based on being able to throw lots of non-horrible innings. He's been about a 1.2 - 1.5 WAR pitcher for several years, with 190 - 210 IP. Basically a little better than Jason Marquis was when they signed him.

 

Hadn't considered the Marquis comparison - it's a pretty good comp. I wouldn't be angry if the Cubs signed him or anything (unless he cost us actual money), but it seems like I've seen him mentioned more often than a mediocre innings-eater should be. Maybe I'm overblowing it, though.

 

Seems like a guy who is worth $4-5m, especially for a decent offensive team. But if you are running out there with the pathetic group the Cubs currently have, there's not much point in paying for mediocre pitching.

Posted
I'm all about Owings for cheap. He would be a great swing man and could also function as a decent PH option in the early innings when a starter is getting rocked or in extra innings as your long guy who you don't have to pinch hit for. He's a decent pitcher, but his offensive value could be very key. Of course, things like that matter more on a certain contender, but if we are in a division race, a guy like that is important.
Posted
Seems like a guy who is worth $4-5m, especially for a decent offensive team. But if you are running out there with the pathetic group the Cubs currently have, there's not much point in paying for mediocre pitching.

 

I can see that.

Posted
Racist or not, Scott hits lefties to the tune of .268/.357/.501/.858 and Soriano righties at .286/.349/.533/.883 and so between them both, you see they licked the platter clean.

 

That's fair and Scott does make some sense for us to sign. But this is one of the few times that I'm going to look at someone's personality instead of their stats. As Banedon said, I just really want to punch him in the face and would not enjoy watching him have success.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...