Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
http://www.firekite.com/store/misc/pics/forum13/retard2.jpg

Thanks.

 

I should have put this in rants though.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

It's late June. The fact is, they *ARE* keeping it up. And they're getting Pujols back soon, as well as possibly Carpenter/Mulder. There's reason to be hopeful in St. Louis, that's all I'm really saying. Wellemeyer is also apparently getting close to returning, though they need to be careful with his arm since he's never pitched this much.

 

I'm also looking at the NL standings -- the reality is even if the Cards don't win the division they could very well get into the playoffs as the WC because it's looking like the 2nd place NL Central team will be better than the 2nd place team from the East (the West being out of the question barring some miracle). We could be seeing this Cardinals team in the playoffs. A NLCS between the Cubs/Cards would be bombastic on a level I don't think I've ever seen.

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

just like they did last year.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
they're only 3 games ahead of their Pythag. They aren't lucky

 

Actually, 3 above Pythag is the second largest difference in the majors, behind the Angels, so...actually, they are lucky. Adjusted Standings

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

Considering Weaver's performances before and after his time with the Cardinals, Duncan should goto the HOF on that alone.

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

Considering Weaver's performances before and after his time with the Cardinals, Duncan should goto the HOF on that alone.

because he had a good run in the playoffs? he was terrible in the regular season with them

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

Considering Weaver's performances before and after his time with the Cardinals, Duncan should goto the HOF on that alone.

because he had a good run in the playoffs? he was terrible in the regular season with them

 

THANK YOU

 

Ohh wahhh Jeff Weaver had a good 4 start run with the Cardinals, it's not fair.

 

Personally, I think it'll be great if Mark Mulder comes back for the Cards this year. Is this really what we've come to fretting about? The dried up husk of Mark Mulder's career? I think Truffle was the one who mentioned it before, but if I'm looking at the realistic wild card possibilites, I'm definitely pulling for the Cardinals to get it so that we have a not very good team in the playoffs as a potential opponent.

Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

Considering Weaver's performances before and after his time with the Cardinals, Duncan should goto the HOF on that alone.

 

I'm so glad Scott Boras (Weaver's agent) crashed and burned with that deal.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well, what was the Cards' preseason rating? I'm sure they are far outpacing that at the moment.

 

To go into Boston and beat the Red Sox 2/3 doesn't really suggest luck though. It suggests a lot of experts were wrong about them. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.

 

I'm glad to have built up a 4.5 game cushion on them, but I'm starting to doubt that they'll fade away more than I doubt they are a good team.

 

The performance of Ludwick, Schumaker and Miles notwithstanding the key point is they're not pitchers, barring any trades the St. Louis staff is going to be their undoing. The bullpen is currently 24 of 30 in ERA, we've seen some of it and its not good, the starters are 9 of 30 in ERA - with the likes of Looper, Lohse, Piniero and Mitchell Boggs (who is 2-0 despite issuing more BB's than K's along with more hits than IP and 3 HR's in 16.1 IP!) - do you really believe this group is going to keep this up?

They made Jeff Weaver into a stud. They can and will keep it up.

 

Considering Weaver's performances before and after his time with the Cardinals, Duncan should goto the HOF on that alone.

because he had a good run in the playoffs? he was terrible in the regular season with them

 

THANK YOU

 

Ohh wahhh Jeff Weaver had a good 4 start run with the Cardinals, it's not fair.

 

Personally, I think it'll be great if Mark Mulder comes back for the Cards this year. Is this really what we've come to fretting about? The dried up husk of Mark Mulder's career? I think Truffle was the one who mentioned it before, but if I'm looking at the realistic wild card possibilites, I'm definitely pulling for the Cardinals to get it so that we have a not very good team in the playoffs as a potential opponent.

 

That would be fine with me as well. I'm definitely fretting about the Cards still playing good without Pujols. They get him back fairly soon. Mulder's been bad in his rehab assignments, we'll see if he has anything left. Wellemeyer is coming back too -- though I fear for the kid's arm and LaRussa doesn't really seem to care, so he might fall off a cliff.

 

If we take this division by 10+ games like abuck seems to think then obviously that would be great. My main point is, it's not wise to underestimate your opponents, whether that be the Cards or the Crew.

Posted
they're only 3 games ahead of their Pythag. They aren't lucky

 

Actually, 3 above Pythag is the second largest difference in the majors, behind the Angels, so...actually, they are lucky. Adjusted Standings

 

relative to the league, sure. but they aren't 2007 D-Backs lucky

Old-Timey Member
Posted
they're only 3 games ahead of their Pythag. They aren't lucky

 

Actually, 3 above Pythag is the second largest difference in the majors, behind the Angels, so...actually, they are lucky. Adjusted Standings

 

relative to the league, sure. but they aren't 2007 D-Backs lucky

 

True. Incidentally, it's kind of fun to watch the DBacks finally get back to being the team that they really are. Took nearly a calendar year for it to happen though.

Posted

None of the other potential wild card teams are better then the Cardinals. None. I know it hurts to see that, but it's the truth. When they are healthy, they have a 1-2 of Wainwright and Carpenter, they have Pujols, Ankiel (not great, but a lot of power), Ludwick (maybe fluky, but he always had a lot of potential for power. Look at his 90% mark on PECOTA), Glaus (Heating up, not great, has power), and probably Rasmus before September.

 

That's better then the Brewers, Mets, Dodgers, Marlins, Braves, etc...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
None of the other potential wild card teams are better then the Cardinals. None. I know it hurts to see that, but it's the truth. When they are healthy, they have a 1-2 of Wainwright and Carpenter, they have Pujols, Ankiel (not great, but a lot of power), Ludwick (maybe fluky, but he always had a lot of potential for power. Look at his 90% mark on PECOTA), Glaus (Heating up, not great, has power), and probably Rasmus before September.

 

That's better then the Brewers, Mets, Dodgers, Marlins, Braves, etc...

 

I still think the Crew are a better ballclub, and will prove that by the end of the year.

 

However, I agree that nobody else in the NL has as good a shot at the WC as the 2nd place NL Central team. Certainly the WC won't be coming from the West. And none of those NL East teams impress me, though I guess one of them could make a run. As it stands right now, I expect 2 playoff teams from the NL Central.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...