Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 837
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Dempster looks good again.

 

I don't know how he's doing it, but again, I'm just going to go with it.

I'm guessing a quality Norelco razor and an old-fashioned comb.

Posted
I know some people might disagree, but I like the bunt here. Sure, you may cost yourself an out, but getting on the scoreboard first is that important.

It is pretty important. That's why you don't lower your chances of doing it by bunting.

 

I would actually say that you raise your chances of scoring by bunting him to third there. If you got a guy that hits .300, there's a 70% chance he's getting out. Might as well make the out productive by moving the runner over to third, where an out, which again is 70% likely, can still score the runner.

 

Given, I realize this entire discussion is based upon odds and an individual's baseball theory prefernce.

Posted
I know some people might disagree, but I like the bunt here. Sure, you may cost yourself an out, but getting on the scoreboard first is that important.

It is pretty important. That's why you don't lower your chances of doing it by bunting.

 

I would actually say that you raise your chances of scoring by bunting him to third there. If you got a guy that hits .300, there's a 70% chance he's getting out. Might as well make the out productive by moving the runner over to third, where an out, which again is 70% likely, can still score the runner.

 

Given, I realize this entire discussion is based upon odds and an individual's baseball theory prefernce.

 

First, there's not a 70% chance of him getting out. And there's a less than 100% chance that an out will score the runner (only two specific types of outs will, deep fly balls and groundouts not right at a corner infielder).

 

People have already crunched the odds for you. You are more likely to score a run with a runner on 2nd and no outs than a runner on 3rd and one out. That's not really debatable.

Posted
I know some people might disagree, but I like the bunt here. Sure, you may cost yourself an out, but getting on the scoreboard first is that important.

It is pretty important. That's why you don't lower your chances of doing it by bunting.

 

I would actually say that you raise your chances of scoring by bunting him to third there. If you got a guy that hits .300, there's a 70% chance he's getting out. Might as well make the out productive by moving the runner over to third, where an out, which again is 70% likely, can still score the runner.

 

Given, I realize this entire discussion is based upon odds and an individual's baseball theory prefernce.

 

You're going with conventional thinking, which is against conventional thinking on this board. So, are you being original in your thinking or not. I'm confused.

Posted
Soto does not like Zach Duke, apparently.

He only missed his head because he felt a last second bit of mercy.

 

Soto also has infinite mercy as well as infinite awesomeness.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...