Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
i didn't realize that the old D-Rays GM was now running the Rangers

 

Hes now director of professional scouting for the Phillies.

 

But I know you were making a joke.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

This isn't good news.

 

Link.

 

But, a club source indicated that the Cubs have recently re-engaged the Rangers because Hendry hasn't been able to land the extra outfielder he has been seeking.

 

"I made the decision to wait until spring training to get an outfielder who could play all three positions," Hendry said. "Now, it's time for me to get something done. I'd feel better about my contributions to the club if I could get something done this spring.

 

The Rangers have held firm on wanting one of the Cubs' top three pitching prospects, either Jose Ceda, Sean Gallagher or Donald Veal in addition to Murton.

 

Don't say no, Jim. Say Hell No!

Posted
Why does this team continue to insist on putting itself in unnecessarily unfavorable positions with self inflicted mandates? This team doesn't need a backup OF who can play all 3 positions and bat RH by opening day. It just doesn't.
Posted
Why does this team continue to insist on putting itself in unnecessarily unfavorable positions with self inflicted mandates? This team doesn't need a backup OF who can play all 3 positions and bat RH by opening day. It just doesn't.

 

on some cases they have ridiculous self-inflicted mandatets, in others they let trades drag on for the better part of four months.

Posted
The Rangers have held firm on wanting one of the Cubs' top three pitching prospects, either Jose Ceda, Sean Gallagher or Donald Veal in addition to Murton.

we are still talking about Marlon Byrd, right? Murton alone would be too steep of a price

Posted
Why does this team continue to insist on putting itself in unnecessarily unfavorable positions with self inflicted mandates? This team doesn't need a backup OF who can play all 3 positions and bat RH by opening day. It just doesn't.

 

on some cases they have ridiculous self-inflicted mandatets, in others they let trades drag on for the better part of four months.

I think you (by that I don't necessarily mean you specifically, but fans/news media) have let it drag on. My thinking the Cubs made an offer and left it on the table. The rest is mental tantric masturbation by fans and the media.

Posted
Why does this team continue to insist on putting itself in unnecessarily unfavorable positions with self inflicted mandates? This team doesn't need a backup OF who can play all 3 positions and bat RH by opening day. It just doesn't.

 

on some cases they have ridiculous self-inflicted mandatets, in others they let trades drag on for the better part of four months.

I think you (by that I don't necessarily mean you specifically, but fans/news media) have let it drag on. My thinking the Cubs made an offer and left it on the table. The rest is mental masturbation by fans and the media.

 

You'd have to be a complete moron to leave an offer on the table that long.

Posted
Why does this team continue to insist on putting itself in unnecessarily unfavorable positions with self inflicted mandates? This team doesn't need a backup OF who can play all 3 positions and bat RH by opening day. It just doesn't.

 

on some cases they have ridiculous self-inflicted mandatets, in others they let trades drag on for the better part of four months.

I think you (by that I don't necessarily mean you specifically, but fans/news media) have let it drag on. My thinking the Cubs made an offer and left it on the table. The rest is mental masturbation by fans and the media.

 

You'd have to be a complete moron to leave an offer on the table that long.

And why is that? It's not like any of those players are going anywhere unless a trade is done. I fault Hendry for a lot of things, trying his best to make a trade isn't one of them.

Posted

And why is that? It's not like any of those players are going anywhere unless a trade is done. I fault Hendry for a lot of things, trying his best to make a trade isn't one of them.

 

Negotiation 101. If Hendry made an offer 3 months ago and kept it on the table, he's a bigger moron that I thought.

Posted

And why is that? It's not like any of those players are going anywhere unless a trade is done. I fault Hendry for a lot of things, trying his best to make a trade isn't one of them.

 

Negotiation 101. If Hendry made an offer 3 months ago and kept it on the table, he's a bigger moron that I thought.

That's just a ridiculous statement. How does it hurt? In what way does it negatively impact a team in Spring Training? This isn't some team sport where a wide receiver and QB have to get their timing down.

 

Hendry could have left the offer on the table and still attempted to make other deals. If one of the players is included in another deal, so what?

 

I'm not trying to defend Hendry here, I don't see the point of trading for Roberts. But the idea that Hendry is somehow being played as a sucker is just testosterone filled foolishness.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

And why is that? It's not like any of those players are going anywhere unless a trade is done. I fault Hendry for a lot of things, trying his best to make a trade isn't one of them.

 

Negotiation 101. If Hendry made an offer 3 months ago and kept it on the table, he's a bigger moron that I thought.

 

Yeah, but once again, I don't think we really know that sort of thing. We're just hearing media jabber, it doesn't necessarily match up with the details of what happened behind the scenes.

Community Moderator
Posted

What happened to Jeff Davanon and Reed Johnson? These guys don't require the Cubs to give up anyone to get them. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than overpaying for Byrd. Not to mention the fact that there will be a bunch more guys available through waivers in the next week or so.

 

Part of me wishes the Cubs would have gone after Cameron now, but Cameron definitely would have cut into Pie's development once his suspension was over.

 

At least if they picked up Cameron, they wouldn't have this urge to overpay for someone who isn't good enough to hold Cameron's jockstrap.

 

Why is Hendry even thinking of trading Murton anyway? Fukudome just had surgery and missed the remainder of the 2007 season in Japan. Soriano has been struggling with quad problems. There is no guarantee that either of them will stay healthy all year, so Murton provides nice protection in the event of an injury.

 

Hendry just pisses me off with these boneheaded ideas. "It's too bad Murton isn't left handed" and "It's too bad Murton can't play CF" are just a couple of examples of the boneheadedness of the Cubs GM. You know what I say to that? "It's too bad that Hendry is STILL the GM of this team".

 

Just grab DaVanon and call it a day, Hendry, you moron.

Posted
What happened to Jeff Davanon and Reed Johnson? These guys don't require the Cubs to give up anyone to get them. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than overpaying for Byrd. Not to mention the fact that there will be a bunch more guys available through waivers in the next week or so.

 

Part of me wishes the Cubs would have gone after Cameron now, but Cameron definitely would have cut into Pie's development once his suspension was over.

 

At least if they picked up Cameron, they wouldn't have this urge to overpay for someone who isn't good enough to hold Cameron's jockstrap.

 

Why is Hendry even thinking of trading Murton anyway? Fukudome just had surgery and missed the remainder of the 2007 season in Japan. Soriano has been struggling with quad problems. There is no guarantee that either of them will stay healthy all year, so Murton provides nice protection in the event of an injury.

 

Hendry just pisses me off with these boneheaded ideas. "It's too bad Murton isn't left handed" and "It's too bad Murton can't play CF" are just a couple of examples of the boneheadedness of the Cubs GM. You know what I say to that? "It's too bad that Hendry is STILL the GM of this team".

 

Just grab DaVanon and call it a day, Hendry, you moron.

 

My guess is Hendry still prefers Byrd to DaVannon or Johnson. So, he's willing to deal Murton to get him. (Personally, I'd rather have both Murton and Johnson.) Because of this, he probably called Daniels back one more time to see if he were any more reasonable than the last time. It appears that Daniels is overplaying the career year of Byrd.

Posted

And why is that? It's not like any of those players are going anywhere unless a trade is done. I fault Hendry for a lot of things, trying his best to make a trade isn't one of them.

 

Negotiation 101. If Hendry made an offer 3 months ago and kept it on the table, he's a bigger moron that I thought.

 

Yeah, but once again, I don't think we really know that sort of thing. We're just hearing media jabber, it doesn't necessarily match up with the details of what happened behind the scenes.

 

Well I'm not the one who said this is what happened. Cubinny seems to think all the Roberts talk is fan/media nonsense, and that Hendry made one offer a few months ago and left it on the table. I'm saying I doubt that is the case because it would be incredibly stupid.

Posted
What happened to Jeff Davanon and Reed Johnson? These guys don't require the Cubs to give up anyone to get them. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than overpaying for Byrd. Not to mention the fact that there will be a bunch more guys available through waivers in the next week or so.

 

Part of me wishes the Cubs would have gone after Cameron now, but Cameron definitely would have cut into Pie's development once his suspension was over.

 

At least if they picked up Cameron, they wouldn't have this urge to overpay for someone who isn't good enough to hold Cameron's jockstrap.

 

Why is Hendry even thinking of trading Murton anyway? Fukudome just had surgery and missed the remainder of the 2007 season in Japan. Soriano has been struggling with quad problems. There is no guarantee that either of them will stay healthy all year, so Murton provides nice protection in the event of an injury.

 

Hendry just pisses me off with these boneheaded ideas. "It's too bad Murton isn't left handed" and "It's too bad Murton can't play CF" are just a couple of examples of the boneheadedness of the Cubs GM. You know what I say to that? "It's too bad that Hendry is STILL the GM of this team".

 

Just grab DaVanon and call it a day, Hendry, you moron.

 

My guess is Hendry still prefers Byrd to DaVannon or Johnson. So, he's willing to deal Murton to get him. (Personally, I'd rather have both Murton and Johnson.) Because of this, he probably called Daniels back one more time to see if he were any more reasonable than the last time. It appears that Daniels is overplaying the career year of Byrd.

 

That's my guess too. I don't think JH is worried about a platoon as much as he's worried about Pie sucking. He wants someone who can platoon, but also step in full-time if Lou & Hendry deem Pie too sucky to play every day. Jim probably sees Byrd as that kind of player, but not Davanon or Johnson.

Posted

I think it is wonderful that the Cubs have TWO corner OFers who CAN play CF, but we have two pretty decent corner OFers on the bench (Murton, Hoff) who can't fit in on this team because they CAN'T play CF.

 

Of course, Pie and Patterson are pretty decent options in CF - but since nobody is going to work, the Cubs have FIVE OFers who just seem to be square pegs....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...