Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Do you realize that even if the Cubs won their next 17 straight games, it would get them to .500 and if the Dodgers and Reds played .500 baseball over that time, they would still be 2 games ahead of the Cubs in the Wild Card.

 

The moral of the story: 9.5 games out can be deceptive.

Posted
Do you realize that even if the Cubs won their next 17 straight games, it would get them to .500 and if the Dodgers and Reds played .500 baseball over that time, they would still be 2 games ahead of the Cubs in the Wild Card.

 

The moral of the story: 9.5 games out can be deceptive.

 

So you're SAYIN THERE'S A CHANCE!!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Do you realize that even if the Cubs won their next 17 straight games, it would get them to .500 and if the Dodgers and Reds played .500 baseball over that time, they would still be 2 games ahead of the Cubs in the Wild Card.

 

The moral of the story: 9.5 games out can be deceptive.

 

So you're SAYIN THERE'S A CHANCE!!

 

I was just going to write that! LOL! Cubs fans grasp onto to any little thread they could find. I find myself checking the standings every morning...

Posted

Dear Dusty Jr's in this thread,

 

There are no '06 playoffs in the Cubs future. Let's not be delusional. Do we really want to focus on getting back to 5 games below .500, or do we want to thoroughly evaluate what we have for next season? Do we want to continue skipping the 5th spot in the rotation when able, or do we want to utilize the 5th spot to further evaluate a young arm?

 

We need to be working towards next season. Thanks.

Posted
i would, in this case, remind everyone of the andy MacPhail rule: multiply the number of games behind you are by the number of teams ahead of you to get a true value of "games behind".
Posted
Dear Dusty Jr's in this thread,

 

There are no '06 playoffs in the Cubs future. Let's not be delusional. Do we really want to focus on getting back to 5 games below .500, or do we want to thoroughly evaluate what we have for next season? Do we want to continue skipping the 5th spot in the rotation when able, or do we want to utilize the 5th spot to further evaluate a young arm?

 

We need to be working towards next season. Thanks.

 

Nobody said we wanted to try to win at the expense of the young players. If we can continue winning like we have been lately though with many of the young players playing, isn't that the best thing? That means the young players will be playing very well, as players like Hill has done for us lately. Besides, it's more likely that skipping the 5th starter will give an extra start to a rookie at the end of the season as it will be to a veteran (when Marshall comes back we will have 3 rookies in the rotation, and so a 60 percent chance that the extra start it frees up will be given to one of Marshall, Marmol, or Hill). The problems with skipping the 5th starter have to do with 2 things-the stress on a player like Zambrano's arm, which I'm not sure about-and giving Mateo regular work instead of sitting him for 2 weeks and than sending him down, and I am one who sincerely hopes he at least puts in a couple appearances if not more in the next week and a half. Basically, I want us to prepare for next year, but if we can continue winning while we do that than that is just a huge bonus for me.

Posted
i would, in this case, remind everyone of the andy MacPhail rule: multiply the number of games behind you are by the number of teams ahead of you to get a true value of "games behind".

 

104.5. yes! hurry back d. lee - the mathematics don't have us out yet!

Posted

This is why the seats will still be packed for the next month. this little run has made people think there's a chance... and Dusty and company won't stop saying so to anyone who'll print what they say...

 

We're doomed for more than this year, folks...

Guest
Guests
Posted

We've been playing the kids more (starting pitching, at least, with Hill, Marmol & Mateo starting lately) and we've been winning more.

 

Dusty, are you paying attention?

Posted
We've been playing the kids more (starting pitching, at least, with Hill, Marmol & Mateo starting lately) and we've been winning more.

 

Dusty, are you paying attention?

 

Of course he is! Who do you think is putting them in position to succeed?

Posted
We've been playing the kids more (starting pitching, at least, with Hill, Marmol & Mateo starting lately) and we've been winning more.

 

Dusty, are you paying attention?

 

Good point. I was also thinking that Izturis' arrival has forced Cedeo to second and Neifi to the bench. This is a good thing.

Posted
We've been playing the kids more (starting pitching, at least, with Hill, Marmol & Mateo starting lately) and we've been winning more.

 

Dusty, are you paying attention?

 

We've had better offense than we've had pitching lately-I think they still said that our ERA was over 5 on the homestand on Sunday, but things like Hill pitching instead of Rusch have meant a couple game difference, that's for sure. It's amazing when the offense can do to a ballclub when they have 4 hot players/positions (Ramirez, Barrett, Pierre, Murton/Pagan in LF)

Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.
Community Moderator
Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.

 

There was a link posted to a site that tracks that day to day, and frankly I don't remember it now...I'm sure someone can repost it. And just to provide a bit of counterpoint, sure there are going to be some guaranteed winners, but there will also be some guaranteed losers...

 

Please note...I do not think we're still in contention...just thought it beared noting.

Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.

 

FWIW:

 

 

  • NL Central W L Pct3 Avg W Avg L Champions Wild Card Playoffs
    Cardinals 61 50 .475 86.9 75.1 73.03671 8.68237 81.71908
    Reds 57 55 .481 82.3 79.7 20.19954 16.14856 36.34810
    Astros 53 58 .462 78.2 83.8 4.55633 4.18596 8.74229
    Brewers 52 59 .452 76.7 85.3 2.13132 2.08386 4.21517
    Cubs 47 64 .443 70.9 91.1 .07583 .06619 .14202

 

The Cubs elimination number for the division is 38, it's 42 for the wild card.

Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.

 

FWIW:

 

 

  • NL Central W L Pct3 Avg W Avg L Champions Wild Card Playoffs
    Cardinals 61 50 .475 86.9 75.1 73.03671 8.68237 81.71908
    Reds 57 55 .481 82.3 79.7 20.19954 16.14856 36.34810
    Astros 53 58 .462 78.2 83.8 4.55633 4.18596 8.74229
    Brewers 52 59 .452 76.7 85.3 2.13132 2.08386 4.21517
    Cubs 47 64 .443 70.9 91.1 .07583 .06619 .14202

 

The Cubs elimination number for the division is 38, it's 42 for the wild card.

 

.14202%. Those are betting odds. :P

Community Moderator
Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.

 

FWIW:

 

 

  • NL Central W L Pct3 Avg W Avg L Champions Wild Card Playoffs
    Cardinals 61 50 .475 86.9 75.1 73.03671 8.68237 81.71908
    Reds 57 55 .481 82.3 79.7 20.19954 16.14856 36.34810
    Astros 53 58 .462 78.2 83.8 4.55633 4.18596 8.74229
    Brewers 52 59 .452 76.7 85.3 2.13132 2.08386 4.21517
    Cubs 47 64 .443 70.9 91.1 .07583 .06619 .14202

 

The Cubs elimination number for the division is 38, it's 42 for the wild card.

 

.14202%. Those are betting odds. :P

 

We've got action!

Posted
Just so everybody understands, a bunch of the teams ahead of us are going to be playing each other the rest of the season, meaning there are many guaranteed wins for teams not named the Cubs. This is why we were basically eliminated by the all-star break. Someone with some time and math skills should check to see the date it becomes mathematically impossible to slide into contention.

 

FWIW:

 

 

  • NL Central W L Pct3 Avg W Avg L Champions Wild Card Playoffs
    Cardinals 61 50 .475 86.9 75.1 73.03671 8.68237 81.71908
    Reds 57 55 .481 82.3 79.7 20.19954 16.14856 36.34810
    Astros 53 58 .462 78.2 83.8 4.55633 4.18596 8.74229
    Brewers 52 59 .452 76.7 85.3 2.13132 2.08386 4.21517
    Cubs 47 64 .443 70.9 91.1 .07583 .06619 .14202

 

The Cubs elimination number for the division is 38, it's 42 for the wild card.

 

.14202%. Those are betting odds. :P

 

We've got action!

 

Someone loan me a dollar! Its like that line Back to the Future II: "Wish I could go back to the beginning of the season and put some money on the Cubbies!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...