Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted

I assume they're done but moving Rea and/or moving Alcantara for his weight in optionable reliever would be nice things to get in under the buzzer

  • Replies 580
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Ayers made Mo expendable . I don't really understand trading Rojas for Holmes but not Soriano?

Posted
1 minute ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

This is probably the main reason Jed was willing to do it.

Has to be - I agree

Old-Timey Member
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Brewers add Senzatela who has been solid out of the pen this year. That brings their trade deadline total to 

SP; May

RP: Senzatela and Romero

Catcher: Naylor

A solid deadline, but I really feel like they should have done a lot more

They should have gone for Skubal.

Posted

The Marlins are far from some model organization, but there has to be some reason why he hasn't been called up all year. Their fifth starter is a 28 year old with a K/9 in the 5s. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Stratos said:

It's not like a reliever with lots of Ks and walks is super rare.  Heck we DFA'd Estrada when he lost his release point for just a season when normally it was ok.  A catcher who can hit like Mo is rare.

Again. I think the Cubs just told you today he's not a catcher. Not to them. Not anymore. 

A DH who can hit like Mo isn't very rare.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Brewers add Senzatela who has been solid out of the pen this year. That brings their trade deadline total to 

SP; May

RP: Senzatela and Romero

Catcher: Naylor

A solid deadline, but I really feel like they should have done a lot more

Yeah I thought they might be more aggressive this season. I'm happy they didn't get Skubal

Posted
Just now, squally1313 said:

The Marlins are far from some model organization, but there has to be some reason why he hasn't been called up all year. Their fifth starter is a 28 year old with a K/9 in the 5s. 

I read something saying that he was very resistant to some changes the Marlins were trying to make in his mechanics.

North Side Contributor
Posted
Just now, squally1313 said:

The Marlins are far from some model organization, but there has to be some reason why he hasn't been called up all year. Their fifth starter is a 28 year old with a K/9 in the 5s. 

To be honest with you, I don't know why they haven't given him a look, either. The under the hood look at Triple-A isn't incredibly ugly. But I also wonder if they just...don't know what to do with him. 

Bendix is a former Rays guy and the Rays were always "velo-velo-velo" and Garrett is very much...not that. 

Posted
Just now, Jason Ross said:

To be honest with you, I don't know why they haven't given him a look, either. The under the hood look at Triple-A isn't incredibly ugly. But I also wonder if they just...don't know what to do with him. 

Bendix is a former Rays guy and the Rays were always "velo-velo-velo" and Garrett is very much...not that. 

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/08/marlins-trade-braxton-garrett-cubs.html

Quote

That said, Garrett has been hit hard in his past two starts, yielding a combined 13 runs in that time. Barry Jackson of the Miami Herald reported earlier in the day that part of the reason for Garrett’s extended Triple-A sojourn this season — despite several openings on the big league roster — was an aversion to some tweaks the team tried to get him to incorporate in spring training. Whether the Cubs want to see any changes before he gets a big league look remains unclear, but Garrett is a nice depth option for them all the same.

 

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

Yeah, I don't get them. At some point you have to push your chips in

Yeah, and this is the year for them to do it..

Posted

I'm content with what they got in the last 24 hours, I just wish the assets they used would have netted something better.

better than last year, at least

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Neuby said:

Ayers made Mo expendable . I don't really understand trading Rojas for Holmes but not Soriano?

Since the calendar flipped to May Soriano has a 4.6 ERA and 4.3 FIP. That first month is carrying so much water for him. 

  • Like 1
Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 minute ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Since the calendar flipped to May Soriano has a 4.6 ERA and 4.3 FIP. That first month is carrying so much water for him. 

True but upside , controllable and healthy ready to pitch now.

Posted
1 minute ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Since the calendar flipped to May Soriano has a 4.6 ERA and 4.3 FIP. That first month is carrying so much water for him. 

Those are fine numbers for a guy with multiple years of control. The fact that he can go nuclear hot is a not insignificant bonus 

Posted
1 minute ago, 17 Seconds said:

I'm content with what they got in the last 24 hours, I just wish the assets they used would have netted something better.

better than last year, at least

They got 2 guys as good or better than Boyd and a RP with upside as high or higher than anyone in their pen. I mean which starter, other than Skubal, was clearly better than either of Gausman/Holmes?

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...